IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0245983.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing the effect of cross-group friendship on generalized trust to its effect on prejudice: The mediating role of threat perceptions and negative affect

Author

Listed:
  • Wahideh Achbari
  • Benny Geys
  • Bertjan Doosje

Abstract

Intergroup relations theory posits that cross-group friendship reduces threat perceptions and negative emotions about outgroups. This has been argued to mitigate the negative effects of ethnic diversity on generalized trust. Yet, direct tests of this friendship-trust relation, especially including perceptions of threat and negative affect as mediators, have remained rare at the individual level. In this article, we bridge this research gap using representative data from eight European countries (Group-Focused Enmity). We employ structural equation modelling (SEM) to model mediated paths of cross-group friendship on generalized trust via perceptions of threat and negative affect. We find that both the total effect as well as the (mediated) total indirect effect of cross-group friendship on generalized trust are weak when compared with similar paths estimated for prejudice.

Suggested Citation

  • Wahideh Achbari & Benny Geys & Bertjan Doosje, 2021. "Comparing the effect of cross-group friendship on generalized trust to its effect on prejudice: The mediating role of threat perceptions and negative affect," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0245983
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245983
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245983&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0245983?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah McKenna & Eunro Lee & Kathleen A Klik & Andrew Markus & Miles Hewstone & Katherine J Reynolds, 2018. "Are diverse societies less cohesive? Testing contact and mediated contact theories," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Tufan Ekici & Deniz Yucel, 2015. "What Determines Religious and Racial Prejudice in Europe? The Effects of Religiosity and Trust," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 105-133, May.
    3. Dietlind Stolle & Allison Harell, 2013. "Social Capital and Ethno-racial Diversity: Learning to Trust in an Immigrant Society," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 61(1), pages 42-66, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Jiyin & Galinsky, Adam D., 2020. "The Diversity-Uncertainty-Valence (DUV) model of generalized trust development," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 49-64.
    2. Carney, JoLynn V. & Liu, Yanhong & Hazler, Richard J., 2018. "A path analysis on school bullying and critical school environment variables: A social capital perspective," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 231-239.
    3. Cary Wu, 2021. "How Stable is Generalized Trust? Internal Migration and the Stability of Trust Among Canadians," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 129-147, January.
    4. Nicolette D. Manglos-Weber, 2017. "Religious Transformations and Generalized Trust in Sub-Saharan Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 579-599, September.
    5. Ping Zhang & Xin Wei & Guirong Mao, 2024. "Cultural diversity, social integration, and migrant entrepreneurship—evidence from the China migrants dynamic survey," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 1135-1155, March.
    6. Birte Gundelach & Markus Freitag, 2014. "Neighbourhood Diversity and Social Trust: An Empirical Analysis of Interethnic Contact and Group-specific Effects," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(6), pages 1236-1256, May.
    7. Sarah McKenna & Eunro Lee & Kathleen A Klik & Andrew Markus & Miles Hewstone & Katherine J Reynolds, 2018. "Are diverse societies less cohesive? Testing contact and mediated contact theories," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Choi, Soobin & Lee, Moosung, 2021. "Diversity as an opportunity or a challenge? A cross-national study of ethnic diversity and students’ generalized trust," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    9. Jens Peter Frølund Thomsen & Jannik Fenger & Nathalie Rüger Jepsen, 2021. "The Experiential Basis of Social Trust Towards Ethnic Outgroup Members," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 191-209, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0245983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.