IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0230549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic evaluation of stormwater capture and its multiple benefits in California

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah E Diringer
  • Morgan Shimabuku
  • Heather Cooley

Abstract

Urban stormwater is increasingly being considered a viable alternative water supply in California and throughout the southwestern U.S. However, current economic analyses of stormwater capture do not adequately examine differences in stormwater project types and do not evaluate co-benefits provided by the projects. As a result, urban stormwater capture is undervalued as a water supply option. To advance economic analyses of stormwater capture, we determined the levelized cost of water in U.S. dollar per acre-foot of water supply (AF; 1 AF = 1233.5 m3) for 50 proposed stormwater capture projects in California, characterizing the projects by water source, process, and water supply yield. In addition, we incorporated reported co-benefits of projects into the analysis to determine the net benefit of proposed projects. Proposed urban stormwater capture projects were more expensive than non-urban stormwater capture projects on a per-volume basis ($1,180 per AF and $531 per AF, respectively); however, this was primarily driven by the relatively large size of the non-urban stormwater capture projects examined. When incorporating the limited number of reported co-benefits of the projects, the expected levelized cost of water from urban stormwater capture projects decreased dramatically. For projects that reported even a limited number of additional benefits, the net levelized cost decreased from $1,030 per AF to $150 per AF, with some of the projects demonstrating a net benefit. Thus, scaling urban stormwater capture projects to capitalize on economies of scale and incorporating co-benefits of projects can dramatically improve the economic feasibility of these projects. This work demonstrates that stormwater capture can present a cost-effective water supply option in California, and that beyond California, fairer comparisons among projects and inclusion of co-benefits can provide decision makers with adequate information to maximize investments in water management.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah E Diringer & Morgan Shimabuku & Heather Cooley, 2020. "Economic evaluation of stormwater capture and its multiple benefits in California," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0230549
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230549
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230549&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0230549?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel L. Swain & Baird Langenbrunner & J. David Neelin & Alex Hall, 2018. "Increasing precipitation volatility in twenty-first-century California," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(5), pages 427-433, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco Costa & Fabien Forge & Jason Garred & João Paulo Pessoa, 2023. "The Impact of Climate Change on Risk and Return in Indian Agriculture," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 85(1), pages 1-27, May.
    2. Cooley, Savannah & Jenkins, Amber & Schaeffer, Blake & Bormann, Kat J. & Abdallah, Adel & Melton, Forrest & Granger, Stephanie & Graczyk, Indrani, 2022. "Paths to research-driven decision making in the realms of environment and water," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    3. Francisco Costa & Fabien Forge & Jason Garred & João Paulo Pessoa, 2020. "Climate Change and the Distribution of Agricultural Output," Working Papers 2003E, University of Ottawa, Department of Economics.
    4. Xuezhi Tan & Xinxin Wu & Zeqin Huang & Jianyu Fu & Xuejin Tan & Simin Deng & Yaxin Liu & Thian Yew Gan & Bingjun Liu, 2023. "Increasing global precipitation whiplash due to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Kamiar Mohaddes & Ryan N C Ng & M Hashem Pesaran & Mehdi Raissi & Jui-Chung Yang, 2023. "Climate change and economic activity: evidence from US states," Oxford Open Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 2, pages 28-46.
    6. Mohammad Ahsan Uddin & ASM Maksud Kamal & Shamsuddin Shahid & Eun-Sung Chung, 2020. "Volatility in Rainfall and Predictability of Droughts in Northwest Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Vinícius B. P. Chagas & Pedro L. B. Chaffe & Günter Blöschl, 2022. "Climate and land management accelerate the Brazilian water cycle," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Cai, Qingyin & Çakır, Metin & Beatty, Timothy & Park, Timothy A., 2022. "Drought and the Specialty Crops Production in California," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322530, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. François Salanié & Vera Zaporozhets, 2022. "Water allocation, crop choice, and priority services," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 24(1), pages 140-158, February.
    10. Bruno, Ellen M. & Jessoe, Katrina, 2021. "Missing markets: Evidence on agricultural groundwater demand from volumetric pricing," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    11. Fernandez-Bou, Angel Santiago & Rodriguez-Flores, Jose M. & Ortiz-Partida, J. Pablo & Fencl, Amanda & Classen-Rodriguez, Leticia & Yang, Vivian & Williams, Emily & Schull, Val Zayden & Dobbin, Kristin, 2024. "Cropland repurposing as a tool for water sustainability and a just socioenvironmental transition in California: Review and Best Practices," OSF Preprints bvfsm, Center for Open Science.
    12. Mingyu Park & Nathaniel C. Johnson & Thomas L. Delworth, 2024. "The driving of North American climate extremes by North Pacific stationary-transient wave interference," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Thorne, James H. & Boynton, Ryan M. & Hollander, Allan D. & Whitney, Jason P. & Shapiro, Kristen D., 2021. "2020 Critical Update to Caltrans Wildfire Vulnerability Analysis," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4723h7j8, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    14. José C. Fernández-Alvarez & Albenis Pérez-Alarcón & Jorge Eiras-Barca & Stefan Rahimi & Raquel Nieto & Luis Gimeno, 2023. "Projected changes in atmospheric moisture transport contributions associated with climate warming in the North Atlantic," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Tamara S. Wilson & Nathan D. Van Schmidt & Ruth Langridge, 2020. "Land-Use Change and Future Water Demand in California’s Central Coast," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, September.
    16. Soliman, Adam, 2022. "Prescriptive drought policy and water supplier compliance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    17. Sandi Matsumoto & Melissa M. Rohde & Sarah Heard, 2019. "Policy Note: "Economic Tools to Achieve Groundwater Sustainability for Nature: Two Experimental Case Studies from California"," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(04), pages 1-15, October.
    18. Lepsch, Hannah C. & Brown, Patrick H. & Peterson, Caitlin A. & Gaudin, Amélie C.M. & Khalsa, Sat Darshan S., 2019. "Impact of organic matter amendments on soil and tree water status in a California orchard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 204-212.
    19. Julia Homann & Jessica L. Oster & Cameron B. Wet & Sebastian F. M. Breitenbach & Thorsten Hoffmann, 2022. "Linked fire activity and climate whiplash in California during the early Holocene," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    20. Uma S. Bhatt & Benjamin A. Carreras & José Miguel Reynolds Barredo & David E. Newman & Pere Collet & Damiá Gomila, 2022. "The Potential Impact of Climate Change on the Efficiency and Reliability of Solar, Hydro, and Wind Energy Sources," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0230549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.