IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlaip/v2017y2017i2id109p188-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Emergence and Historical Development of Informatics and Computing Disciplines in Selected European Countries and the USA
[Ustavení a historický vývoj informatiky a počítačových disciplín ve vybraných evropských zemích a v USA]

Author

Listed:
  • Zdeněk Smutný
  • Michal Doležel

Abstract

This article presents an overview that compares the historical tendencies in defining informatics as a new discipline, subject area or field of study focused on the design and application of computer technology. Apart from computer construction, the focus is on two major areas: computational processes and information processes. The article first considers the development in the United States of America (USA), which differed substantially from Europe. In the USA the development concerned disciplines referred to as computer science, computer engineering and (library and) information science. The article then discusses the situation in France and Germany. Consequently, the development in the USA and Western Europe is contrasted with the development in the Soviet Union, particularly with the crucial role of cybernetics in this region. The time range considered in the article is limited to the 1960s and 1970s. The article introduces the individual regional concepts of informatics and discusses the social, economic and political background of the emergence and development of these concepts. This view makes it possible to present an original approach to the ambiguous interpretation of "What is informatics as a scientific discipline in an international context", while respecting the distinctions given by the outset and historical development in different countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Zdeněk Smutný & Michal Doležel, 2017. "The Emergence and Historical Development of Informatics and Computing Disciplines in Selected European Countries and the USA [Ustavení a historický vývoj informatiky a počítačových disciplín ve vyb," Acta Informatica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(2), pages 188-229.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlaip:v:2017:y:2017:i:2:id:109:p:188-229
    DOI: 10.18267/j.aip.109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://aip.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.aip.109.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://aip.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.aip.109.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.aip.109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Strauss, George, 1991. "Present at the Beginning: Some Personal Notes on OB's Early Days and Later," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt3474t8nc, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    2. David Ellis & David Allen & Tom Wilson, 1999. "Information science and information systems: Conjunct subjects disjunct disciplines," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 50(12), pages 1095-1107.
    3. M C Jackson, 2009. "Fifty years of systems thinking for management," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 24-32, May.
    4. Wallace J. Hopp, 2004. "Fifty Years of Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 1-7, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Preece, Gary & Shaw, Duncan & Hayashi, Haruo, 2013. "Using the Viable System Model (VSM) to structure information processing complexity in disaster response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 209-218.
    2. Richard J. Ormerod, 2016. "Critical Rationalism for Practice and its Relationship to Critical Systems Thinking," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 4-23, January.
    3. Luoma, Jukka, 2016. "Model-based organizational decision making: A behavioral lens," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 816-826.
    4. Matthew Hutcheson & Alec Morton & Shona Blair, 2024. "Exploring Perspectives on Agroecological Transition in Scotland with Critical Systems Heuristics," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 459-482, August.
    5. Vijaya Sunder M & Anupama Prashar, 2023. "State and citizen responsiveness in fighting a pandemic crisis: A systems thinking perspective," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 170-193, January.
    6. Ya Li & Zhichang Zhu & Catherine M. Gerard, 2012. "Learning from Conflict Resolution: An Opportunity to Systems Thinking," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 209-220, March.
    7. Holsapple, Clyde W. & Lee-Post, Anita, 2010. "Behavior-based analysis of knowledge dissemination channels in operations management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 167-178, June.
    8. David C. Lane, 2016. "‘Till the Muddle in my Mind Have Cleared Awa’: Can We Help Shape Policy Using Systems Modelling?," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 633-650, September.
    9. Xiaodong Zhu & Lingfei Yu, 2019. "The Impact of Warranty Efficiency of Remanufactured Products on Production Decisions and Green Growth Performance in Closed-Loop Supply Chain: Perspective of Consumer Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, March.
    10. Merigó, José M. & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2017. "A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 37-48.
    11. Matthew Pepper & Andrew Sense & Kate Speare, 2016. "Systems Pluralism in Infrastructure Decision-Making for Socially Connected Greenfield Communities," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 129-148, April.
    12. Dorys Y. Rodríguez-Castro & Juan Aparicio, 2021. "Introducing a functional framework for integrating the empirical evidence about higher education institutions’ functions and capabilities: A literature review," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 17(1), pages 231-267.
    13. John W. Boudreau, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: Organizational Behavior, Strategy, Performance, and Design in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1463-1476, November.
    14. Iryna Nyenno & Vyacheslav Truba & Liudmyla Tokarchuk, 2023. "Managerial Future of the Artificial Intelligence," Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 6(2), pages 72-88, June.
    15. Middleton, Michael, 2007. "A framework for information management: Using case studies to test application," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 9-21.
    16. Naor, Michael & Jones, Janine Sanders & Bernardes, Ednilson S. & Goldstein, Susan Meyer & Schroeder, Roger, 2014. "The culture-effectiveness link in a manufacturing context: A resource-based perspective," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 321-331.
    17. Duong Thuy Pham & Ayham A. M. Jaaron, 2018. "Design for Mass Customisation in Higher Education: a Systems-Thinking Approach," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 293-310, June.
    18. J Luoma & R P Hämäläinen & E Saarinen, 2011. "Acting with systems intelligence: integrating complex responsive processes with the systems perspective," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(1), pages 3-11, January.
    19. R J Ormerod, 2011. "The relationship between operational research and systems thinking," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(1), pages 242-245, January.
    20. Fleischhacker, Adam J. & Zhao, Yao, 2011. "Planning for demand failure: A dynamic lot size model for clinical trial supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 496-506, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlaip:v:2017:y:2017:i:2:id:109:p:188-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.