IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0074755.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Knots on Protein Folding Properties

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel A Soler
  • Patrícia F N Faísca

Abstract

This work explores the impact of knots, knot depth and motif of the threading terminus in protein folding properties (kinetics, thermodynamics and mechanism) via extensive Monte Carlo simulations of lattice models. A knotted backbone has no effect on protein thermodynamic stability but it may affect key aspects of folding kinetics. In this regard, we found clear evidence for a functional advantage of knots: knots enhance kinetic stability because a knotted protein unfolds at a distinctively slower rate than its unknotted counterpart. However, an increase in knot deepness does not necessarily lead to more effective changes in folding properties. In this regard, a terminus with a non-trivial conformation (e.g. hairpin) can have a more dramatic effect in enhancing kinetic stability than knot depth. Nevertheless, our results suggest that the probability of the denatured ensemble to keep knotted is higher for proteins with deeper knots, indicating that knot depth plays a role in determining the topology of the denatured state. Refolding simulations starting from denatured knotted conformations show that not every knot is able to nucleate folding and further indicate that the formation of the knotting loop is a key event in the folding of knotted trefoils. They also show that there are specific native contacts within the knotted core that are crucial to keep a native knotting loop in denatured conformations which otherwise have no detectable structure. The study of the knotting mechanism reveals that the threading of the knotting loop generally occurs towards late folding in conformations that exhibit a significant degree of structural consolidation.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel A Soler & Patrícia F N Faísca, 2013. "Effects of Knots on Protein Folding Properties," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-10, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0074755
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0074755
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0074755&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0074755?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miguel A Soler & Patrícia F N Faísca, 2012. "How Difficult Is It to Fold a Knotted Protein? In Silico Insights from Surface-Tethered Folding Experiments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-13, December.
    2. William R. Taylor, 2000. "A deeply knotted protein structure and how it might fold," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6798), pages 916-919, August.
    3. Tatjana Škrbić & Cristian Micheletti & Pietro Faccioli, 2012. "The Role of Non-Native Interactions in the Folding of Knotted Proteins," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-12, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miguel A Soler & Patrícia F N Faísca, 2012. "How Difficult Is It to Fold a Knotted Protein? In Silico Insights from Surface-Tethered Folding Experiments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Tatjana Škrbić & Cristian Micheletti & Pietro Faccioli, 2012. "The Role of Non-Native Interactions in the Folding of Knotted Proteins," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Nick Kinney & Molly Hickman & Ramu Anandakrishnan & Harold R Garner, 2020. "Crossing complexity of space-filling curves reveals entanglement of S-phase DNA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Ye Lei & Zhaoyong Li & Guangcheng Wu & Lijie Zhang & Lu Tong & Tianyi Tong & Qiong Chen & Lingxiang Wang & Chenqi Ge & Yuxi Wei & Yuanjiang Pan & Andrew C.-H. Sue & Linjun Wang & Feihe Huang & Hao Li, 2022. "A trefoil knot self-templated through imination in water," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-7, December.
    5. Lindsey A. Doyle & Brittany Takushi & Ryan D. Kibler & Lukas F. Milles & Carolina T. Orozco & Jonathan D. Jones & Sophie E. Jackson & Barry L. Stoddard & Philip Bradley, 2023. "De novo design of knotted tandem repeat proteins," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Silvio a Beccara & Tatjana Škrbić & Roberto Covino & Cristian Micheletti & Pietro Faccioli, 2013. "Folding Pathways of a Knotted Protein with a Realistic Atomistic Force Field," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-9, March.
    7. Rhonald C Lua & Alexander Y Grosberg, 2006. "Statistics of Knots, Geometry of Conformations, and Evolution of Proteins," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(5), pages 1-8, May.
    8. Zhiwen Li & Jingjing Zhang & Gao Li & Richard J. Puddephatt, 2024. "Self-assembly of the smallest and tightest molecular trefoil knot," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-6, December.
    9. Michael C Prentiss & David J Wales & Peter G Wolynes, 2010. "The Energy Landscape, Folding Pathways and the Kinetics of a Knotted Protein," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-12, July.
    10. Alexander Begun & Sergei Liubimov & Alexander Molochkov & Antti J Niemi, 2021. "On topology and knotty entanglement in protein folding," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0074755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.