IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfb/journl/v16y2024i2p167-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Mental Accounting Matter in Portfolio Management? A Prospect Theory Application

Author

Listed:
  • Paritosh Chandra Sinha

Abstract

Do the propositions of mental accounting matter in investors’ portfolio management? In assisting the investors in their portfolio management, this study explores if the separation principle in mental accounting (MA) can be applied in their portfolio decision choices. It also examines if investors prefer an individual stock to the portfolio of stocks for investments. With the use of daily market prices data during a twenty-year time period for nine NSE Nifty sample stocks and their portfolio as well, this study applies the prospect theory (PT) decision references in the non-linear autoregressive distributive lag (NARDL) models. It also performs robustness checks with t-tests for differences between the coefficient magnitudes in the models. At PT implications with the variables for market premium, systematic beta and isolation effects, the separation principle of the MA theory matters in the portfolio management for stocks’ returns and market return. Investors’ psychological effect is found to contribute to their preferences amongst the sample stocks for their inclusion in the portfolio. Ingenious applications of the PT views on MA in portfolio management reveal the presence of synchronicity in terms of long-memory and short-memory effects on returns of the stocks and portfolio as well. Even if the generalizability of the stated findings is subject to its sample size, this empirical exploration with the Indian stocks market data shows original contribution in mental accounting and its use to explain the equity premium puzzle could enhance its applicative value.

Suggested Citation

  • Paritosh Chandra Sinha, 2024. "Does Mental Accounting Matter in Portfolio Management? A Prospect Theory Application," The Review of Finance and Banking, Academia de Studii Economice din Bucuresti, Romania / Facultatea de Finante, Asigurari, Banci si Burse de Valori / Catedra de Finante, vol. 16(2), pages 167-195, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfb:journl:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:167-195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rfb.ase.ro/articole/RFB_2024V2_art_1.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marie-Hélène Broihanne & Maxime Merli & Patrick Roger, 2008. "Solving some financial puzzles with prospect theory and mental accounting : a survey," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 118(4), pages 475-512.
    2. Nicholas Barberis & Ming Huang, 2008. "Stocks as Lotteries: The Implications of Probability Weighting for Security Prices," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(5), pages 2066-2100, December.
    3. Sandeep Baliga & Jeffrey C. Ely, 2011. "Mnemonomics: The Sunk Cost Fallacy as a Memory Kludge," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 3(4), pages 35-67, November.
    4. Manel Baucells & Woonam Hwang, 2017. "A Model of Mental Accounting and Reference Price Adaptation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(12), pages 4201-4218, December.
    5. Nicholas Barberis & Abhiroop Mukherjee & Baolian Wang, 2016. "Prospect Theory and Stock Returns: An Empirical Test," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 29(11), pages 3068-3107.
    6. Nicholas Barberis & Lawrence J. Jin & Baolian Wang, 2021. "Prospect Theory and Stock Market Anomalies," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 76(5), pages 2639-2687, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Felix Reichenbach & Martin Walther, 2023. "Financial recommendations on Reddit, stock returns and cumulative prospect theory," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 421-448, June.
    2. Alexander L. Brown & Taisuke Imai & Ferdinand M. Vieider & Colin F. Camerer, 2024. "Meta-analysis of Empirical Estimates of Loss Aversion," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(2), pages 485-516, June.
    3. Jun Yuan & Qi Xu & Ying Wang, 2023. "Probability weighting in commodity futures markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(4), pages 516-548, April.
    4. Ao, Zhiming & Ji, Xinru & Liang, Xinxin, 2023. "Can prospect theory explain anomalies in the Chinese stock market?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PB).
    5. Wang, Junbo & Wu, Chunchi & Zhong, Xiaoling, 2021. "Prospect theory and stock returns: Evidence from foreign share markets," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    6. Zhang, Manqing & Ma, Yao & Yang, Baochen & Fan, Ying, 2024. "The change in salience and the cross-section of stock returns: Empirical evidence from China A-shares," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    7. Gupta, Nilesh & Mishra, Anil V & Jacob, Joshy, 2022. "Prospect theory preferences and global mutual fund flows," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    8. Díaz, Antonio & Esparcia, Carlos & Alonso, Daniel & Alonso, Maria-Teresa, 2024. "Portfolio management of ESG-labeled energy companies based on PTV and ESG factors," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Mohrschladt, Hannes, 2021. "The ordering of historical returns and the cross-section of subsequent returns," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    10. Lee A. Smales & Zhangxin (Frank) Liu & Cameron D. Robertson, 2022. "One session options: Playing the announcement lottery?," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(2), pages 192-211, February.
    11. Jakusch, Sven Thorsten, 2017. "On the applicability of maximum likelihood methods: From experimental to financial data," SAFE Working Paper Series 148, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2017.
    12. Adam Zaremba & Jacob Koby Shemer, 2018. "Price-Based Investment Strategies," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-91530-2, March.
    13. Stephen G Dimmock & Roy Kouwenberg & Olivia S Mitchell & Kim Peijnenburg, 2021. "Household Portfolio Underdiversification and Probability Weighting: Evidence from the Field," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(9), pages 4524-4563.
    14. Hu, Shiyang & Xiang, Cheng & Quan, Xiaofeng, 2023. "Salience theory and mutual fund flows: Empirical evidence from China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    15. Yao, Jing & Zheng, Zexin, 2021. "Costly arbitrage and skewness pricing: Evidence from first-day price limit reform in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    16. Matyska, Branka, 2021. "Salience, systemic risk and spectral risk measures as capital requirements," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    17. Baars, Maren & Mohrschladt, Hannes, 2021. "An alternative behavioral explanation for the MAX effect," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 868-886.
    18. Chen, Chun & He, Fangyi & Lin, Lei, 2024. "Anchoring effect, prospect value and stock return," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA), pages 1539-1556.
    19. Alkan, Ulas & Guner, Biliana, 2018. "Preferences for lottery stocks at Borsa Istanbul," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 211-223.
    20. Wang, Huijun & Yan, Jinghua & Yu, Jianfeng, 2017. "Reference-dependent preferences and the risk–return trade-off," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 395-414.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfb:journl:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:167-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tatu Lucian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ffasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.