IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_2015_num_481_1_10635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Projections du coût de l’APA et des caractéristiques de ses bénéficiaires à l’horizon 2040 à l’aide du modèle Destinie

Author

Listed:
  • Claire Marbot
  • Delphine Roy

Abstract

[fre] Confrontés au vieillissement de leur population, les pays développés s’attendent à devoir fournir une aide à un nombre croissant de personnes âgées dépendantes et il est nécessaire d’anticiper ce que coûtera leur prise en charge. Le modèle de microsimulation des retraites Destinie a été étendu en 2011 de façon à permettre ce type de projection, dans le cadre du débat national sur la dépendance. Pour cet exercice, la microsimulation présente l’avantage de simuler des trajectoires au niveau individuel. Ceci permet de projeter les agrégats en tenant compte de l’évolution dans le temps de la distribution des caractéristiques individuelles. Ceci permet aussi la prise en compte de barèmes complexes (non linéaires) qui demandent un calcul au niveau individuel. Cet article présente la méthode mise en oeuvre pour construire ce module dépendance et les principaux résultats de l’exercice conduit en 2011, enrichi d’une variante macroéconomique moins favorable que celle qui avait été retenue à l’époque. Une première série de résultats concerne la caractérisation de la population des dépendants et la présence d’aidants potentiels, sous trois scénarios de prévalence de la dépendance. Dans un deuxième temps, on présente des projections financières de l’Allocation personnalisée d’autonomie (APA) qui croisent ces trois scénarios de prévalence avec les deux hypothèses macroéconomiques et deux hypothèses d’indexation du barème de cette prestation. Le montant total de l’APA représenterait entre 0,54 et 0,71 point du PIB à l’horizon 2040, selon le degré d’optimisme du scénario, contre 0,4 point de PIB en 2010. La part de ce montant prise en charge par les collectivités locales représenterait entre 0,29 et 0,51 point de PIB, contre 0,27 point en 2010, le complément restant à la charge des ménages.

Suggested Citation

  • Claire Marbot & Delphine Roy, 2015. "Projections du coût de l’APA et des caractéristiques de ses bénéficiaires à l’horizon 2040 à l’aide du modèle Destinie," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 481(1), pages 185-209.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2015_num_481_1_10635
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.2015.10635
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.2015.10635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.2015.10635
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_2015_num_481_1_10635
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.2015.10635?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cécile Bourreau-Dubois & Agnès Gramain, 2014. "La solvabilisation des plans d'aide APA comme outil décentralisé d'assurance et de redistribution," Working Papers of BETA 2014-08, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    2. Carmichael, F. & Charles, S. & Hulme, C., 2010. "Who will care? Employment participation and willingness to supply informal care," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 182-190, January.
    3. Duée, Michel & Rebillard, Cyril & Pennec, Sophie, 2005. "Les personnes dépendantes en France : Evolution et prise en charge [Old-age disability in France: Long-term evolution, private caregiving and public expenditure]," MPRA Paper 69877, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Majer, I.M. & Nusselder, W.J. & Mackenbach, J.P. & Klijs, B. & Van Baal, P.H.M., 2011. "Mortality risk associated with disability: A population-based record linkage study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(12), pages 9-15.
    5. Audrey Sieurin & Emmanuelle Cambois & Jean-Marie Robine, 2011. "Les espérances de vie sans incapacité en France : une tendance récente moins favorable que dans le passé," Working Papers 170, Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED).
    6. M. Duée & C. Rebillard, 2004. "Old age disability in France: a long run projection," Documents de Travail de l'Insee - INSEE Working Papers g2004-02, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques.
    7. repec:hal:pseose:halshs-01379321 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Charlotte Geay & Grégoire de Lagasnerie & Makram Larguem, 2015. "Intégrer les dépenses de santé dans un modèle de microsimulation dynamique : le cas des dépenses de soins de ville," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 481(1), pages 211-234.
    2. François Legendre, 2019. "The Emergence and Consolidation of Microsimulation Methods in France," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 510-511-5, pages 201-217.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. C. Marbot & D. Roy, 2012. "Projecting the future cost of the French elderly disabled allowance using a microsimulation model," Documents de Travail de l'Insee - INSEE Working Papers g2012-10, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques.
    2. A. Cazenave-Lacroutz & F. Godet, 2017. "Projecting with the Destinie microsimulation model the post-retirement without any severe disabilities life expectancy of the generations born between 1960 and 1990," Documents de Travail de l'Insee - INSEE Working Papers g2017-03, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques.
    3. Maruyama, Shiko, 2015. "The effect of coresidence on parental health in Japan," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 1-22.
    4. McDonald, Rebecca & Powdthavee, Nattavudh, 2018. "The Shadow Prices of Voluntary Caregiving: Using Panel Data of Well-Being to Estimate the Cost of Informal Care," IZA Discussion Papers 11545, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Pierre Pestieau & Gregory Ponthière, 2012. "Long-Term Care Insurance Puzzle," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Joan Costa-Font & Christophe Courbage (ed.), Financing Long-Term Care in Europe, chapter 3, pages 41-52, Palgrave Macmillan.
    6. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5866 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. G�ng�r KARAKAYA, 2009. "Long-Term Care: Regional Disparities In Belgium," Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. 4(1(7)_ Spr).
    8. Hussein, Shereen, 2011. "The use of 'large scale datasets' in UK social care research," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 41194, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Heger, Dörte & Korfhage, Thorben, 2017. "Does the negative effect of caregiving on work persist over time?," Ruhr Economic Papers 703, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    10. Marianne Tenand, 2018. "Being dependent rather than handicapped in France: Does the institutional barrier at 60 affect care arrangements?," Working Papers halshs-01889452, HAL.
    11. Nuriye Sancar & Deniz Inan, 2018. "A novel method as a diagnostic tool for the detection of influential observations in the Cox proportional hazards model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 1253-1266, December.
    12. Costa-Font, Joan & Jiménez-Martín, Sergi & Vilaplana-Prieto, Cristina, 2022. "Do Public Caregiving Subsidies and Supports affect the Provision of Care and Transfers?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Irene Albarrán Lozano & Pablo J. Alonso-González & José Javier Núñez-Velázquez, 2021. "Estimation of Life Expectancy for Dependent Population in a Multi-State Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, October.
    14. Rellstab, Sara & Bakx, Pieter & García-Gómez, Pilar & van Doorslaer, Eddy, 2020. "The kids are alright - labour market effects of unexpected parental hospitalisations in the Netherlands," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    15. Alberto Pench, 2018. "Intra Generational Solidarity and Long Term Care: A Role for In Kind Transfers," ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 35-57.
    16. Ha Trong Nguyen & Luke B. Connelly, 2017. "The Dynamics of Informal Care Provision in an Australian Household Panel Survey: Previous Work Characteristics and Future Care Provision," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 93(302), pages 395-419, September.
    17. Stephen Drinkwater, 2015. "Informal Caring and Labour Market Outcomes Within England and Wales," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 273-286, February.
    18. Joan Costa-Font & Cristina Vilaplana-Prieto, 2023. "‘Investing’ in care for old age? An examination of long-term care expenditure dynamics and its spillovers," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 1-30, January.
    19. Mazzotta, Fernanda & Bettio, Francesca & Zigante, Valentina, 2018. "And Thou Shalt Honor: children’s caregiving, work and religion," GLO Discussion Paper Series 202, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    20. Nguyen, Ha Trong & Connelly, Luke Brian, 2014. "The effect of unpaid caregiving intensity on labour force participation: Results from a multinomial endogenous treatment model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 115-122.
    21. Belloni, Michele & Carrino, Ludovico & Meschi, Elena, 2022. "The impact of working conditions on mental health: Novel evidence from the UK," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2015_num_481_1_10635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.