IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/enejou/v45y2024i2p23-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Value Proved but Undeveloped Petroleum Reserves

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence M. Vielhaber

Abstract

Proved undeveloped reserves (PUDs) are typically assigned a value of zero when the cost to produce them is greater than the prevailing forward curve. The zero valuation occurs despite the option value contained in even the most expensive PUDs. While PUDs are worthless if spot and forward prices forever remain below the cost to produce them, they have positive value if either the spot price or a contracted futures price exceeds the cost at any time. Since the probability that future prices exceed cost is positive, PUDs have positive option value despite the industry practice. Zero valuation occurs primarily because financing is unavailable when hedging is contingent on uncertain future outcomes where probabilities cannot be modeled. The failure of models to recognize contingent hedging is a limitation that leads to chronically undervalued PUDs in marginal and sub-marginal price environments. The literature is silent on contingent hedging where financing is dependent on forward curves that will not exist until some future date. This paper introduces a model that addresses these limitations.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence M. Vielhaber, 2024. "How to Value Proved but Undeveloped Petroleum Reserves," The Energy Journal, , vol. 45(2), pages 23-47, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:45:y:2024:i:2:p:23-47
    DOI: 10.5547/01956574.45.2.lvie
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/01956574.45.2.lvie
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5547/01956574.45.2.lvie?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heath, David & Jarrow, Robert & Morton, Andrew, 1990. "Bond Pricing and the Term Structure of Interest Rates: A Discrete Time Approximation," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(4), pages 419-440, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chuang-Chang Chang & Ruey-Jenn Ho & Chengfew Lee, 2010. "Pricing credit card loans with default risks: a discrete-time approach," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 413-438, May.
    2. Rosa Ferrentino & Luca Vota, 2022. "A Mathematical Model for the Pricing of Derivative Financial Products: the Role of the Banking Supervision and of the Model Risk," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 1-2.
    3. Anja Richter & Josef Teichmann, 2014. "Discrete Time Term Structure Theory and Consistent Recalibration Models," Papers 1409.1830, arXiv.org.
    4. repec:uts:finphd:40 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Kim, Dong H. & Stock, Duane, 2014. "The effect of interest rate volatility and equity volatility on corporate bond yield spreads: A comparison of noncallables and callables," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 20-35.
    6. Oldrich Alfons Vasicek & Francisco Venegas-Martínez, 2021. "Models of the Term Structure of Interest Rates: Review, Trends, and Perspectives," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 16(2), pages 1-28, Abril - J.
    7. Isaiah Hull & Or Sattath & Eleni Diamanti & Göran Wendin, 2024. "Quantum Technology for Economists," Contributions to Economics, Springer, number 978-3-031-50780-9, December.
    8. Dwight Grant & Gautam Vora, 2006. "Extending the universality of the Heath–Jarrow–Morton model," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 129-157.
    9. Klaassen, Pieter, 1997. "Discretized reality and spurious profits in stochastic programming models for asset/liability management," Serie Research Memoranda 0011, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    10. David Bolder, 2001. "Affine Term-Structure Models: Theory and Implementation," Staff Working Papers 01-15, Bank of Canada.
    11. Byers, Joe Wayne, 2006. "Commodity storage valuation: A linear optimization based on traded instruments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 275-287, May.
    12. Wilhelm, Jochen, 2000. "Das Gaußsche Zinsstrukturmodell: Eine Analyse auf der Basis von Wahrscheinlichkeitsverteilungen," Passauer Diskussionspapiere, Betriebswirtschaftliche Reihe 6, University of Passau, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    13. Mahendra Raj, 1994. "Pricing options on short-term interest rates using discrete arbitrage-free models," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 1-3.
    14. V. M. Belyaev, 2016. "Swaption Prices in HJM model. Nonparametric fit," Papers 1607.01619, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2017.
    15. Gupta, Anurag & Subrahmanyam, Marti G., 2000. "An empirical examination of the convexity bias in the pricing of interest rate swaps," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 239-279, February.
    16. San-Lin Chung & Hsiao-Fen Yang, 2005. "Pricing Quanto Equity Swaps in a Stochastic Interest Rate Economy," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 121-146.
    17. Giacometti, Rosella & Teocchi, Mariangela, 2005. "On pricing of credit spread options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(1), pages 52-64, May.
    18. L. L. Ghezzi, 1997. "Immunization and Max–Min Optimal Control," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 701-711, December.
    19. Ladokhin, Sergiy & Borovkova, Svetlana, 2021. "Three-factor commodity forward curve model and its joint P and Q dynamics," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    20. Michael J. Tomas & Jun Yu, 2021. "An Asymptotic Solution for Call Options on Zero-Coupon Bonds," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-23, August.
    21. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5374 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Farshid Jamshidian, 1997. "LIBOR and swap market models and measures (*)," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 293-330.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:45:y:2024:i:2:p:23-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.