IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v9y2020i2p50-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why does task conflict influence team creativity? The role of team reflexivity

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Kamran Khan

    (School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China)

  • Maria Shafi

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.)

  • Shakeel Khan

    (nstitute of Management Studies, University of Peshawar, Pakistan)

  • Waseem Khan

    (Iqra National University, Peshawar, Pakistan)

Abstract

Although task conflict is usually seen to be beneficial to team creativity, the relationship is still unclear because of the mixed results. This research investigated why task conflicts resulted in some positive outcomes in terms of team creativity. Drawing on minority dissent theory, this study examined the conflict-creativity relationship by focusing on the mediating role of team reflexivity. We collected the sample data from 338 employees and 67 supervisors (67 teams) across three different sectors (banking, pharmaceuticals, and insurance) in Pakistan to support our hypotheses. We used bootstrapping analysis and the Sobel test to check for the mediation analysis. The results indicated that task conflict increases team reflexivity, team reflexivity facilitated team creativity, and thus, task conflict positively influenced team creativity via team reflexivity. The theoretical and practical implications of this study plus future directions are further discussed. Key Words:Task conflict, Team reflexivity, Team creativity

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Kamran Khan & Maria Shafi & Shakeel Khan & Waseem Khan, 2020. "Why does task conflict influence team creativity? The role of team reflexivity," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(2), pages 50-58, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:50-58
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i2.631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i2.631
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/631/528
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i2.631?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajagopal, 2014. "Organizations and Innovation," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 3, pages 58-86, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Kevyn Yong & Stephen J. Sauer & Elizabeth A. Mannix, 2014. "Conflict and Creativity in Interdisciplinary Teams," Post-Print hal-01025957, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lukasz Derdowski & Torvald Øgaard & Einar Marnburg & Gro Ellen Mathisen, 2018. "Creative and innovative behaviours of corporate directors: an elusive role of task-related conflicts," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(4), pages 1045-1069, December.
    2. Kristina Sisyuk, 2018. "Training, knowledge, competence, performance: what is the relationship?," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 4(6), pages 297-312.
    3. Yingxin Deng & Weipeng Lin & Guiquan Li, 2022. "When and How Does Team Task Conflict Spark Team Innovation? A Contingency Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(3), pages 745-761, December.
    4. Meinel, Martin & Eismann, Tobias T. & Baccarella, Christian V. & Fixson, Sebastian K. & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2020. "Does applying design thinking result in better new product concepts than a traditional innovation approach? An experimental comparison study," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 661-671.
    5. Alba Manresa & Andrea Bikfalvi & Alexandra Simon, 2018. "The Use And Determinants Of Training And Development For Creativity And Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(07), pages 1-28, October.
    6. Wang Kai, 2019. "Towards a Taxonomy of Idea Generation Techniques," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 65-80, January.
    7. Johan Miörner, 2019. "Contextualizing system agency in new path development: What factors shape regional reconfiguration capacity?," PEGIS geo-disc-2019_13, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    8. Lirios Alos-Simo & Antonio J. Verdu-Jover & Jose M. Gomez-Gras, 2020. "Knowledge Transfer in Sustainable Contexts: A Comparative Analysis of Periods of Financial Recession and Expansion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, June.
    9. Rudolf Wawrzyniec & Yusupova Almira, 2015. "Relational Resources As A Source Of Regional Competitive Advantage. Illustrated By The Examples Of The Lodzkie Voivodship And The Novosibirsk Oblast / Zasoby Relacyjne Jako Źródło Przewagi Konkurencyj," Comparative Economic Research, Sciendo, vol. 18(3), pages 115-137, August.
    10. Vitaliy Roud & Thomas Wolfgang Thurner, 2018. "The Influence of State‐Ownership on Eco‐Innovations in Russian Manufacturing Firms," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1213-1227, October.
    11. Valeriy Makarov & Albert Bakhtizin, 2014. "The Estimation Of The Regions’ Efficiency Of The Russian Federation Including The Intellectual Capital, The Characteristics Of Readiness For Innovation, Level Of Well-Being, And Quality Of Life," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(4), pages 9-30.
    12. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    13. Rakhshan Ummar & Sharjeel Saleem, 2020. "Thematic Ideation: A Superior Supplementary Concept in Creativity and Innovation," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, August.
    14. Nadežda Jankelová & Zuzana Joniaková & Juraj Mišún, 2021. "Innovative Work Behavior—A Key Factor in Business Performance? The Role of Team Cognitive Diversity and Teamwork Climate in This Relationship," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Yue Zhao & Ronaldo Parente & Stav Fainshmidt & Steven Carnovale, 2021. "MNE host-country alliance network position and post-entry establishment mode choice," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(7), pages 1350-1364, September.
    16. Hsing-Yuan Liu, 2022. "The Moderating Role of Team Conflict on Teams of Nursing Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-11, March.
    17. Asare Yaw Obeng & Peter L Mkhize, 2017. "Operational Risk, Bank Size and the Financial Performance of Commercial Banks in Kenya," International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 6(3), pages 51-69, April.
    18. Kuklytė Jūratė & Vveinhardt Jolita, 2017. "Maximization of Created Social Value: Social Business Models and Their Application Tendencies in Lithuania," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 77(1), pages 57-79, June.
    19. Chryssoula Pentheroudakis & Justus A. Baron, 2016. "Licensing Terms of Standard Essential Patents: A Comprehensive Analysis of Cases," JRC Research Reports JRC104068, Joint Research Centre.
    20. Beatrice d'Ippolito, 2014. "The importance of design for firms' competitiveness: a review of the literature," Working Papers hal-00936947, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:50-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.