IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0225256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Mastery Rubric for Bioinformatics: A tool to support design and evaluation of career-spanning education and training

Author

Listed:
  • Rochelle E Tractenberg
  • Jessica M Lindvall
  • Teresa K Attwood
  • Allegra Via

Abstract

As the life sciences have become more data intensive, the pressure to incorporate the requisite training into life-science education and training programs has increased. To facilitate curriculum development, various sets of (bio)informatics competencies have been articulated; however, these have proved difficult to implement in practice. Addressing this issue, we have created a curriculum-design and -evaluation tool to support the development of specific Knowledge, Skills and Abilities (KSAs) that reflect the scientific method and promote both bioinformatics practice and the achievement of competencies. Twelve KSAs were extracted via formal analysis, and stages along a developmental trajectory, from uninitiated student to independent practitioner, were identified. Demonstration of each KSA by a performer at each stage was initially described (Performance Level Descriptors, PLDs), evaluated, and revised at an international workshop. This work was subsequently extended and further refined to yield the Mastery Rubric for Bioinformatics (MR-Bi). The MR-Bi was validated by demonstrating alignment between the KSAs and competencies, and its consistency with principles of adult learning. The MR-Bi tool provides a formal framework to support curriculum building, training, and self-directed learning. It prioritizes the development of independence and scientific reasoning, and is structured to allow individuals (regardless of career stage, disciplinary background, or skill level) to locate themselves within the framework. The KSAs and their PLDs promote scientific problem formulation and problem solving, lending the MR-Bi durability and flexibility. With its explicit developmental trajectory, the tool can be used by developing or practicing scientists to direct their (and their team’s) acquisition of new, or to deepen existing, bioinformatics KSAs. The MR-Bi is a tool that can contribute to the cultivation of a next generation of bioinformaticians who are able to design reproducible and rigorous research, and to critically analyze results from their own, and others’, work.

Suggested Citation

  • Rochelle E Tractenberg & Jessica M Lindvall & Teresa K Attwood & Allegra Via, 2019. "The Mastery Rubric for Bioinformatics: A tool to support design and evaluation of career-spanning education and training," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-29, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0225256
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0225256
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0225256&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0225256?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marlie MacLean & Colin Miles, 1999. "Swift action needed to close the skills gap in bioinformatics," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6748), pages 10-10, September.
    2. Lonnie Welch & Fran Lewitter & Russell Schwartz & Cath Brooksbank & Predrag Radivojac & Bruno Gaeta & Maria Victoria Schneider, 2014. "Bioinformatics Curriculum Guidelines: Toward a Definition of Core Competencies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-10, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melissa A Wilson Sayres & Charles Hauser & Michael Sierk & Srebrenka Robic & Anne G Rosenwald & Todd M Smith & Eric W Triplett & Jason J Williams & Elizabeth Dinsdale & William R Morgan & James M Burn, 2018. "Bioinformatics core competencies for undergraduate life sciences education," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Lonnie Welch & Cath Brooksbank & Russell Schwartz & Sarah L Morgan & Bruno Gaeta & Alastair M Kilpatrick & Daniel Mietchen & Benjamin L Moore & Nicola Mulder & Mark Pauley & William Pearson & Predrag , 2016. "Applying, Evaluating and Refining Bioinformatics Core Competencies (An Update from the Curriculum Task Force of ISCB’s Education Committee)," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-4, May.
    3. Berk Ekmekci & Charles E McAnany & Cameron Mura, 2016. "An Introduction to Programming for Bioscientists: A Python-Based Primer," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-43, June.
    4. Rochelle E Tractenberg & Melody R Wilkinson & Amy W Bull & Tiffany P Pellathy & Joan B Riley, 2019. "A developmental trajectory supporting the evaluation and achievement of competencies: Articulating the Mastery Rubric for the nurse practitioner (MR-NP) program curriculum," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Rebecca F Alford & Andrew Leaver-Fay & Lynda Gonzales & Erin L Dolan & Jeffrey J Gray, 2017. "A cyber-linked undergraduate research experience in computational biomolecular structure prediction and design," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0225256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.