IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/ep1843.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Configuration Approach to Researching Regional Entrepreneurial Ecosystems
[Конфигурационный Подход К Исследованию Региональной Экосистемы Предпринимательства]

Author

Listed:
  • Solodilova, Natalia Z. (Солодилова, Наталья)

    (Ufa State Petroleum Technological University)

  • Malikov, Rustam I. (Маликов, Рустам И.)

    (Ufa State Petroleum Technological University)

  • Grishin, Constantin E. (Гришин, Константин Е.)

    (Bashkir State University)

Abstract

The article deals with the development of entrepreneurship at the regional level. The necessity of taking into account the context and its impact on the practice of managing the development of entrepreneurship in the region is justified. For the study of entrepreneurship with the influence of the regional context considered, it is proposed to use the ecosystem approach, which allows focusing on the specific context of business development. Based on the analysis of foreign and domestic sources, the author’s definition of the concept of “regional entrepreneurial ecosystem” is given. It is proved that, due to the uniqueness of each regional entrepreneurial ecosystem, it is advisable to use the configuration approach, which ensures that the diversity and variability of the regional context are taken into account. It is proposed to consider each regional entrepreneurial ecosystem as a set of nine configuration subsystems. The estimation of the configuration profiles implies using area or volume values, formed, in aggregate, by the parameters characterizing the configuration. A methodology for identifying the configuration profile of a given subsystem in a regional entrepreneurial ecosystem is developed. Based on the methodology in question, the efficiency of the configuration profiles of state institutions regulating entrepreneurship in the 85 subjects of the Russian Federation is identified. The approach substantiated in the article makes it possible to develop practical mechanisms for effective management of regional entrepreneurial ecosystem configurations, which, in turn, would contribute to more dynamic and predictable growth of business and investment activities in Russian regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Solodilova, Natalia Z. (Солодилова, Наталья) & Malikov, Rustam I. (Маликов, Рустам И.) & Grishin, Constantin E. (Гришин, Константин Е.), 2018. "Configuration Approach to Researching Regional Entrepreneurial Ecosystems [Конфигурационный Подход К Исследованию Региональной Экосистемы Предпринимательства]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 5, pages 134-155, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/ep1843.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zoltán J. Acs & David B. Audretsch & Erik E. Lehmann & Georg Licht, 2016. "National systems of entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 527-535, April.
    2. Gregory G. Dess & G. T. Lumpkin & J. G. Covin, 1997. "Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: tests of contingency and configurational models," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(9), pages 677-695, October.
    3. Malikov, Rustam (Маликов, Рустам) & Grishin, Konstantin (Гришин, Константин), 2014. "Simulation parameters of the institutional configuration of the regional business environment [Моделирование Параметров Развития Институциональной Конфигурации Региональной Деловой Среды]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 171-185, December.
    4. A. Degtyarev & R. Malikov & K. Grishin., 2014. "Institutional Configurations of Regional Business Environment: Projection Parameters," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 11.
    5. Wiklund, Johan & Shepherd, Dean, 2005. "Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 71-91, January.
    6. Karina Bogatyreva & Galina Shirokova, 2017. "From Entrepreneurial Aspirations to Founding a Business: The Case of Russian Students," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(3), pages 25-36.
    7. Alexander Chepurenko, 2017. "Entrepreneurial Activity in Post-Socialist Countries: Methodology and Research Limitations," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(3), pages 11-24.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Avlonitis, George J. & Salavou, Helen E., 2007. "Entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs, product innovativeness, and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(5), pages 566-575, May.
    2. Danny Miller & Isabelle Le Breton–Miller, 2011. "Governance, Social Identity, and Entrepreneurial Orientation in Closely Held Public Companies," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(5), pages 1051-1076, September.
    3. Knight, Gary & Moen, Øystein & Madsen, Tage Koed, 2020. "Antecedents to differentiation strategy in the exporting SME," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(6).
    4. John A. Pearce II & David A. Fritz & Peter S. Davis, 2010. "Entrepreneurial Orientation and the Performance of Religious Congregations as Predicted by Rational Choice Theory," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(1), pages 219-248, January.
    5. Samwel Otieno & Prof. Henry M. Bwisa & John M. Kihoro, 2012. "Influence of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Kenya¡¯s Manufacturing Firms Operating under East African Regional Integration," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(1), pages 299-319, February.
    6. Chonnatcha Kungwansupaphan & Jibon Kumar Sharma Leihaothabam, 2019. "Entrepreneurial Orientation, Performance And The Moderating Role Of Institutional Capital: A Case Study Of Female Entrepreneurs In Thailand," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(02), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Hasyim & Sahyar & Mahmud, 2017. "Isolating Mechanism as a Mean to Improve Performance of SMEs," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 594-612.
    8. Smirnov, Sergej & Cheberko, Eugeniy, 2018. "Current Stage of Entrepreneurship Development in Russia From 2014 Up To 2017: Main Issues and Trends," 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disruptive Change (Dubrovnik, 2018), in: 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disrupt, pages 344-355, Governance Research and Development Centre (CIRU), Zagreb.
    9. Sandeep Vij & Harpreet Singh Bedi, 2016. "Effect Of Organisational And Environmental Factors On Innovativeness And Business Performance Relationship," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-28, April.
    10. Rakesh Gupta & Sriparna Basu, 2014. "Influence of Dimensions of Strategic Orientation on the Growth of Small Firms and Resources as Moderating Variables," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 39(4), pages 461-476, November.
    11. Engelen, Andreas & Brettel, Malte & Wiest, Gregor, 2012. "Cross-functional Integration and New Product Performance — The Impact of National and Corporate Culture," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 52-65.
    12. Schneider, Markus & Engelen, Andreas, 2015. "Enemy or friend? The cultural impact of cross-functional behavior on the EO–performance link," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 439-453.
    13. Banerjee, Saikat & Karna, Amit & Sharma, Sunil, 2022. "Imprinting effects of exposure to the Indian independence movement on export intensity of firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 548-557.
    14. Chabaud, Didier & Sattin, Jean-François, 2019. "Back to the roots! Testing Miller's entrepreneurial orientation construct using Sono-Leontief conditions," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 11(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Deutscher, Franziska & Zapkau, Florian B. & Schwens, Christian & Baum, Matthias & Kabst, Ruediger, 2016. "Strategic orientations and performance: A configurational perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 849-861.
    16. Andrea Buratti & Giancarlo Ferrero, 2017. "Empirical evidence of Entrepreneurial Marketing Orientation from Italian firms," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(4), pages 151-173.
    17. Ilhami Yucel, 2011. "Entrepreneurial orientation, executives individualism and Firm Performance: The moderating role of executives individualism," Far East Journal of Psychology and Business, Far East Research Centre, vol. 5(3), pages 63-77, December.
    18. Zhongfeng Su & En Xie & Dong Wang & Yuan Li, 2011. "Entrepreneurial strategy making, resources, and firm performance: evidence from China," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 235-247, February.
    19. Michael H. Morris & Justin W. Webb & Rebecca J. Franklin, 2011. "Understanding the Manifestation of Entrepreneurial Orientation in the Nonprofit Context," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(5), pages 947-971, September.
    20. Feifei Jiang & Gang Wang & Xu Jiang, 2019. "Entrepreneurial orientation and organizational knowledge creation: A configurational approach," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 1193-1219, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    entrepreneurship; business ecosystem; regional entrepreneurial ecosystem; regional context; configuration approach.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O17 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.