IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecoprv/ecop_0249-4744_1993_num_109_3_5616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L'apport du Q de Tobin à la modélisation de l'investissement en France

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Epaulard

Abstract

[fre] L'apport du Q de Tobin à la modélisation de l'investissement en France, . par Anne Epaulard.. . Cet article revient sur la pertinence du modèle en Q de Tobin pour la modélisation du comportement d'investissement des entreprises françaises. Des tests d'hypothèses non emboîtées permettent de mesurer l'apport du Q de Tobin en comparant les performances de ce modèle à celles de l'accélérateur, du profit et de la profitabilité. Nous exploitons ensuite deux visions alternatives permettant de justifier, au niveau maao-économique, la présence simultanée de l'accélérateur et du Q de Tobin dans les équations d'investissement. La première consiste à supposer qu'une partie des entreprises est contrainte dans ses débouchés. Nous estimons alors un modèle à deux régimes (accélérateur - Q de Tobin) dont les performances empiriques sont satisfaisantes et soulignent que les deux régimes se sont succédé et ont parfois coexisté sur la période 1974-1989. La seconce vision consiste à introduire l'hypothèse de concurrence monopolistique dans le modèle théorique et les estimations économétriques. [spa] La aportación del Q de Tobin para la modelización de las inversiones en Francia, . por Anne Epaulard.. . Este artículo vuelve a tratar de la pertinencia del modelo en Q de Tobin para la modelización del comportamiento de la inversión de las empresas francesas. Diversos tests de hipótesis no encajadas permiten medir la aportación del Q de Tobin por comparación de los resultados de este modelo con aquellos del acelerador, del beneficio y de la beneficiabilidad. Acto seguido, se aplican dos visiones altemativas que permiten justificar, a nivel maaoeconómico, la presencia simultánea del acelerador y del Q de Tobin en las ecuaciones de inversión. La primera consiste en suponer que una parte de las empresas se ve apremiada en sus salidas. Se estima en este caso un modelo de dos regínenes (acelerador - Q de Tobin) cuyos resultados empíricos son satisfactorios y vienen a subrayar que los dos regímenes se han sucedido y que, en ciertos casos, han coexistido durante el periodo 1974-1989. La segunda visión consiste en introducir la hipótesis de la competencia monopolística en el modelo teórico y las estimaciones econométricas. [ger] Der Beitrag des Tobin-q zur Modellierung der Investitionstätigkeit in Frankreich, . von Anne Epaulard.. . Dieser Artikel behandelt erneut die Relevanz des Tobin-q-Modelles für die Modellierung des Investitionsverhaltens der französischen Unternehmen. Anhand von Tests mit voneinander unabhängigen Hypothesen kann der Beitrag des Tobin-q durch den Vagleich der leistungsfähigkeit dieses Modells mit der des Akzelerators, des Gewinns und der Rentabilität gemessen werden. Danach werden zwei alternative Betrachtungsweisen untersucht, mit denen sich auf gesamtwirtschaftlicher Ebene die gleichzeitige Anwesenheit des Akzelerators und des Tobin-q in den Investitionsgleichungen rechtfertigen läßt. Bei der asten Betrachtungsweise wird von der Vermutung ausgegangen, daß fur einen Teil der Unternehmen wegen da Absatzmärkte Zwänge bestehen. Deshalb wird ein Modell mit zwei Bestimmungsfaktoren geschätzt (Akzelerator - Tobin-q); dessen empirische Leistungsfahigkeit aweist sich als zufriedenstellend und verdeutlicht, daß die beiden Bestimmungsfaktoren nacheinander und wàhrend des Zeitraums von 1974 bis 1989 manchmal sogar parallel zur Anwendung kamen. Bei der zweiten Betrachtungsweise wird die Hypothèse der monopolistischen Konkurrenz in das theoretische Modell und in die ökonometrischen Schätzungen aufgenommen. [eng] The Contribution of Tobin's Q Theory to Investment Modelling in France, . by Anne Epaulard.. . This article looks at the aptness of Tobin's q theory in modelling the investment behaviour of French companies. Tests on independent hypotheses provide a measurement of the contribuuon of Tobin's q theory by comparing the performances of this model with those of the accelerator, profit and profitability. Two alternative concepts are then used to justify the simultaneous presence of the accelerator and Tobin's q in investment equations at a maaoeconomic level. The first concept assumes that some of the companies have restricted markets. A dual-system model is therefore estimated (accelaator - Tobin's q) with satisfactory empirical performances, which highlight the fact that the two systems followed one another and sometimes coexisted ova the period from 1974 to 1989. The second concept consists of introducing the hypothesis of monopolistic competition into the theoretical model and econometric estimates.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Epaulard, 1993. "L'apport du Q de Tobin à la modélisation de l'investissement en France," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 109(3), pages 1-12.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1993_num_109_3_5616
    DOI: 10.3406/ecop.1993.5616
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.1993.5616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecop.1993.5616
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0249-4744_1993_num_109_3_5616
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecop.1993.5616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. MacKinnon, James G. & White, Halbert & Davidson, Russell, 1983. "Tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses : Some further results," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 53-70, January.
    2. repec:adr:anecst:y:1992:i:27:p:04 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Tobin, James, 1969. "A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 1(1), pages 15-29, February.
    4. Omar Licandro, 1992. "Investment Dynamics and Capacity Utilization under Monopolistic Competition," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 27, pages 91-113.
    5. Hayashi, Fumio, 1982. "Tobin's Marginal q and Average q: A Neoclassical Interpretation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 213-224, January.
    6. James Chan-Lee & Raymond Torres, 1987. "q de Tobin et taux d'accumulation en France," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 5, pages 37-48.
    7. Schiantarelli, F. & Georgoutsos, D., 1990. "Monopolistic competition and the Q theory of investment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1061-1078, July.
    8. Robert E. Lucas & Jr., 1967. "Adjustment Costs and the Theory of Supply," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 75(4), pages 321-321.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicolas Piluso, 2024. "Tobin's Q and shareholder value: Does “shareholder return” impede investment?," Post-Print hal-04699405, HAL.
    2. Ngongang, Elie, 2012. "Econometric Analysis of the Impact of Financial Variables on Investment Behavior in Sub-Saharan African (SSA) Countries," Review of Applied Economics, Lincoln University, Department of Financial and Business Systems, vol. 8(1), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Mickaël Clévenot & Jacques Mazier, 2005. "Investment and rate of profit in a financial context: The French case," Working Papers hal-00188616, HAL.
    4. Mickaël Clévenot & Yann Guy & Jacques Mazier, 2009. "Equity and debt in a financialised economy: the French case," CEPN Working Papers hal-00435685, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-Bernard Chatelain, 2002. "Structural modelling of investment and financial constraints: Where do we stand?," Working Paper Research 28, National Bank of Belgium.
    2. Tryphon Kollintzas, 1986. "Tax Policy under Nongeometric Physical Depreciation," Public Finance Review, , vol. 14(3), pages 263-288, July.
    3. Shaukat, Badiea & Zhu, Qigui & Khan, M. Ijaz, 2019. "Real interest rate and economic growth: A statistical exploration for transitory economies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    4. Alan Carruth & Andy Dickerson & Andrew Henley, 2000. "What do We Know About Investment Under Uncertainty?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 119-154, April.
    5. Francisco A. Gallego & Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel & Luis Servén, 2004. "General Equilibrium Dynamics of External Shocks and Policy Changes in Chile," Working Papers Central Bank of Chile 271, Central Bank of Chile.
    6. Jean-Bernard Chatelain, 2003. "Structural modelling of financial constraints on investment: where do we stand?," Chapters, in: Paul Butzen & Catherine Fuss (ed.), Firms’ Investment and Finance Decisions, chapter 2, pages 40-58, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Abel, Andrew B & Eberly, Janice C, 1994. "A Unified Model of Investment under Uncertainty," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(5), pages 1369-1384, December.
    8. Ogawa, Kazuo & Suzuki, Kazuyuki, 2008. "Information, investment, and the stock market: A study of investment revision data of Japanese manufacturing industries," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 663-676, December.
    9. Lecca, Patrizio & McGregor, Peter G. & Swales, J. Kim, 2013. "Forward-looking and myopic regional Computable General Equilibrium models: How significant is the distinction?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 160-176.
    10. Omar Licandro, 1992. "Investissement, incertitude de la demande et contraintes de capacités David de la Croix," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 106(5), pages 85-95.
    11. Warwick J McKibbin & Peter J Wilcoxen, 1997. "Macroeconomic Volatility In General Equilibrium," Departmental Working Papers 1998-07, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics, revised Jun 1998.
    12. Oksanen, Olli-Pekka, 2006. "Are Foreign Investments Replacing Domestic Investments? - Evidence from Finnish Manufacturing," Discussion Papers 1001, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    13. Jianjun Miao & Pengfei Wang, 2014. "A Q-theory model with lumpy investment," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 57(1), pages 133-159, September.
    14. Zivanemoyo Chinzara & Radhika Lahiri & En Te Chen, 2017. "Financial liberalization and sectoral reallocation of capital in South Africa," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 309-356, February.
    15. Murakami, Hiroki, 2015. "Wage flexibility and economic stability in a non-Walrasian model of economic growth," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 25-41.
    16. Frank Silvio Marzano & Enrico Saltari, 1999. "Modern Theories of Investment Decisions A Critical Assessment," Working Papers 57, Sapienza University of Rome, CIDEI.
    17. Lee, Gabriel S., 1999. "Housing Investment Dynamics, Period of Production, and Adjustment Costs," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, March.
    18. Georgy Idrisov, 2010. "Factors of Demand for Imported Goods for Investment Purpose to Russia," Research Paper Series, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 138P.
    19. Andrew B. Abel & Janice C. Eberly, "undated". "An Exact Solution for the Investment and Market Value of a Firm Facing Uncertainty, Adjustment Costs, and Irreversibility," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 12-93, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
    20. Ngongang, Elie, 2012. "Econometric Analysis of the Impact of Financial Variables on Investment Behavior in Sub-Saharan African (SSA) Countries," Review of Applied Economics, Lincoln University, Department of Financial and Business Systems, vol. 8(1), pages 1-22, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1993_num_109_3_5616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.