IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/recoru/ecoru_0013-0559_1991_num_205_1_4227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fonction des instruments économiques pour la réconciliation des politiques agricoles et environnementales suivant le principe pollueur-payeur

Author

Listed:
  • A.G. Conway

Abstract

[fre] Cet article recherche comment les instruments de politique économique peuvent aider à concilier les politiques agricoles et environnementales selon le principe pollueur payeur. L'évolution des droits de propriété et la dimension écologique de l'agriculture sont essentielles pour atténuer les incohérences apparentes entre les efficacités écologique et économique. L'évaluation des effets externes demeurant incertaine, il n'en demeure pas moins que les instruments économiques sont appelés de manière croissante dans la gestion de l'environnement et renforcent ainsi l'intégration effective des politiques agricoles et environnementales. [eng] This paper explores how economic policy instruments might contribute to reconciling agricultural and environmental policies, in accordance with the Polluter Pays Principle. It is suggested that this principle implies rewards for environmental improvements, as well as payments for environmental damage. It is argued that changes in property rights, and an ecological perspective on agricultural production, are essential to the elimination of the apparent inconsistency between ecological efficiency and economic efficiency. While the valuation of external effects is problematic, economic policy instruments are seen as having an important and increasing role in environmental management and as contributing to the integration of agricultural and environmental policies.

Suggested Citation

  • A.G. Conway, 1991. "Fonction des instruments économiques pour la réconciliation des politiques agricoles et environnementales suivant le principe pollueur-payeur," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 205(1), pages 44-52.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_1991_num_205_1_4227
    DOI: 10.3406/ecoru.1991.4227
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecoru.1991.4227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.1991.4227
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecoru_0013-0559_1991_num_205_1_4227
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecoru.1991.4227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    2. Hans Th. A. Bressers, 1988. "A Comparison Of The Effectiveness Of Incentives And Directives: The Case Of Dutch Water Quality Policy," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 7(3), pages 500-518, March.
    3. David Pearce, 1988. "Optimal Prices for Sustainable Development," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: David Collard & David Pearce & David Ulph (ed.), Economics, Growth and Sustainable Environments, chapter 5, pages 57-66, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Glover, Fred & Martinson, Fred, 1987. "Multiple-use land planning and conflict resolution by multiple objective linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 343-350, March.
    5. Hartwig De Haen, 1982. "Economic aspects of policies to control nitrate contamination resulting from agricultural production," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 9(4), pages 443-465.
    6. Helm, Dieter & Pearce, David W, 1990. "Assessment: Economic Policy towards the Environment," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, Spring.
    7. Tietenberg, T H, 1990. "Economic Instruments for Environmental Regulation," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 6(1), pages 17-33, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pascal Byé & Maria Fonte, 1993. "Towards science-based techniques in agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 10(2), pages 16-25, March.
    2. François Facchini, 1995. "La qualité de l’environnement, nouvel enjeu de la réforme de la politique agricole commune," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01350619, HAL.
    3. Bruno Romagny, 1996. "La taxation des pollutions agricoles. Le cas des moulins à huile dans les Alpes-Maritimes [Protection des milieux, aménagement en zone défavorisée et compétition transfrontalière ]," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 236(1), pages 37-45.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Halkos, George, 2000. "Determining optimal air quality standards: Quantities or prices?," MPRA Paper 42849, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Peifang Yang & Daniel T. Kaffine, 2016. "Community-Based Tradable Permits for Localized Pollution," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 65(4), pages 773-788, December.
    3. Joost Pennings & Willem Heijman & Matthew Meulenberg, 1997. "The Dimensions of Rights: A Classification of Environmental Rights and Production Rights," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 55-72, January.
    4. Cropper, Maureen L & Oates, Wallace E, 1992. "Environmental Economics: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 30(2), pages 675-740, June.
    5. Crabbé, Philippe, 1990. "Les économistes doivent-ils se mettre au vert?," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 66(3), pages 285-304, septembre.
    6. Asproudis, Elias & Weyman-Jones, Tom, 2011. "Third parties �participation in tradable permits market. Do we need them?," MPRA Paper 28766, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. repec:ilo:ilowps:290739 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Yi, Wen-Jing & Zou, Le-Le & Guo, Jie & Wang, Kai & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2011. "How can China reach its CO2 intensity reduction targets by 2020? A regional allocation based on equity and development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2407-2415, May.
    9. Georg Grüll & Luca Taschini, 2009. "A Comparison of Reduced-Form Permit Price Models and their Empirical Performances," Working Papers 0918, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.
    10. Xavier Delache & Sylviane Gastaldo, 1992. "Les instruments des politiques d'environnement," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 258(1), pages 27-34.
    11. Olmstead, Sheila & Richardson, Nathan, 2014. "Managing the Risks of Shale Gas Development Using Innovative Legal and Regulatory Approaches," RFF Working Paper Series dp-14-15, Resources for the Future.
    12. Luca Taschini, 2010. "Environmental Economics and Modeling Marketable Permits," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 17(4), pages 325-343, December.
    13. Jūratė Jaraitė-Kažukauskė & Andrius Kažukauskas, 2015. "Do Transaction Costs Influence Firm Trading Behaviour in the European Emissions Trading System?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 62(3), pages 583-613, November.
    14. Halkos, George, 1993. "Economic incentives for optimal sulphur abatement in Europe," MPRA Paper 33705, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Delmas, Magali & Marcus, Alfred, 2003. "Firms' Choice of Regulation Instruments to Reduce Pollution: A Tansaction Cost Approach," Research Papers 1806, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    16. repec:ilo:ilowps:293130 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Doeleman, Jacobus A., 1992. "Environmental policy: emerging practice and principles," ILO Working Papers 992931303402676, International Labour Organization.
    18. Fuentes Castro, D., 2012. "Funding for green growth," Working papers 392, Banque de France.
    19. Elias Asproudis & Thomas Weyman-Jones, 2020. "How the ENGOs Can Fight the Industrial/Business Lobby with Their Tools from Their Own Field? ENGOs Participation in Emissions Trading Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-13, October.
    20. Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido, 2002. "Political economics and public finance," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 24, pages 1549-1659, Elsevier.
    21. Qiuyue Xia & Lu Li & Jie Dong & Bin Zhang, 2021. "Reduction Effect and Mechanism Analysis of Carbon Trading Policy on Carbon Emissions from Land Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    22. Frans P. Vries & Nick Hanley, 2016. "Incentive-Based Policy Design for Pollution Control and Biodiversity Conservation: A Review," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(4), pages 687-702, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_1991_num_205_1_4227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecoru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.