IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arjebs/v15y2023i4p69-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Strategy Implementation on the Performance of Ugandan State Agencies: A Quantitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Arthur Nuwagaba
  • Caren Angima
  • Lydia Kisekka Namateefu
  • Tom Mugizi

Abstract

This study examines how strategy implementation affects Ugandan state agencies’ performance. It conceptualizes strategy implementation as operationalization and institutionalization, and measures performance by efficiency and effectiveness. This study surveyed 160 state agencies using a cross-sectional design and a structured questionnaire. The top management team (TMT) members of each agency, including CEO/Managing Director, Deputy/Assistant CEO, Corporation Secretary, and Heads of Department, were the respondents. At least three TMT members from each agency participated in the online survey, which was chosen due to the COVID-19 restrictions. The data analysis methods were factor analysis, descriptive, and multilinear regression analysis. The study adhered to the ethical principles of informed consent, confidentiality, and anonymity. Ugandan state agencies perform better when they implement their strategies effectively. The statistical analysis reveals that institutionalization is a key driver of performance outcomes, with a positive and highly significant coefficient (p < 0.000). On the other hand, operationalization has a positive but insignificant coefficient (p = 0.140), indicating a weak link between operationalization and performance. These findings highlight the importance of aligning the strategy with the organization’s internal environment. The study provides invaluable contribution the realm of strategic management, particularly within the public sector, focusing primarily on the performance of state agencies in Uganda. It is groundbreaking research that explores this relationship in a developing country. It methodically examines the profound effect that the execution of various strategies has on these entities. This study contributes to the strategic management literature in the public domain. The insights and recommendations derived from this study are valuable for professionals and policymakers involved in creating and implementing strategic plans within the public sector. This study offers practical and theoretical contributions for strategy implementation and performance in public sector contexts. It suggests that state agency managers and policymakers should foster a supportive culture, enhance leadership skills, facilitate communication channels, allocate adequate resources, and adapt to environmental changes to improve strategy execution and outcomes. It also adds to the literature on strategic management in public sector contexts, especially in developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Arthur Nuwagaba & Caren Angima & Lydia Kisekka Namateefu & Tom Mugizi, 2023. "The Impact of Strategy Implementation on the Performance of Ugandan State Agencies: A Quantitative Study," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 15(4), pages 69-86.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnd:arjebs:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:69-86
    DOI: 10.22610/jebs.v15i4(J).3653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/jebs/article/view/3653/2383
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/jebs/article/view/3653
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22610/jebs.v15i4(J).3653?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Kiragu & John Muhoho & Paul Omato Gesimba, 2020. "Influence of innovation in strategy implementation on organizational performance: A Case of Unga Holdings Limited, Kenya," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(5), pages 48-57, September.
    2. repec:idb:brikps:79941 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Sunil Kumar & Rachita Gulati, 2010. "Measuring efficiency, effectiveness and performance of Indian public sector banks," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 59(1), pages 51-74, January.
    4. Scott L. Newbert, 2007. "Empirical research on the resource‐based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 121-146, February.
    5. Mark H. Hansen & Lee T. Perry & C. Shane Reese, 2004. "A Bayesian operationalization of the resource‐based view," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(13), pages 1279-1295, December.
    6. Sunil Kumar & Rachita Gulati, 2010. "Measuring efficiency, effectiveness and performance of Indian public sector banks," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 59(1), pages 51-74, January.
    7. Charles Lusthaus & Fred Carden & Marie-Hélène Adrien & Gary Anderson & George Plinio Montalván, 2002. "Organizational Assessment: A Framework for Improving Performance," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 79941, February.
    8. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    9. Rose N. Mkalama & Vincent N. Machuki, 2019. "Top Management Demographics and Performance: An Empirical Investigation of Kenyan State Corporations," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    11. Lusthaus, Charles & Carden, Fred & Adrien, Marie-Hélène & Anderson, Gary & Montalván, George Plinio, 2002. "Organizational Assessment: A Framework for Improving Performance," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 446, November.
    12. Graham Hubbard, 2009. "Measuring organizational performance: beyond the triple bottom line," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 177-191, March.
    13. Mouzas, Stefanos, 2006. "Efficiency versus effectiveness in business networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(10-11), pages 1124-1132, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jim Andersén, 2023. "Green resource orchestration: A critical appraisal of the use of resource orchestration in environmental management research, and a research agenda for future study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5506-5520, December.
    2. Judith Cavazos-Arroyo & Rogelio Puente-Diaz, 2019. "The Influence of Marketing Capability in Mexican Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Haili Zhang & Yufan Wang & Michael Song, 2019. "Does Competitive Intensity Moderate the Relationships between Sustainable Capabilities and Sustainable Organizational Performance in New Ventures?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Ante Glavas & Jenny Mish, 2015. "Resources and Capabilities of Triple Bottom Line Firms: Going Over Old or Breaking New Ground?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 623-642, March.
    5. João José M. Ferreira & Cristina I. Fernandes & Vanessa Ratten, 2016. "A co-citation bibliometric analysis of strategic management research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(1), pages 1-32, October.
    6. David T. Merrett, 2020. "The Making of Australia's Supermarket Duopoly, 1958–2000," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 301-321, November.
    7. Lin, Yini & Wu, Lei-Yu, 2014. "Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 407-413.
    8. Jean D. Kabongo & Olivier Boiral, 2017. "Doing More with Less: Building Dynamic Capabilities for Eco‐Efficiency," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(7), pages 956-971, November.
    9. Xiaoming He & Yaqun Yi & Zelong Wei, 2019. "New product development capabilities in China: the moderating role of TMT cooperative behavior," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(2), pages 73-97, April.
    10. Sok, Phyra & O’Cass, Aron & Sok, Keo Mony, 2013. "Achieving superior SME performance: Overarching role of marketing, innovation, and learning capabilities," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 161-167.
    11. Lawton, Thomas & Rajwani, Tazeeb & Doh, Jonathan, 2013. "The antecedents of political capabilities: A study of ownership, cross-border activity and organization at legacy airlines in a deregulatory context," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 228-242.
    12. Baraldi, Enrico & Gressetvold, Espen & Harrison, Debbie, 2012. "Resource interaction in inter-organizational networks: Foundations, comparison, and a research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 266-276.
    13. Alfredo De Massis & Josip Kotlar & Mike Wright & Franz W. Kellermanns, 2018. "Sector-Based Entrepreneurial Capabilities and the Promise of Sector Studies in Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(1), pages 3-23, January.
    14. Alina Neamtu Idorasi & Stelian Stancu & Oana Madalina Popescu & Ionut Constantin, 2019. "The customer perspective – an effective and efficient way to differentiate for companies in the globalization era," Manager Journal, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 30(1), pages 31-51, December.
    15. Phong Nguyen, Nguyen & Adomako, Samuel & Ahsan, Mujtaba, 2023. "The base-of- the-pyramid orientation and export performance of Vietnamese small and medium enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    16. Yew Wong, Chee & Karia, Noorliza, 2010. "Explaining the competitive advantage of logistics service providers: A resource-based view approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 51-67, November.
    17. Cristina Fernandes & João J. Ferreira & Mário L. Raposo & Cristina Estevão & Marta Peris-Ortiz & Carlos Rueda-Armengot, 2017. "The dynamic capabilities perspective of strategic management: a co-citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 529-555, July.
    18. Hui Feng & Neil A. Morgan & Lopo L. Rego, 2017. "Firm capabilities and growth: the moderating role of market conditions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 76-92, January.
    19. Mohamed Mansouri & Cheklekbire Malainine & Hayat Souti & Ikram Cadimi, 2022. "Dynamic capabilities, competitiveness and performance of small and medium-sized enterprises: a systematic literature review [Capacités dynamiques, compétitivité et performance des petites et moyenn," Post-Print hal-03794567, HAL.
    20. Liu, Yulong & Ndubisi, Nelson Oly & Liu, Yang & Barrane, Fatima Zahra, 2020. "New product development and sustainable performance of Chinese SMMEs: The role of dynamic capability and intra-national environmental forces," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arjebs:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:69-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Tayyab (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/jebs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.