IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rai/mamere/1861-9908_mrev_2010_3_reichel.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Strongest Link: Legitimacy of Top Management Diversity, Sex Stereotypes and the Rise of Women in Human Resource Management 1995 – 2004

Author

Listed:
  • Astrid Reichel
  • Julia Brandl
  • Wolfgang Mayrhofer

Abstract

Over the last decades, HRM scholars associated the inclusion of women into HRM with the occupation’s loss of status. Such views have difficulties to explain more recent developments in Europe that show a co-evolution of feminization and status increase of HRM. In this article, we review these developments and offer an explanation that accounts for them. Linking neo-institutional arguments with literature on sex stereotypes, we suggest that allocating women to HRM offers a solution for organizations to deal with growing demands for enhancing diversity within top management without giving up the traditional division of female and male work. We show how the patterns of the inclusion of women into HRM in 11 European countries between 1995 and 2004 support this explanation.

Suggested Citation

  • Astrid Reichel & Julia Brandl & Wolfgang Mayrhofer, 2010. "The Strongest Link: Legitimacy of Top Management Diversity, Sex Stereotypes and the Rise of Women in Human Resource Management 1995 – 2004," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 21(3), pages 332-352.
    • Handle: RePEc:rai:mamere:1861-9908_mrev_2010_3_reichel
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hampp-verlag.de/hampp_e-journals_mrev.htm#310
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anja Iseke & Kerstin Pull, 2019. "Female Executives and Perceived Employer Attractiveness: On the Potentially Adverse Signal of Having a Female CHRO Rather Than a Female CFO," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(4), pages 1113-1133, June.
    2. Igor Asanov & Maria Mavlikeeva, 2023. "Can group identity explain the gender gap in the recruitment process?," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 95-113, January.
    3. Hussein N. Ismail & Lama Nakkache, 2015. "Gender Differences at Work: Experiencing Human Resource Management Policies in Lebanese Firms," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(6), pages 907-919, December.
    4. Maimunah Ismail & Atikah Nadia Abd Rahim & Kim Hou Lee & Nurul Fariza Mohd Thahri, 2016. "Cultural Values And Career Goal Of Gen-X And Gen-Y Employees: Evidence From Selected Malaysian Companies," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 7(2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    HRM; occupational status; occupational feminization; sex stereotypes; institutional pressures;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
    • J23 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Demand
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • J71 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - Hiring and Firing
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rai:mamere:1861-9908_mrev_2010_3_reichel. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rainer Hampp (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hampp-verlag.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.