IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsr/supplm/v65y2017i9p83-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

GIS mathematic model analyzing the attractiveness of the Romanian settlements network, assessing the competitiveness factors at national level

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio TACHE

    (”URBAN-INCERC” National Institute for Research and Development in Constructions, Town Planning and Sustainable Territorial Development)

  • Oana-Catalina Popescu

    (”URBAN-INCERC” National Institute for Research and Development in Constructions, Town Planning and Sustainable Territorial Development)

  • Monica Tache

    (”URBAN-INCERC” National Institute for Research and Development in Constructions, Town Planning and Sustainable Territorial Development)

Abstract

The planning activity is essential for territorial development. Cities have a catalytic effect on economic development and on the establishment of functional local networks. The article aims to present the assessment of the economic potential of Romanian localities – for development, stability or decline – by identifying the factors causing such trends. The method used is an innovative one. Thus, for each analysed indicator at locality level, a grouping of values was achieved on 10 intervals, in accordance with the standard scheme for classification on natural breaks (Jencks), obtaining thus 10 groups and for which scores from 1 to 10 have been assessed, in ascending order of values. For each studied domain and each locality, an index was calculated as the average of all scores, weighted by importance coefficients. Similarly, a final attractiveness index at locality level was obtained, as an average of corresponding indexes for all studied domains weighted by their coefficients of importance. Specific indexes calculated for each domain and the final attractiveness index for all localities were translated into thematic GIS maps, by using ARCGIS 10.2.2. and its statistical support. The article was developed based on studies of the project PN 16.10.07.01 – Phase-III: “Analysing the attractiveness of urban and rural localities network as competitive, dynamic and innovative entities, in order to connect to the European network of development poles and corridors” and project 63PED / 2017 – “Innovative model for the territorial planning of a polycentric and balanced settlements network in the context of smart specialization of Romania’s cities.”

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio TACHE & Oana-Catalina Popescu & Monica Tache, 2017. "GIS mathematic model analyzing the attractiveness of the Romanian settlements network, assessing the competitiveness factors at national level," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(9), pages 83-102, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsr:supplm:v:65:y:2017:i:9:p:83-102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revistadestatistica.ro/supliment/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/A4en_rrss_09_20171.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bo Vesterdorf, 2010. "Due Process Before the Commission of the European Union? Some Reflections Upon Reading the Commission Draft Paper on Best Practices in Antitrust Proceedings," Antitrust Chronicle, Competition Policy International, vol. 4.
    2. Simin Davoudi, 2003. "EUROPEAN BRIEFING: Polycentricity in European spatial planning: from an analytical tool to a normative agenda," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(8), pages 979-999, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivan Muñiz & Anna Galindo & Miguel Angel García, 2005. "Descentralisation, Integration and polycentrism in Barcelona," Working Papers wpdea0512, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    2. Ahlfeldt, Gabriel M. & Wendlan, Nicolai, 2008. "Spatial Determinants of CBD Emergence: A Micro-level Case Study on Berlin∗," MPRA Paper 11572, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Daniela Smiraglia & Luca Salvati & Gianluca Egidi & Rosanna Salvia & Antonio Giménez-Morera & Rares Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir, 2021. "Toward a New Urban Cycle? A Closer Look to Sprawl, Demographic Transitions and the Environment in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, January.
    4. John Parr, 2015. "The city and the region as contrasts in spatial organization," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 797-817, May.
    5. Loris Servillo & Rob Atkinson & Abdelillah Hamdouch & Loris Servillo & Antonio Paolo Russo, 2017. "Spatial Trends of Towns in Europe: The Performance of Regions with Low Degree of Urbanisation," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(4), pages 403-423, September.
    6. lain Deas & Alex Lord, 2006. "From a New Regionalism to an Unusual Regionalism? The Emergence of Non-standard Regional Spaces and Lessons for the Territorial Reorganisation of the State," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1847-1877, September.
    7. Gordon Dabinett, 2010. "Spatial Justice and the Translation of European Strategic Planning Ideas in the Urban Sub-region of South Yorkshire," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(11), pages 2389-2408, October.
    8. Colin Jones, 2017. "Spatial economy and the geography of functional economic areas," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 44(3), pages 486-503, May.
    9. Andrzej H. Jasiński, 2021. "Czy mamy stagnację innowacji w polskim przemyśle?," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1, pages 111-134.
    10. Robbert Zandvliet & Martin Dijst, 2006. "Short-term Dynamics in the Use of Places: A Space-Time Typology of Visitor Populations in the Netherlands," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(7), pages 1159-1176, June.
    11. H. P. U. Fonseka & H. M. R. Premasiri & S. P. Chaminda & Hongsheng Zhang, 2024. "Morphological and Functional Polycentric Urbanization in Colombo Metropolitan of Sri Lanka Using Time-Series Satellite Images from 1988–2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Jiří Malý & Marek Lichter & Tomáš Krejčí, 2024. "The elusive role of urban form, centrality and scale in the absence of a metropolitan planning agenda: Central European perspective," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), March.
    13. Paola Bertolini & Enrico Giovannetti & Francesco Pagliacci, 2011. "Regional patterns in the achievement of the Lisbon Strategy: a comparison between polycentric regions and monocentric ones," Center for the Analysis of Public Policies (CAPP) 0097, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    14. Tianren Yang & Ying Jin & Longxu Yan & Pei Pei, 2019. "Aspirations and realities of polycentric development: Insights from multi-source data into the emerging urban form of Shanghai," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(7), pages 1264-1280, September.
    15. Jouni Häkli & Kirsi Pauliina Kallio & Olli Ruokolainen, 2020. "A Missing Citizen? Issue Based Citizenship in City‐Regional Planning," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 876-893, September.
    16. Paolo Veneri, 2010. "Urban Polycentricity and the Costs of Commuting: Evidence from Italian Metropolitan Areas," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 403-429, September.
    17. Dogaru, Teodora & Burger, Martijn & van Oort, Frank & Karreman, Bas, 2014. "The Geography of Multinational Corporations in CEE Countries: Perspectives for Second-Tier City Regions and European Cohesion Policy," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 29, pages 193-214.
    18. Robbert Zandvliet & Martin Dijst, 2005. "Breaking Down the Daily Use of Places - A Space-Time Typology of Temporary Populations in the Netherlands," ERSA conference papers ersa05p203, European Regional Science Association.
    19. María D. De-Juan-Vigaray & Ana I. Espinosa Seguí, 2019. "Retailing, Consumers, and Territory: Trends of an Incipient Circular Model," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Laura Varela-Candamio & Fernando Rubiera Morollón & Gohar Sedrakyan, 2019. "Urban sprawl and local fiscal burden: analysing the Spanish case," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 46(1), pages 177-203, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    attractiveness; index; mathematical model; domain; maps; LAU2;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • R12 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; Interregional Trade (economic geography)
    • R23 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population
    • R42 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government and Private Investment Analysis; Road Maintenance; Transportation Planning
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsr:supplm:v:65:y:2017:i:9:p:83-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adrian Visoiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stagvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.