IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/rmcimn/v22y2021i3p376-388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Path from Digitization to Digital Transformation: The Case of Two Traditional Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Ioana BORCAN

    (University of Craiova)

Abstract

Digital Transformation poses considerable challenges for organizations, especially for the ones whose origins go back to a pre-digital era. A misunderstanding of key concepts, capabilities involved in the process or expected outcomes can lead to confusion and costly mistakes. The objectives of the article are threefold: clarify the theoretical concept of digital transformation, understand its content and map the tactical approach for its execution. The paper’s background is set on a theoretical approach, allowing an understanding of the key terms. The case study allows the understanding of this complex phenomenon within its context. The researches expected results are the identification of the key elements contributing to the success or failure of the transformation and the proposal of a framework useful for the evaluation of a company’s digital maturity.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioana BORCAN, 2021. "The Path from Digitization to Digital Transformation: The Case of Two Traditional Organizations," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(3), pages 376-388, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:rmcimn:v:22:y:2021:i:3:p:376-388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rmci.ase.ro/no22vol3/07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adriana Schiopoiu Burlea, 2019. "The Impact of Triple Bottom Dispersal of Actions on Integrated Reporting: A Critical Perspective," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Samuel O. Idowu & Mara Del Baldo (ed.), Integrated Reporting, chapter 0, pages 141-152, Springer.
    2. Christian Arnold & Daniel Kiel & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2016. "How The Industrial Internet Of Things Changes Business Models In Different Manufacturing Industries," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(08), pages 1-25, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Firican Diana Andreea, 2024. "Creating a Digital Culture for Digital Transformation: A Literature Review of Practical Steps," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 1018-1028.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Arnold & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2019. "Determinants of Industrial Internet of Things Adoption in German Manufacturing Companies," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Leonid Mylnikov & Martin Kuetz, 2017. "Electric Power Supply Subsystem and its Role in Solving Production System Management and Planning Issues," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(5), pages 191-200.
    3. Paul Schneider, 2018. "Managerial challenges of Industry 4.0: an empirically backed research agenda for a nascent field," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 803-848, July.
    4. Ioana BORCAN, 2021. "The Role Of Dynamic Capabilities, Business Model And Organizational Culture In The Digital Transformation Of A Traditional Organization," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 108-124, May.
    5. Snigdha Malhotra & Vernika Agarwal & P. K. Kapur, 2022. "Hierarchical framework for analysing the challenges of implementing industrial Internet of Things in manufacturing industries using ISM approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(5), pages 2356-2370, October.
    6. Ancillai, Chiara & Sabatini, Andrea & Gatti, Marco & Perna, Andrea, 2023. "Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Justyna Zabawa & Cyprian Kozyra, 2020. "Eco-Banking in Relation to Financial Performance of the Sector—The Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, March.
    8. Christoph Stoiber & Stefan Schönig, 2024. "Leveraging the industrial internet of things for business process improvement: a metamodel and patterns," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 285-313, June.
    9. Daniel Kiel & Julian M. Müller & Christian Arnold & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2017. "Sustainable Industrial Value Creation: Benefits And Challenges Of Industry 4.0," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(08), pages 1-34, December.
    10. Lerch, Christian M. & Horvat, Djerdj & Jasny, Johannes, 2024. "When manufacturers turn into digital platform providers: A transformation model to understand the platformization pathway," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    11. Li Da Xu, 2020. "The contribution of systems science to Industry 4.0," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 618-631, July.
    12. Sebastian Saniuk & Sandra Grabowska & Bożena Gajdzik, 2020. "Social Expectations and Market Changes in the Context of Developing the Industry 4.0 Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    13. Piotr Zientara & Paulina Bohdanowicz-Godfrey & Claire Whitely & Grzegorz Maciejewski, 2020. "A Case Study of LightStay (2010–2017)—Hilton’s Corporate Responsibility Management System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco & Tarba, Shlomo, 2022. "Exploring the interplay between Smart Manufacturing and KIBS firms in configuring product-service innovation performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    15. Mosch, Philipp & Schweikl, Stefan & Obermaier, Robert, 2021. "Trapped in the supply chain? Digital servitization strategies and power relations in the case of an industrial technology supplier," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    16. Zhengxin Wang & Minghuan Shou & Shuai Wang & Ruinan Dai & Keqian Wang, 2019. "An Empirical Study on the Key Factors of Intelligent Upgrade of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, January.
    17. Atik Kulakli & Cenk Lacin Arikan, 2023. "Research Trends of the Internet of Things in Relation to Business Model Innovation: Results from Co-Word and Content Analyses," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Wojciech Lewicki & Wojciech Drozdz, 2021. "Electromobility and its Development Prospects in the Context of Industry 4.0: A Comparative Study of Poland and the European Union," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 135-144.
    19. Mina Nasiri & Minna Saunila & Juhani Ukko & Tero Rantala & Hannu Rantanen, 2023. "Shaping Digital Innovation Via Digital-related Capabilities," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1063-1080, June.
    20. Sebastian Brenk & Dirk Lüttgens & Kathleen Diener & Frank Piller, 2019. "Learning from failures in business model innovation: solving decision-making logic conflicts through intrapreneurial effectuation," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(8), pages 1097-1147, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    digitalization; digital transformation; digitization; business model innovation; digital maturity.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L2 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior
    • L6 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing
    • L15 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Information and Product Quality
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:rmcimn:v:22:y:2021:i:3:p:376-388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marian Nastase (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.