IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/reveco/reco_0035-2764_1982_num_33_1_408644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pouvoir de monopole et répartition salaires-profits

Author

Listed:
  • David Encaoua
  • Bernard Franck

Abstract

[fre] Monopole power and distributive shares . David Encaoua, Bernard Franck. Starting from the theory tvhich relates relative factor shares to monopoly power, we try here to explain cross-industrial variations in the distribution of value-added. The model is tested upon a sample of 270 french industries for the year 1974. In the first section, we show that relative shares are significantly linked with a set of market structure variables which are determinants of monopoly power. Notably, the share of gross profits is an increasing function of sellers concentration.. In the second section, we take into account the internal structure of industries. We distinguish industries where most firms are isolated and single-product from industries dominated by subsidiaries of large industrial groups. These groups constitue a form of organisation which seems to us similar to the U.S. multidivisionnal corporation. The relation previously tested is still observed in the first category of industries but does not work any more in the industries where groups are strongly implanted. It seems so that, in these industries, distributive shares are not influenced by market power variables but rather by the properties of the structural organization of industrial groups which enables them to capture benefits of internal coordination and to secure a higher share of value-addes. [eng] Monopole power and distributive shares . David Encaoua, Bernard Franck. Starting from the theory tvhich relates relative factor shares to monopoly power, we try here to explain cross-industrial variations in the distribution of value-added. The model is tested upon a sample of 270 french industries for the year 1974. In the first section, we show that relative shares are significantly linked with a set of market structure variables which are determinants of monopoly power. Notably, the share of gross profits is an increasing function of sellers concentration.. In the second section, we take into account the internal structure of industries. We distinguish industries where most firms are isolated and single-product from industries dominated by subsidiaries of large industrial groups. These groups constitue a form of organisation which seems to us similar to the U.S. multidivisionnal corporation. The relation previously tested is still observed in the first category of industries but does not work any more in the industries where groups are strongly implanted. It seems so that, in these industries, distributive shares are not influenced by market power variables but rather by the properties of the structural organization of industrial groups which enables them to capture benefits of internal coordination and to secure a higher share of value-addes.

Suggested Citation

  • David Encaoua & Bernard Franck, 1982. "Pouvoir de monopole et répartition salaires-profits," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 33(1), pages 107-131.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_1982_num_33_1_408644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/reco_0035-2764_1982_num_33_1_408644
    Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iwata, Gyoichi, 1974. "Measurement of Conjectural Variations in Oligopoly," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 42(5), pages 947-966, September.
    2. Jean-Pascal Simonin, 1980. "Indices de concentration, pouvoir de monopole et variations conjecturales : quelques extensions," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 31(1), pages 121-135.
    3. Newman, Howard H, 1978. "Strategic Groups and the Structure-Performance Relationship," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 60(3), pages 417-427, August.
    4. A. Michael Spence, 1977. "Entry, Capacity, Investment and Oligopolistic Pricing," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 8(2), pages 534-544, Autumn.
    5. Paolo Sylos-Labini, 1979. "Prices and Income Distribution in Manufacturing Industry," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 3-25, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fernández, Zulima, 2004. "La competencia dinámica entre pioneros y seguidores: aplicación al sector de la telefonía móvil en Europa," DEE - Documentos de Trabajo. Economía de la Empresa. DB db040805, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    2. Goo, Moon Mo, 1997. "The measurement of market power: short-run, long-run, and dynamic adjustment models," ISU General Staff Papers 1997010108000012985, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Brissimis, Sophocles N. & Delis, Manthos D., 2011. "Bank-level estimates of market power," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(3), pages 508-517, August.
    4. Xavier Martinez-Giralt & Barros Pedro Pita, 2005. "Bargaining and idle public sector capacity in health care," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 9(5), pages 1-8.
    5. Faouzi Bensebaa, 2003. "La dynamique concurrentielle:défis analytiques et méthodologiques," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 6(1), pages 5-37, March.
    6. Özlem Onaran & Engelbert Stockhammer, 2006. "The effect of FDI and foreign trade on wages in the Central and Eastern European Countries in the post-transition era: A sectoral analysis," Department of Economics Working Papers wuwp094, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Economics.
    7. Yuval Heller & Eyal Winter, 2020. "Biased-Belief Equilibrium," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 12(2), pages 1-40, May.
    8. Carroll, Charles, 1998. "Interdependence and the social structure of rivalry," Research Report 98B24, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    9. Michael Waldman, 1987. "Underinvestment in Entry Deterrence: When and Why," UCLA Economics Working Papers 456, UCLA Department of Economics.
    10. Ding, John Y., 1993. "Toward a Framework for Analyzing Multimarket Contact and Multinational Competition," Occasional Papers 233154, Regional Research Project NC-194: Organization and Performance of World Food Systems.
    11. Bagwell, Kyle & Wolinsky, Asher, 2002. "Game theory and industrial organization," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, in: R.J. Aumann & S. Hart (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 49, pages 1851-1895, Elsevier.
    12. David Bouras & Troy Frank & Eric Burgess, 2017. "Functional Forms and Oligopolistic Models: An Empirical Analysis," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(4), pages 645-649.
    13. Lu, Yuanzhu & Poddar, Sougata, 2005. "Mixed oligopoly and the choice of capacity," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 365-374, December.
    14. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/7o52iohb7k6srk09mit038srm is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Shaffer, Sherrill, 1984. "Firm size and the incentive to differentiate," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 81-85.
    16. Luciano Fanti & Nicola Meccheri, 2017. "Unionization Regimes, Capacity Choice by Firms and Welfare Outcomes," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 85(6), pages 661-681, December.
    17. Xiangyi Zhou & Zheng Pei & Botao Qin, 2021. "Assessing Market Competition in the Chinese Banking Industry Based on a Conjectural Variation Model," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 29(2), pages 73-98, March.
    18. Pedro Barros & Xavier Martinez-Giralt, 2005. "Negotiation Advantages of Professional Associations in Health Care," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 191-204, June.
    19. Fleischer, Manfred, 1998. "Patenting and industrial performance: the case of the machine tool industry," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Dynamics FS IV 98-9, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    20. Boyd, Roy G. & Jung, Chulho & Seldon, Barry J., 1995. "The market structure of the US aluminum industry," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 293-301, August.
    21. Felipe Balmaceda & Eduardo Saavedra, 2007. "Vertical Integration And Shared Facilities In Unregulated Industries," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 771-772, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_1982_num_33_1_408644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/reco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.