IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0234080.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of biophysical properties of α1β2 and α3β2 GABAA receptors in whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiological recordings

Author

Listed:
  • Emma Rie Olander
  • Dieter Janzen
  • Carmen Villmann
  • Anders A Jensen

Abstract

In the present study we have characterized the biophysical properties of wild-type (WT) α1β2 and α3β2 GABAA receptors and probed the molecular basis for the observed differences. The activation and desensitization behavior and the residual currents of the receptors expressed in HEK293 cells were determined in whole-cell patch clamp recordings. Kinetic parameters of α1β2 and α3β2 activation differed significantly, with α1β2 and α3β2 exhibiting rise times (10–90%) of 24 ± 2 ms and 51 ± 7 ms, respectively. In contrast, the two receptors exhibited largely comparable desensitization behavior with decay currents that could be fitted to exponential functions with two or three components. Most notably, the two receptor compositions displayed different degrees of desentization, with the residual currents of α1β2 and α3β2 constituting 34 ± 2% and 21 ± 2% of the peak current, respectively. The respective contributions of the extracellular domains and the transmembrane/intracellular domains of the α-subunit to these physiological profiles were next assessed in recordings from cells expressing αβ2 receptors comprising chimeric α-subunits. The rise times displayed by α1ECD/α3TMDβ2 and α3ECD/α1TMDβ2 receptors were intermediate to those of WT α1β2 and WT α3β2, and the distribution of the different components of the current decays exhibited by the two chimeric receptors followed the same pattern as the two WT receptors. The residual current exhibited by α1ECD/α3TMDβ2 (23 ± 3%) was similar to that of α3β2 but significantly different from that of α1β2, whereas the residual current displayed by α3ECD/α1TMDβ2 (27 ± 2%) was intermediate to and did not differ significantly from either of the WT receptors. This points to molecular differences in the transmembrane/intracellular domains of the α-subunit as the main determinants of the observed differences in receptor physiology between α1β2 and α3β2 receptors.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma Rie Olander & Dieter Janzen & Carmen Villmann & Anders A Jensen, 2020. "Comparison of biophysical properties of α1β2 and α3β2 GABAA receptors in whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiological recordings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0234080
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0234080
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0234080&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0234080?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc Gielen & Philip Thomas & Trevor G. Smart, 2015. "The desensitization gate of inhibitory Cys-loop receptors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-10, November.
    2. Paul S. Miller & A. Radu Aricescu, 2014. "Crystal structure of a human GABAA receptor," Nature, Nature, vol. 512(7514), pages 270-275, August.
    3. Shaotong Zhu & Colleen M. Noviello & Jinfeng Teng & Richard M. Walsh & Jeong Joo Kim & Ryan E. Hibbs, 2018. "Structure of a human synaptic GABAA receptor," Nature, Nature, vol. 559(7712), pages 67-72, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arvind Kumar & Kayla Kindig & Shanlin Rao & Afroditi-Maria Zaki & Sandip Basak & Mark S. P. Sansom & Philip C. Biggin & Sudha Chakrapani, 2022. "Structural basis for cannabinoid-induced potentiation of alpha1-glycine receptors in lipid nanodiscs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Weronika Chojnacka & Jinfeng Teng & Jeong Joo Kim & Anders A. Jensen & Ryan E. Hibbs, 2024. "Structural insights into GABAA receptor potentiation by Quaalude," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Nikhil Bharambe & Zhuowen Li & David Seiferth & Asha Manikkoth Balakrishna & Philip C. Biggin & Sandip Basak, 2024. "Cryo-EM structures of prokaryotic ligand-gated ion channel GLIC provide insights into gating in a lipid environment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Xiaofen Liu & Weiwei Wang, 2023. "Asymmetric gating of a human hetero-pentameric glycine receptor," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Shaotong Zhu & Akshay Sridhar & Jinfeng Teng & Rebecca J. Howard & Erik Lindahl & Ryan E. Hibbs, 2022. "Structural and dynamic mechanisms of GABAA receptor modulators with opposing activities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Dagimhiwat H. Legesse & Chen Fan & Jinfeng Teng & Yuxuan Zhuang & Rebecca J. Howard & Colleen M. Noviello & Erik Lindahl & Ryan E. Hibbs, 2023. "Structural insights into opposing actions of neurosteroids on GABAA receptors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Eric Gibbs & Emily Klemm & David Seiferth & Arvind Kumar & Serban L. Ilca & Philip C. Biggin & Sudha Chakrapani, 2023. "Conformational transitions and allosteric modulation in a heteromeric glycine receptor," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Yingfeng Tao & Xiaoliu Zhou & Leqiang Sun & Da Lin & Huaiyuan Cai & Xi Chen & Wei Zhou & Bing Yang & Zhe Hu & Jing Yu & Jing Zhang & Xiaoqing Yang & Fang Yang & Bang Shen & Wenbao Qi & Zhenfang Fu & J, 2023. "Highly efficient and robust π-FISH rainbow for multiplexed in situ detection of diverse biomolecules," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Marie S. Prevost & Nathalie Barilone & Gabrielle Dejean de la Bâtie & Stéphanie Pons & Gabriel Ayme & Patrick England & Marc Gielen & François Bontems & Gérard Pehau-Arnaudet & Uwe Maskos & Pierre , 2023. "An original potentiating mechanism revealed by the cryo-EM structures of the human α7 nicotinic receptor in complex with nanobodies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0234080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.