IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v14y2020i1p368-377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management And Innovation In Entrepreneurial Universities From The Cultural Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Oana BALAN-BUDOIU
  • Liviu ILIES

Abstract

In very many areas, the global cultural sector is currently experiencing a major economic crisis, caused mainly by the technology lag that has steadily increased in the past years. The possible elimination of certain art fields which cannot keep up with the dynamics of consumption markets will induce a series of adverse effects most acutely perceivable on the socio-educational level. This study defines the model of the executive innovation in functional and conceptual terms, being applicable in the sphere of art universities. We shall configure a series of entrepreneurial prototypes specific to higher education institutions meant to formulate an adequate position in relationship to the tendencies of the future. We believe that, in order to innovate the top-level management in culture, we must identify and implement good managerial practices, based on the expertise of researchers with a high academic level, provide scientific arguments, achieve a realistic strategic plan that can produce a viable transformation leading towards an open, interactive system based on innovation and adapted to the times we live in.

Suggested Citation

  • Oana BALAN-BUDOIU & Liviu ILIES, 2020. "Management And Innovation In Entrepreneurial Universities From The Cultural Sector," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 368-377, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:368-377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://conferinta.management.ase.ro/archives/2020/PDF/2_12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus C. Becker & Thorbjørn Knudsen, 2002. "Schumpeter 1911: Farsighted Visions on Economic Development," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 387-403, April.
    2. F. H. Knight, 1921. "Cost of Production and Price over Long and Short Periods," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(4), pages 304-304.
    3. Holger Patzelt & Dean A. Shepherd, 2011. "Recognizing Opportunities for Sustainable Development," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(4), pages 631-652, July.
    4. Saras D. Sarasvathy & Sankaran Venkataraman, 2011. "Entrepreneurship as Method: Open Questions for an Entrepreneurial Future," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 113-135, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wentao Gu & Hairui Pan & Zimin Hu & Zhongdi Liu, 2022. "The Triple Bottom Line of Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Economic Policy Uncertainty: An Empirical Evidence from 22 Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Olawale Fatoki, 2019. "Sustainability orientation and sustainable entrepreneurial intentions of university students in South Africa," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 990-999, December.
    3. Johan Graafland, 2020. "Competition in technology and innovation, motivation crowding, and environmental policy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 137-145, January.
    4. Pedi Revecca & Sarri Katerina, 2019. "From the ‘Small but Smart State’ to the ‘Small and Entrepreneurial State’: Introducing a Framework for Effective Small State Strategies within the EU and Beyond," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 3-19, June.
    5. Jones, Raymond J. & Barnir, Anat, 2019. "Properties of opportunity creation and discovery: Comparing variation in contexts of innovativeness," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-10.
    6. Karin Andrea Wigger & Dean A. Shepherd, 2020. "We’re All in the Same Boat: A Collective Model of Preserving and Accessing Nature-Based Opportunities," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(3), pages 587-617, May.
    7. Sabrina Artinger & Nir Vulkan & Yotam Shem-Tov, 2015. "Entrepreneurs’ negotiation behavior," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 737-757, April.
    8. Alain Fayolle, 2021. "Towards an emancipatory entrepreneurship pedagogy : From critical constructivism key ideas to Paulo Freire’s educational model [Promouvoir une pédagogie émancipatrice de l’entrepreneuriat : Des idé," Post-Print hal-03633777, HAL.
    9. Selomie Daniel & Elmar Steurer & Bernard Wagemann, 2017. "Productive use of renewable energy supporting applied entrepreneurship – Lessons learned from a development project in rural Ethiopia," Proceedings Paper, in: Bode, Jürgen & Freitag, Christine (ed.), Universities, Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Development in Africa - Conference Proceedings 2016, volume 5, pages 7-24, Universities Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Development in Africa International Conference.
    10. Antoni Olive-Tomas & Susan S. Harmeling, 2020. "The rise of art movements: an effectual process model of Picasso’s and Braque’s give-and-take during the creation of Cubism (1908–1914)," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 819-842, March.
    11. Ursula Småland Goth & Eldbjørg Marie Schön, 2015. "Teaching Entrepreneurship by Using the “Student Enterprise Model†to Future Vocational Teachers," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 6(1), pages 68-78.
    12. Rietveld, C.A. & van Burg, E., 2013. "Religious beliefs and entrepreneurship among Dutch protestants," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2013-015-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    13. Ana Dias Daniel & Shahzada Adeel & Anabela Botelho, 2021. "Entrepreneurial Alertness Research: Past and Future," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    14. Erik Lundmark & Alf Westelius, 2014. "Entrepreneurship as Elixir and Mutagen," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 38(3), pages 575-600, May.
    15. Antonio Rafael Ramos-Rodriguez & Salustiano Martinez-Fierro & Jose Aurelio Medina-Garrido & Jose Ruiz-Navarro, 2023. "Global Entrepreneurship Monitor versus Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics: comparing their intellectual structures," Papers 2401.13684, arXiv.org.
    16. Brandon H. Lee & Panayiotis Panikos Georgallis & Jeroen Struben, 2022. "Sustainable entrepreneurship under market uncertainty," Post-Print hal-04325583, HAL.
    17. Mª Del Mar Ramos-González & Mercedes Rubio-Andrés & Miguel Ángel Sastre-Castillo, 2017. "Building Corporate Reputation through Sustainable Entrepreneurship: The Mediating Effect of Ethical Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, September.
    18. Forsström-Tuominen, Heidi & Jussila, Iiro & Kolhinen, Johanna, 2015. "Business school students’ social construction of entrepreneurship: Claiming space for collective entrepreneurship discourses," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 102-120.
    19. Margo P. M. Enthoven & Aleid E. Brouwer, 2020. "Investigating spatial concentration of sustainable restaurants: It is all about good food!," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 64(3), pages 575-594, June.
    20. Sara Proença & Elias Soukiazis, 2023. "The process of sustainable entrepreneurship: a multi-country analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 10995-11010, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:368-377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.