IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v10y1999i6p617-637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological Modernisation in UK Science-Policy Communities: The Case of Acid Rain and Critical Loads

Author

Listed:
  • A.K. Tickle

    (School of Social and Natural Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London)

Abstract

This paper attempts to follow the political resolution of uncertainty within the acid rain debate in relation to science-policy processes in the UK from 1970 to the present day. It is suggested that the emergence of an epistemic community of scientists, policy-makers, and NGOs cohering around the key concept of critical loads, has been a necessary condition for the evolution of ecomodernist air pollution control policies. Finally it is suggested that although the epistemic community has been influential in diffusing critical loads-based approaches to air pollution control within the major supranational environmental regimes in Europe (the UN ECE and European Community), structural political and economic factors still remain the most important drivers of final policy.

Suggested Citation

  • A.K. Tickle, 1999. "Ecological Modernisation in UK Science-Policy Communities: The Case of Acid Rain and Critical Loads," Energy & Environment, , vol. 10(6), pages 617-637, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:10:y:1999:i:6:p:617-637
    DOI: 10.1260/0958305991499810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1260/0958305991499810
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1260/0958305991499810?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adler, Emanuel & Haas, Peter M., 1992. "Conclusion: epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(1), pages 367-390, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cynthia Couette, 2024. "Epistemic competition in global governance: The case of pharmaceutical patents," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(3), pages 516-527, June.
    2. Müller, Felix Claus & Ibert, Oliver, 2014. "(Re-)Sources of Innovation: Understanding and Comparing Innovation Dynamics through the Lens of Communities of Practice," IRS Working Papers 52, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    3. Luc Brès & Sébastien Mena & Marie‐Laure Salles‐Djelic, 2019. "Exploring the formal and informal roles of regulatory intermediaries in transnational multistakeholder regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 127-140, June.
    4. Erik Baekkeskov, 2016. "Explaining science-led policy-making: pandemic deaths, epistemic deliberation and ideational trajectories," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 49(4), pages 395-419, December.
    5. Jean Philippe Décieux, 2021. "The Dialectic of Transnational Integration and National Disintegration as Challenge for Multilevel Governance," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, July.
    6. Sedlačko Michal & Staroňová Katarína, 2015. "An Overview of Discourses on Knowledge in Policy: Thinking Knowledge, Policy and Conflict Together," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 10-31, December.
    7. Martha Isabel Gómez Lee, 2016. "Biodiversidad y políticas públicas: coaliciones de causa en las políticas de acceso a los recursos genéticos en Colombia," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionales, number 105, April.
    8. Tanja Börzel & Thomas Risse, 2000. "International Relations Theory and European Integration," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 56, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    9. Nina Boeger & Joseph Corkin, 2017. "Institutional Path-Dependencies in Europe's Networked Modes of Governance," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(5), pages 974-992, September.
    10. Kaidonis, Mary A., 2009. "Critical accounting as an epistemic community: Hegemony, resistance and identity," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 290-297.
    11. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:46:y:2008:i::p:195-218 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Creplet, F. & Dupouet, O. & Kern, F. & Mehmanpazir, B. & Munier, F., 2001. "Consultants and experts in management consulting firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1517-1535, December.
    13. Fikresus Amahazion, 2016. "Epistemic Communities, Human Rights, and the Global Diffusion of Legislation against the Organ Trade," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-31, October.
    14. Olmos Peñuela,Julia & Benneworth,Paul & Castro-Martínez,Elena, 2014. "Explaining researchersâ readiness to incorporate external stimuli in their research agendas," INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 201408, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV).
    15. repec:ilo:ilowps:389534 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Jesús Delgado-Baena & Juan de Dios García-Serrano & Laura Serrano & José Tomás Diestre Mejías, 2024. "Human Rights and Territories: Academic Perceptions of the 2030 Agenda," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-27, June.
    17. Theobald, Hildegard, 2001. "Professionalisierungspolitiken im Kontext von Internationalisierung und Feminisierung: Das Beispiel der Verbände in der Unternehmensberaterbranche," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Organization and Employment FS I 01-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    18. Elliott, Chris & Schlaepfer, Rodolphe, 2001. "Understanding forest certification using the Advocacy Coalition Framework," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(3-4), pages 257-266, July.
    19. Katharina Rietig, 2011. "The influence of academics as insidernongovernmental actors in the Post-Kyoto Protocol Climate Change Negotiations: a matter of timing, network and policyentrepreneurial capabilities," GRI Working Papers 58, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    20. Straßheim, Holger, 2001. "Der Ruf der Sirenen - Zur Dynamik politischen Benchmarkings: Eine Analyse anhand der US-Sozialreformen," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Regulation of Work FS II 01-201, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    21. Bernard Hoekman & Douglas Nelson, 2018. "21st Century Trade Agreements and the Owl of Minerva," RSCAS Working Papers 2018/04, European University Institute.
    22. Morgan Meyer & Susan Molyneux-Hodgson, 2010. "Introduction: The Dynamics of Epistemic Communities," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 15(2), pages 109-115, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:10:y:1999:i:6:p:617-637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.