IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0232030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric evaluation of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ) using item analysis according to the Rasch model

Author

Listed:
  • Luz Dary Upegui-Arango
  • Thomas Forkmann
  • Tine Nielsen
  • Nina Hallensleben
  • Heide Glaesmer
  • Lena Spangenberg
  • Tobias Teismann
  • Georg Juckel
  • Maren Boecker

Abstract

The Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ) assesses Thwarted Belongingness (TB) and Perceived Burdensomeness (PB), two predictors of suicidal thoughts. Up to now, the use of item response theory (IRT) for the evaluation of the INQ has been restricted to a single study with clinically depressed and suicidal youth. Therefore, the psychometric properties of the two INQ-15-subscales TB and PB were now evaluated in a general population sample (N = 2508) and a clinical adult population sample (N = 185) using IRT, specifically the Rasch model (RM) and the graphical log-linear Rasch model (GLLRM). Of special interest was whether the INQ-subscales displayed differential item functioning (DIF) across the two different samples and how well the subscales were targeted to the two sample populations. For the clinical sample, fit to a GLLRM could be established for the PB-subscale and fit to a RM was established for a five-item version of the TB-subscale. In contrast, for the general population sample fit to a GLLRM could only be achieved for the PB-subscale. Overall, there was strong evidence of local dependence (LD) across items and of some age- and gender-related DIF. Both subscales exhibited massive DIF related to the sample, indicating that they don’t work the same across the general population and clinical sample. As expected, targeting of both INQ-subscales was much better for the clinical population. Further investigations of the INQ-15 under the Rasch approach in a large clinical population are recommended to determine and optimize the scale performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Luz Dary Upegui-Arango & Thomas Forkmann & Tine Nielsen & Nina Hallensleben & Heide Glaesmer & Lena Spangenberg & Tobias Teismann & Georg Juckel & Maren Boecker, 2020. "Psychometric evaluation of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ) using item analysis according to the Rasch model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0232030
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0232030
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0232030&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0232030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erling Andersen, 1977. "Sufficient statistics and latent trait models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(1), pages 69-81, March.
    2. Erling Andersen, 1973. "A goodness of fit test for the rasch model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(1), pages 123-140, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clemens Draxler, 2010. "Sample Size Determination for Rasch Model Tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 708-724, December.
    2. Erling Andersen, 1995. "Residualanalysis in the polytomous rasch model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 60(3), pages 375-393, September.
    3. Timo Bechger & Gunter Maris, 2015. "A Statistical Test for Differential Item Pair Functioning," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(2), pages 317-340, June.
    4. Clemens Draxler & Rainer Alexandrowicz, 2015. "Sample Size Determination Within the Scope of Conditional Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Special Focus on Testing the Rasch Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 897-919, December.
    5. Roberto Burro & Riccardo Sartori & Giulio Vidotto, 2011. "The method of constant stimuli with three rating categories and the use of Rasch models," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 43-58, January.
    6. Lionel WILNER, 2019. "The Dynamics of Individual Happiness," Working Papers 2019-18, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    7. David J. Hessen, 2023. "Fitting and Testing Log-Linear Subpopulation Models with Known Support," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(3), pages 917-939, September.
    8. C. Glas & Anna Dagohoy, 2007. "A Person Fit Test For Irt Models For Polytomous Items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(2), pages 159-180, June.
    9. Clemens Draxler, 2018. "Bayesian conditional inference for Rasch models," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 102(2), pages 245-262, April.
    10. Gerhard Tutz & Gunther Schauberger, 2015. "A Penalty Approach to Differential Item Functioning in Rasch Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 21-43, March.
    11. Herault, Nicolas & Ribar, David C., 2017. "Food insecurity and homelessness in the Journeys Home survey," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 52-66.
    12. David Andrich, 2010. "Sufficiency and Conditional Estimation of Person Parameters in the Polytomous Rasch Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(2), pages 292-308, June.
    13. Georg Gittler & Gerhard Fischer, 2011. "IRT-Based Measurement of Short-Term Changes of Ability, With an Application to Assessing the “Mozart Effectâ€," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 36(1), pages 33-75, February.
    14. Robert Zwitser & Gunter Maris, 2015. "Conditional Statistical Inference with Multistage Testing Designs," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 65-84, March.
    15. Svend Kreiner & Karl Christensen, 2014. "Analyses of Model Fit and Robustness. A New Look at the PISA Scaling Model Underlying Ranking of Countries According to Reading Literacy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 210-231, April.
    16. Betina Ristorp Andersen & Maria Birkvad Rasmussen & Karl Bang Christensen & Kirsten G Engel & Charlotte Ringsted & Ellen Løkkegaard & Martin G Tolsgaard, 2020. "Making the best of the worst: Care quality during emergency cesarean sections," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, February.
    17. Clio Kenterelidou & Fani Galatsopoulou & Antonis Skamnakis, 2017. "Agrotourism and well-being sustainability: A communication and journalistic approach to ?what matters and better life?," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 129-147.
    18. Debora Chiusole & Luca Stefanutti & Pasquale Anselmi & Egidio Robusto, 2013. "Assessing Parameter Invariance in the BLIM: Bipartition Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 710-724, October.
    19. Ivo Molenaar, 1983. "Some improved diagnostics for failure of the Rasch model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 48(1), pages 49-72, March.
    20. Enrico Gori & Ting Fa Margherita Chang & Luca Iseppi & Beniamino Cenci Goga & Maria Francesca Iulietto & Paola Sechi & Maria Antonietta Lepellere, 2017. "The assessment of consumer sensitivity to animal welfare: An application of Rasch Model," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 107-127.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0232030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.