IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v11y2022i2p42-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relevance of the notion for all publicity is good publicity: The influencing factors in the 21st century

Author

Listed:
  • Kenichi Jogel Pacis

    (University of Santo Tomas)

  • Maria Angela Almendrala

    (University of Santo Tomas)

  • Rica Jade Paitone

    (University of Santo Tomas)

  • Antonio Etrata Jr.

    (University of Santo Tomas)

Abstract

In the age of technology and a competitive market within the Philippines, an adverse stance or aftereffects of a situation have a significant impact on the sensibility of the audiences and are likely to prompt either positive or negative reactions from them. However, in the marketing and advertising sectors, the belief "All Publicity is Good Publicity" is well-known, which states that any form of publicity is fine as long as it cultivates presence and visibility. To be able to determine whether the notion is still highly appropriate in the 21st century and to provide a definite difference between good and bad publicity, the researchers have used a mixed-method approach and employed the use of quasi-experiment and short Focus Group Discussion (FGD) instruments for forty (40) participants under the Generation Z demographic group in Metro Manila. The researchers have also chosen six (6) business owners, advertisers, or managers within the metro for personal interviews in order to identify the perspective of both parties. Overall, the results show that the notion is no longer very relevant. According to the four influencing factors, defiance of advertising ethics does not always result in negative press, but non-compliance with corporate social responsibility (CSR), controversial advertising and situations, and corporate scandals do. It is important to highlight that every advertising or activity must be well-planned since there is a clear difference between good and poor exposure. Key Words:Advertising Ethics, Controversial Advertising, Corporate Scandal, Corporate Social Responsibility, Publicity

Suggested Citation

  • Kenichi Jogel Pacis & Maria Angela Almendrala & Rica Jade Paitone & Antonio Etrata Jr., 2022. "The relevance of the notion for all publicity is good publicity: The influencing factors in the 21st century," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(2), pages 42-56, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:42-56
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i2.1687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/1687/1183
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i2.1687
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i2.1687?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Einwiller, Sabine & Lis, Bettina & Ruppel, Christopher & Sen, Sankar, 2019. "When CSR-based identification backfires: Testing the effects of CSR-related negative publicity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-13.
    2. Caroline Moraes & Nina Michaelidou, 2017. "Introduction to the Special Thematic Symposium on the Ethics of Controversial Online Advertising," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 231-233, March.
    3. Bang Nguyen & T. C. Melewar & Junsong Chen, 2013. "A Framework of Brand Likeability : An Exploratory Study of Likeability in Firm-Level Brands," Post-Print hal-02312296, HAL.
    4. Dutta, Sujay & Pullig, Chris, 2011. "Effectiveness of corporate responses to brand crises: The role of crisis type and response strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(12), pages 1281-1287.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefanie Wannow & Martin Haupt & Martin Ohlwein, 2024. "Is brand activism an emotional affair? The role of moral emotions in consumer responses to brand activism," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(2), pages 168-192, March.
    2. Cambier, Fanny & Poncin, Ingrid, 2020. "Inferring brand integrity from marketing communications: The effects of brand transparency signals in a consumer empowerment context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 260-270.
    3. Dutta, Sujay & Pullig, Chris, 2015. "A commentary on reporting effect size and confidence intervals: Response to Palmer and Strelan (2014)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 1082-1085.
    4. Tarunija Chandra & Vibhuti Tripathi, 2023. "Antecedents and Mediators for Building and Integrated Research Framework towards Successful Brand Revitalisation," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(1), pages 133-163.
    5. Paul, Justin, 2019. "Masstige model and measure for brand management," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 299-312.
    6. Haiying Wei & Yaxuan Ran, 2019. "Male Versus Female: How the Gender of Apologizers Influences Consumer Forgiveness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 371-387, January.
    7. Ali Besharat & Kimberly A. Whitler & Saim Kashmiri, 2024. "When CEO Pay Becomes a Brand Problem," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(4), pages 941-973, April.
    8. Hansen, Nele & Kupfer, Ann-Kristin & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten, 2018. "Brand crises in the digital age: The short- and long-term effects of social media firestorms on consumers and brands," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 557-574.
    9. Joanna Sawicka & Elżbieta Marcinkowska, 2023. "Environmental CSR and the Purchase Declarations of Generation Z Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Robbins, J.A. & Franks, B. & Weary, D.M. & von Keyserlingk, M.A.G., 2016. "Awareness of ag-gag laws erodes trust in farmers and increases support for animal welfare regulations," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 121-125.
    11. Hyunju Shin & Riza Casidy & Alyssa Yoon & So-Hyang Yoon, 2016. "Brand trust and avoidance following brand crisis: A quasi-experiment on the effect of franchisor statements," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(5), pages 1-23, September.
    12. Rajat Kumar Behera & Pradip Kumar Bala & Nripendra P. Rana & Hatice Kizgin, 2022. "A Techno-Business Platform to Improve Customer Experience Following the Brand Crisis Recovery: A B2B Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 2027-2051, December.
    13. Baudier, Patricia & Ammi, Chantal & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2022. "Impact of advertising on users’ perceptions regarding the Internet of things," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 355-366.
    14. Tan, Teck Ming & Balaji, M.S. & Oikarinen, Eeva-Liisa & Alatalo, Sari & Salo, Jari, 2021. "Recover from a service failure: The differential effects of brand betrayal and brand disappointment on an exclusive brand offering," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 126-139.
    15. Ganganee C. Samaraweera & Chongguang Li & Ping Qing, 2014. "Mitigating Product Harm Crises and Making Markets Sustainable: How does National Culture Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-16, May.
    16. Kashmiri, Saim & Brower, Jacob, 2016. "Oops! I did it again: Effect of corporate governance and top management team characteristics on the likelihood of product-harm crises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 621-630.
    17. Paydas Turan, Ceyda, 2022. "Deal or deny: The effectiveness of crisis response strategies on brand equity of the focal brand in co-branding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 615-629.
    18. Zimmer, Lukas & Swoboda, Bernhard, 2023. "Perceived corporate social responsibility effects across nations – The role of national institutions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(3).
    19. Zou, Peng & Li, Guofeng, 2016. "How emerging market investors' value competitors' customer equity: Brand crisis spillover in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3765-3771.
    20. Huang, Ran & Ha, Sejin, 2020. "The effects of warmth-oriented and competence-oriented service recovery messages on observers on online platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 616-627.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:42-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.