IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0231794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Putting Within-Country Political Differences in (Global) Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ximena Garcia-Rada
  • Michael I Norton

Abstract

The current political discourse in the United States focuses on extreme political polarization as a contributor to ills ranging from government shutdowns to awkward family holidays. And indeed, a large body of research has documented differences between liberals and conservatives–primarily focused on Republicans and Democrats in the United States. We combine large international surveys and more fine-grained surveys of United States citizens to compare differences in opinion between Republicans and Democrats to the full range of world opinion on moral issues (N = 37,653 in 39 countries) and issues of free speech (N = 40,786 in 38 countries). When viewed in the full distribution, polarization between Democrats and Republicans appears relatively small, even on divisive issues such as abortion, sexual preference, and freedom of religious speech. The average Democrat-Republic overlap is greater than 70% of the country pair overlaps across eight moral issues, meaning that 70% of the country pairs are more dissimilar from each other than Democrats and Republicans are dissimilar; similarly, the average Democrat-Republic overlap is greater than 79% of the country pair overlaps across five freedom of speech issues. These results suggest that cross-cultural comparisons are useful for putting differences between political partisans within the same country in context.

Suggested Citation

  • Ximena Garcia-Rada & Michael I Norton, 2020. "Putting Within-Country Political Differences in (Global) Perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231794
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231794
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231794&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0231794?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Sakoda, 1981. "A generalized index of dissimilarity," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 18(2), pages 245-250, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sandro Sousa & Vincenzo Nicosia, 2022. "Quantifying ethnic segregation in cities through random walks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Michel Beine & Marco Delogu & Lionel Ragot, 2020. "The role of fees in foreign education: evidence from Italy [Determinants of international student migration]," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 571-600.
    3. Michel Beine & Marco Delogu & Lionel Ragot, 2017. "The Role of Fees in Foreign Education: Evidence From Italy and the United Kingdom," Working Papers 2017-04, CEPII research center.
    4. Coral Río & Olga Alonso-Villar, 2022. "On Measuring Segregation in a Multigroup Context: Standardized Versus Unstandardized Indices," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 633-659, September.
    5. P. A. Jargowsky, "undated". "Take the money and run: Economic segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas," Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Papers 1056-95, University of Wisconsin Institute for Research on Poverty.
    6. Frankel, David M. & Volij, Oscar, 2011. "Measuring school segregation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 1-38, January.
    7. Oscar Volij & David Frankel, 2004. "Measuring Segregation," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 210, Econometric Society.
    8. John H. Fleming & Neli Esipova & Anita Pugliese & Julie Ray & Rajesh Srinivasan, 2018. "DATA-SURVEY: Migrant Acceptance Index: A Global Examination of the Relationship Between Interpersonal Contact and Attitudes toward Migrants," Border Crossing, Transnational Press London, UK, vol. 8(1), pages 103-132, January-J.
    9. Franklin J. James, 1986. "A New Generalized “Exposure-Based†Segregation Index," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 14(3), pages 301-316, February.
    10. Tracy M. Gordon, 2004. "Moving Up by Moving Out? Planned Developments and Residential Segregation in California," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(2), pages 441-461, February.
    11. Bharathi, Naveen & Malghan, Deepak & Mishra, Sumit & Rahman, Andaleeb, 2021. "Fractal urbanism: City size and residential segregation in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    12. Wong, David W.S. & Das Gupta, Debasree, 2023. "Empirical evidence supporting the inclusion of multi-axes segregation in assessing US county health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    13. Vincent P. Miller & John M. Quigley, 1990. "Segregation by Racial and Demographic Group: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 27(1), pages 3-21, February.
    14. Dawid Kudas & Agnieszka Wnęk & Lucia Tátošová, 2022. "Land Use Mix in Functional Urban Areas of Selected Central European Countries from 2006 to 2012," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Lionel Ragot & Michel Beine & Marco Delogu, 2017. "Understanding the Impact of Tuition Fees in Foreign Education: the Case of the UK," EconomiX Working Papers 2017-45, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    16. Mulekar, Madhuri S. & Knutson, John C. & Champanerkar, Jyoti A., 2008. "How useful are approximations to mean and variance of the index of dissimilarity?," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 2098-2109, January.
    17. Joana Barros & Flavia F Feitosa, 2018. "Uneven geographies: Exploring the sensitivity of spatial indices of residential segregation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(6), pages 1073-1089, November.
    18. Stanley Lieberson & Donna Carter, 1982. "A Model for Inferring the Voluntary and involuntary causes of residential segregation," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 19(4), pages 511-526, November.
    19. Magdalena Górczyńska, 2017. "Gentrifiers in the post-socialist city? A critical reflection on the dynamics of middle- and upper-class professional groups in Warsaw," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(5), pages 1099-1121, May.
    20. Michael J. White & Ann H. Kim & Jennifer E. Glick, 2005. "Mapping Social Distance," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 34(2), pages 173-203, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.