IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v11y2017i1p999-1004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges Of The Intellectual Capital From A Management Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Paula FRUSINOIU
  • Cristina DIMA
  • Mihai CONSTANTINESCU

Abstract

The extensive framework which shows connections between intellectual capital and other concepts such as management of human resources, knowledge management, learning organizations, strategic management, places intellectual capital at the heart of the new management thinking that reflects on how organisational problems are foreseen and solved at present. In this new approach, the management of an organisation is no longer about managing the return from capital, but it is about recognising and making use of the organisational, structural resources and the knowledge of the staff. While IC marked the transition from the traditional approach in which financial capital was key to gaining wealth to an approach in which knowledge stood out as the main resource of an organisation, be it public, private or education-oriented, the interest in identification and reporting of IC has grown as several models were developed to help orient management decisions. Building on the early work of several scholars (Hermanson, 1964, Hekimian and Jones, 1967) who first tried to account for the worth of employees, several models have been proposed in time (Sveiby, 1997, Mouritsen 1998, Meer-Kooistra and Zijlstra, 2001), in the attempt to report on IC resources and turn IC management into a pillar of strategic management. As IC has become one of the concepts embraced even by higher education institutions from business along with strategic planning or total quality management (Leitner et al., 2016), the transfer of IC models to public institutions has posed several challenges in terms of performance, bureaucracy and the role of the public servant (Sousa et al., 2016). Against the multitude of IC reporting models, scholars agree that, for an institution that wishes to be connected to the demands of the society, IC management and IC reporting is a way to make a the activity of an organisation more transparent, visible and more efficient. The purpose of this article is to generalize the concept of intellectual capital and its role in the development of an organisation, private and public. The methods applied are the synthesis and analysis of academic research and publications.

Suggested Citation

  • Paula FRUSINOIU & Cristina DIMA & Mihai CONSTANTINESCU, 2017. "Challenges Of The Intellectual Capital From A Management Perspective," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 999-1004, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:999-1004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://conference.management.ase.ro/archives/2017/pdf/5_13.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sydler, Renato & Haefliger, Stefan & Pruksa, Robert, 2014. "Measuring intellectual capital with financial figures: Can we predict firm profitability?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 244-259.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Maria Biscotti & Eugenio D’Amico, 2019. "Does Equity Market Differently Perceive IC Management and Disclosure Behaviours?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(2), pages 756-775, June.
    2. Sakinah Mat Zin & Ahmad Azrin Adnan & Iskandar Hasan Abdullah, 2017. "How Can Ibn Khaldun’s Economic Philosophy Revive the Intellectual Capital of Entrepreneurs," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(6), pages 164-164, June.
    3. Tatiana Andreeva & Tatiana Garanina, 2017. "Intellectual Capital and Its Impact on the Financial Performance of Russian Manufacturing Companies," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 11(1 (eng)), pages 31-40.
    4. Samul Joanna & Skapska Elzbieta & Pankov Dmitrij, 2019. "Employees’ Competences in Knowledge-Intensive Business Sector – Comparative Analysis in Two Cee Countries," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 64(1), pages 3-15, April.
    5. M. Carolina Martins Rodrigues & Raul Pommer Barbosa & Luciana Aparecida Barbieri da Rosa & Maria José Sousa & Waleska Yone Yamakawa Zavatti Campos, 2022. "Intellectual Capital of Technology-Based Incubators," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Andreeva, T. & Garanina, T., 2015. "Intellectual capital elements and organizational performance of Russian manufacturing companies," Working Papers 6413, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    7. Gianluca Ginesti & Mario Ossorio, 2021. "The influence of family-related factors on intellectual capital performance in family businesses," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(2), pages 535-560, June.
    8. Raquel Ortega-Lapiedra & Miguel Marco-Fondevila & Sabina Scarpellini & Fernando Llena-Macarulla, 2019. "Measurement of the Human Capital Applied to the Business Eco-Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Martina Musteen & Mujtaba Ahsan & Taekyung Park, 2017. "SMEs, Intellectual Capital, and Offshoring of Service Activities: An Empirical Investigation," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 603-630, August.
    10. Keonhyeong Lee & Liyuan Wang, 2023. "Chinese High-Tech Export Performance: Effects of Intellectual Capital Mediated by Dynamic and Risk Management Capabilities," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, February.
    11. Camelia Oprean-Stan & Sebastian Stan & Vasile Brătian, 2020. "Corporate Sustainability and Intangible Resources Binomial: New Proposal on Intangible Resources Recognition and Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Didik Susilo & Sugeng Wahyudi & Irene Rini Demi Pangestuti, 2020. "Profitability Determinants of Manufacturing Firms in Indonesia," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 53-64.
    13. Guangchun Jin & Jian Xu, 2022. "Does Intellectual Capital Affect Financial Leverage of Chinese Agricultural Companies? Exploring the Role of Firm Profitability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, February.
    14. Mohammad Nourani & VGR Chandran & Qian Long Kweh & Wen-Min Lu, 2018. "Measuring Human, Physical and Structural Capital Efficiency Performance of Insurance Companies," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 281-315, May.
    15. Yongfu Li & Yu Song & Jinxin Wang & Chengwei Li, 2019. "Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation Performance: Evidence from the Chinese Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Bernadette Power & Gavin C Reid, 2021. "The Impact of Intellectual Property Types on the Performance of Business Start-ups in the USA," Working Papers wp523, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    17. Gareeva Yuliya & Dranev Yury & Kucherov Alexander, 2018. "The Impact of Innovation Capital on Firm Values," HSE Working papers WP BRP 79/STI/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    18. Bernini, Cristina & Galli, Federica, 2023. "Innovation, productivity and spillover effects in the Italian accommodation industry," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    19. Mariia A. Molodchik & Carlos Jardon & Angel Barajas, 2015. "The Firm Size Effect On Performance Due To Intangible Resources," HSE Working papers WP BRP 35/MAN/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    20. Jian Xu & Binghan Wang, 2018. "Intellectual Capital, Financial Performance and Companies’ Sustainable Growth: Evidence from the Korean Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:999-1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.