IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0238322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crossing complexity of space-filling curves reveals entanglement of S-phase DNA

Author

Listed:
  • Nick Kinney
  • Molly Hickman
  • Ramu Anandakrishnan
  • Harold R Garner

Abstract

Space-filling curves have been used for decades to study the folding principles of globular proteins, compact polymers, and chromatin. Formally, space-filling curves trace a single circuit through a set of points (x,y,z); informally, they correspond to a polymer melt. Although not quite a melt, the folding principles of Human chromatin are likened to the Hilbert curve: a type of space-filling curve. Hilbert-like curves in general make biologically compelling models of chromatin; in particular, they lack knots which facilitates chromatin folding, unfolding, and easy access to genes. Knot complexity has been intensely studied with the aid of Alexander polynomials; however, the approach does not generalize well to cases of more than one chromosome. Crossing complexity is an understudied alternative better suited for quantifying entanglement between chromosomes. Do Hilbert-like configurations limit crossing complexity between chromosomes? How does crossing complexity for Hilbert-like configurations compare to equilibrium configurations? To address these questions, we extend the Mansfield algorithm to enable sampling of Hilbert-like space filling curves on a simple cubic lattice. We use the extended algorithm to generate equilibrium, intermediate, and Hilbert-like configurational ensembles and compute crossing complexity between curves (chromosomes) in each configurational snapshot. Our main results are twofold: (a) Hilbert-like configurations limit entanglement between chromosomes and (b) Hilbert-like configurations do not limit entanglement in a model of S-phase DNA. Our second result is particularly surprising yet easily rationalized with a geometric argument. We explore ergodicity of the extended algorithm and discuss our results in the context of more sophisticated models of chromatin.

Suggested Citation

  • Nick Kinney & Molly Hickman & Ramu Anandakrishnan & Harold R Garner, 2020. "Crossing complexity of space-filling curves reveals entanglement of S-phase DNA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0238322
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0238322
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0238322&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0238322?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William R. Taylor, 2000. "A deeply knotted protein structure and how it might fold," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6798), pages 916-919, August.
    2. Smrek, Jan & Grosberg, Alexander Y., 2013. "A novel family of space-filling curves in their relation to chromosome conformation in eukaryotes," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(24), pages 6375-6388.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tatjana Škrbić & Cristian Micheletti & Pietro Faccioli, 2012. "The Role of Non-Native Interactions in the Folding of Knotted Proteins," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Ye Lei & Zhaoyong Li & Guangcheng Wu & Lijie Zhang & Lu Tong & Tianyi Tong & Qiong Chen & Lingxiang Wang & Chenqi Ge & Yuxi Wei & Yuanjiang Pan & Andrew C.-H. Sue & Linjun Wang & Feihe Huang & Hao Li, 2022. "A trefoil knot self-templated through imination in water," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-7, December.
    3. Lindsey A. Doyle & Brittany Takushi & Ryan D. Kibler & Lukas F. Milles & Carolina T. Orozco & Jonathan D. Jones & Sophie E. Jackson & Barry L. Stoddard & Philip Bradley, 2023. "De novo design of knotted tandem repeat proteins," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Rhonald C Lua & Alexander Y Grosberg, 2006. "Statistics of Knots, Geometry of Conformations, and Evolution of Proteins," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(5), pages 1-8, May.
    5. Miguel A Soler & Patrícia F N Faísca, 2013. "Effects of Knots on Protein Folding Properties," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-10, September.
    6. Zhiwen Li & Jingjing Zhang & Gao Li & Richard J. Puddephatt, 2024. "Self-assembly of the smallest and tightest molecular trefoil knot," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-6, December.
    7. Miguel A Soler & Patrícia F N Faísca, 2012. "How Difficult Is It to Fold a Knotted Protein? In Silico Insights from Surface-Tethered Folding Experiments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Michael C Prentiss & David J Wales & Peter G Wolynes, 2010. "The Energy Landscape, Folding Pathways and the Kinetics of a Knotted Protein," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-12, July.
    9. Alexander Begun & Sergei Liubimov & Alexander Molochkov & Antti J Niemi, 2021. "On topology and knotty entanglement in protein folding," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0238322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.