IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rau/journl/v8y2013i4p38-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Containers And Their Effect In Durres Port

Author

Listed:
  • Osman Metalla

    (Economic Faculty of Tirana University)

  • Andri Koxhaj

    (Economic Faculty of Tirana University)

Abstract

Since the introduction of containerization, container throughput in the world has continuously increased. Today more than 90% of the world cargoes are transported by sea, and containerized cargoes are increasing year after year. The above tendency of world container transportation has given a significant impact on Albanian ports as well and especially in the port of Durres. Durres port is the main gateway of Albania, where more than 85% of the seaborne cargoes go through this port. During the recent years, the volume of general cargo that has been handled in this port has been gradually reduced and instead, a continuous and rapid growth of containerized cargoes has been observed. In order to have an effective and productive terminal, a number of factors need to be studied, because the higher the terminal productivity, the higher the difference between the revenues and the costs will be. There are a number of factors to be considered like port congestion, traffic management and safety aspects in the terminal. This paper gives an overall picture of various operations in Durres port containers terminal. Since this port is very new in containers handling operations, and the container traffic forecast is optimistic, there are a number of issues to be addressed in order to make the Port of Durres an adequate port, able to handle the containerized cargo in the future as well as to be a competitive port in the region. Development of the container terminal,improvement of port facility and port performance, application of technology and information systems,increasing the quality of services are key factors for developing the Durres port container terminal on severe regional container port competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Osman Metalla & Andri Koxhaj, 2013. "Containers And Their Effect In Durres Port," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 8(4), pages 38-47, december.
    • Handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:4:p:38-47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/journl/WI13/REBE-WI13-A3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khalid Bichou & Richard Gray, 2004. "A logistics and supply chain management approach to port performance measurement," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 47-67, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chin-Shan Lu & Kuo-Chung Shang & Chi-Chang Lin, 2016. "Examining sustainability performance at ports: port managers’ perspectives on developing sustainable supply chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 909-927, November.
    2. Brinker, Janosch & Haasis, Hans-Dietrich, 2020. "The impact of an asymmetric allocation of power on the digitalization strategy of port logistics," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferen, volume 30, pages 457-484, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    3. Wang, Ping & Mileski, Joan & Zeng, Qingcheng, 2019. "Toward a taxonomy of container terminals’ practices and performance: A contingency and configuration study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 92-107.
    4. Shi, Xin & Jiang, Haizhou & Li, Huan & Wang, Ying, 2020. "Upgrading port-originated maritime clusters: Insights from Shanghai's experience," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 19-32.
    5. Niamat Ullah Ibne Hossain & Farjana Nur & Raed Jaradat & Seyedmohsen Hosseini & Mohammad Marufuzzaman & Stephen M. Puryear & Randy K. Buchanan, 2019. "Metrics for Assessing Overall Performance of Inland Waterway Ports: A Bayesian Network Based Approach," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-17, May.
    6. Leonie C.E. Stevens & Iris F.A. Vis, 2016. "Port supply chain integration: analyzing biofuel supply chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 261-279, April.
    7. Birdoğan Baki & Nermin Abuasad, 2020. "The Evaluation of Humanitarian Supply Chain Performance Based On Balanced Scorecard-DEMATEL Approach," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 8(2), pages 163-180, December.
    8. Heaver, Trevor, 2006. "The Evolution and Challenges of Port Economics," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 11-41, January.
    9. Ha, Min-Ho & Yang, Zaili & Notteboom, Theo & Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Heo, Man-Wook, 2017. "Revisiting port performance measurement: A hybrid multi-stakeholder framework for the modelling of port performance indicators," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 1-16.
    10. Zheng, Shiyuan & Ge, Ying-En & Fu, Xiaowen & (Marco) Nie, Yu & Xie, Chi, 2020. "Demand information sharing in port concession arrangements," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 118-143.
    11. Jagan Jeevan & Shu-Ling Chen & Stephen Cahoon, 2018. "Determining the influential factors of dry port operations: worldwide experiences and empirical evidence from Malaysia," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(3), pages 476-494, September.
    12. Bichou, Khalid, 2006. "Chapter 24 Review of Port Performance Approaches and a Supply Chain Framework to Port Performance Benchmarking," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 567-598, January.
    13. Weihua Liu & Xinran Shen & Di Wang, 2020. "The impacts of dual overconfidence behavior and demand updating on the decisions of port service supply chain: a real case study from China," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 565-604, August.
    14. Vìra Pelantová & Eva Šlaichová, 2017. "The Contribution to the Integration of Management Systems Oriented to the Sustainable and TQM," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(S11), pages 951-951.
    15. Brooks, Mary R., 2006. "Chapter 25 Issues in Measuring Port Devolution Program Performance: A Managerial Perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 599-629, January.
    16. Su-Han Woo & Stephen Pettit & Anthony Beresford & Dong-Wook Kwak, 2012. "Seaport Research: A Decadal Analysis of Trends and Themes Since the 1980s," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 351-377, January.
    17. Kevin Cullinane (ed.), 2011. "International Handbook of Maritime Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13163.
    18. Felix Kin Peng Hui & Lu Aye & Colin F. Duffield, 2019. "Engaging Employees with Good Sustainability: Key Performance Indicators for Dry Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-11, May.
    19. Peter W. De Langen & Athanasios A. Pallis, 2005. "Analysis Of The Benefits Of Intra-Port Competition," Industrial Organization 0510003, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 17 Oct 2005.
    20. Neil M. Coe & Martin Hess, 2013. "Economic and social upgrading in global logistics," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series ctg-2013-38, GDI, The University of Manchester.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:4:p:38-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alex Tabusca (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferauro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.