IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mrpase/v4y2012i2p20-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study Regarding The Implementation Of Corporate Governance Principles In The Public Enterprises In Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Minodora URSACESCU

    (Academy of Economic Studies, Piata Romana, 6, Bucharest)

  • Mihai CIOC

    (Academy of Economic Studies, Piata Romana, 6, Bucharest)

Abstract

The actual economic stage in Romania imposed the adopting of some quick measures in the direction of creating the regulatory framework that should encourage the increasing of public enterprises’ performances. In this context, GEO (Government emergency Ordinance) nr 109/30.11.2011 states a set of legislative and best practices standards regarding the application of corporate governance principles in the public enterprises, as a consequence of the obligations assumed by the Romanian Government through the Cover Letter to I.M.F. dated 07.06.2011. The paper intends to highlight a series of practical aspects linked to the effect of applying the above mentioned ordinance in the managerial and administrative practices in the Romanian public enterprises, simultaneously with proposing a rating system of the corporate governance applicable in these enterprises based on using the Key Performance Indicators. This research aims to provide an innovative evaluation system of the public enterprises’ corporate governance rating, with practical utility both for the public authority and for the management organisms of the aimed enterprises. Starting from this, the findings of the study lead towards the rating system’s elaboration of the corporate governance in the public enterprises, based on benchmarks constituted in the form of Key Performance Indicators. The research reflects a series of practical aspects, in managerial plan, regarding the assimilation of the corporate governance principles in the public enterprises, also offering in the same time the methodology’s bases for assessing the degree in which the assimilation of these principles has been realized at organizational level.

Suggested Citation

  • Minodora URSACESCU & Mihai CIOC, 2012. "A Study Regarding The Implementation Of Corporate Governance Principles In The Public Enterprises In Romania," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 4(2), pages 20-32, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mrpase:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:20-32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mrp.ase.ro/no42/f2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steve Letza & Xiuping Sun & James Kirkbride, 2004. "Shareholding Versus Stakeholding: a critical review of corporate governance," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 242-262, July.
    2. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1997. "A Survey of Corporate Governance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 737-783, June.
    3. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    4. Gérard Charreaux & Philippe Desbrières, 1998. "Gouvernance des entreprises:valeur partenariale contre valeur actionnariale," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 1(2), pages 57-88, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gérard Charreaux, 2002. "Variation sur le thème:"À la recherche de nouvelles fondations pour la finance et la gouvernance d'entreprise"," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 5(3), pages 5-68, September.
    2. Céline Chatelin & Stéphane Trebucq, 2002. "Du processus d'élaboration du cadre conceptuel en gouvernance d'entreprise A development process Of a conceptual framework of corporate governance," Working Papers CREGO 1021201, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
    3. Thierry Poulain-Rehm & Xavier Lepers, 2013. "Does Employee Ownership Benefit Value Creation? The Case of France (2001–2005)," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 325-340, January.
    4. Mohamed Ech-Chebany & Anas Hattabou & Adil Ouatat, 2022. "Private governance and public governance: An attempt at theoretical and interdisciplinary rapprochement [La gouvernance privée et la gouvernance publique : Un essai de rapprochement théorique et in," Post-Print hal-03749792, HAL.
    5. ATM Adnan & Nisar Ahmed, 2019. "The Transformation Of The Corporate Governance Model: A Literature Review," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 8(3), pages 7-47.
    6. Lepage, Fanny & Couderc, Jean-Pierre & Perrier, Jean-Philippe, 2014. "Déterminants des décisions d’investissement dans les exploitations laitières. Une approche par la théorie de la gouvernance élargie," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 341(May-June).
    7. Céline Chatelin & Nathalie Dubost, 2012. "Role of Identity as a Key Factor in Understanding Corporate Governance Conflicts [L'identité de rôle comme source de compréhension des conflits en gouvernance]," Post-Print halshs-01763614, HAL.
    8. Muzhar Javed & Muhammad Waheed Akhtar & Mudassir Husnain & Rabnawaz Lodhi & Sonia Emaan, 2020. "A stakeholder‐centric paradigm bids well for the “business case” ‐ An investigation through moderated‐mediation model," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2563-2577, November.
    9. Gérard Charreaux, 2011. "Quelle théorie pour la gouvernance?De la gouvernance actionnariale à la gouvernance cognitive et comportementale," Working Papers CREGO 1110402, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
    10. El Bouhadi, Abdelhamid & Dasser, Salma & Lahlou, Amale & Elkhider, Abdelkader, 2009. "Contrôle et régulation du marché boursier : un problème de risque moral [THE Stock Market Control and Regulation: A Moral Hazard Problem]," MPRA Paper 19819, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Pierre-Yves Gomez, 2003. "Jalons pour une histoire des théories du gouvernement des entreprises," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 6(4), pages 183-208, December.
    12. Riaz, Zahid & Ray, Pradeep & Ray, Sangeeta, 2022. "The impact of digitalisation on corporate governance in Australia," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 410-424.
    13. ATM Adnan & Hilda Tandigalla, 2017. "The Dramatic Shift In Emphasis From A Shareholder-Dominated Approach To A Stakeholder-Oriented Corporate Governance Model," European Journal of Business and Economics, Central Bohemia University, vol. 12(2), pages 11151:12-11, January.
    14. Marc-Hubert Depret & Abdelillah Hamdouch, 2004. "La gouvernance des jeunes entreprises innovantes:un éclairage analytique à partir du cas des sociétés de biotechnologies," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 7(2), pages 67-94, June.
    15. Elena Merino & Montserrat Manzaneque & Yolanda Ramírez, 2019. "Value-added distribution to stakeholder of Spanish listed companies: a corporate governance perspective," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(3), pages 577-604, September.
    16. Saïsset, L.A. & Couderc, J.P., 2013. "Les trois dimensions de la gouvernance coopérative : à la recherche d'un équilibre instable. Le cas des caves coopératives en Languedoc-Roussillon [France]," Working Papers MoISA 201302, UMR MoISA : Montpellier Interdisciplinary center on Sustainable Agri-food systems (social and nutritional sciences): CIHEAM-IAMM, CIRAD, INRAE, L'Institut Agro, Montpellier SupAgro, IRD - Montpellier, France.
    17. Michael Carney & Eric Gedajlovic & Sujit Sur, 2011. "Corporate governance and stakeholder conflict," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 15(3), pages 483-507, August.
    18. Peter Wirtz, 2002. "Opportunism, Stewardship, and the Dynamics of Conflict in a Theory of Corporate Governance," Working Papers CREGO 1020101, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
    19. Gérard Charreaux, 2001. "Quelle théorie pour la gouvernance?De la gouvernance actionnariale à la gouvernance cognitive..," Working Papers CREGO 010401, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations, revised Feb 2002.
    20. Sylvain Marsat & Yves Mard & Fabien Roux, 2014. "Ownership structure and corporate financial performance: evidence from France [Structure de l’actionnariat et performance financière de l’entreprise : le cas français]," Post-Print hal-02156607, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mrpase:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:20-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.