IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0196878.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bioinformatics core competencies for undergraduate life sciences education

Author

Listed:
  • Melissa A Wilson Sayres
  • Charles Hauser
  • Michael Sierk
  • Srebrenka Robic
  • Anne G Rosenwald
  • Todd M Smith
  • Eric W Triplett
  • Jason J Williams
  • Elizabeth Dinsdale
  • William R Morgan
  • James M Burnette III
  • Samuel S Donovan
  • Jennifer C Drew
  • Sarah C R Elgin
  • Edison R Fowlks
  • Sebastian Galindo-Gonzalez
  • Anya L Goodman
  • Nealy F Grandgenett
  • Carlos C Goller
  • John R Jungck
  • Jeffrey D Newman
  • William Pearson
  • Elizabeth F Ryder
  • Rafael Tosado-Acevedo
  • William Tapprich
  • Tammy C Tobin
  • Arlín Toro-Martínez
  • Lonnie R Welch
  • Robin Wright
  • Lindsay Barone
  • David Ebenbach
  • Mindy McWilliams
  • Kimberly C Olney
  • Mark A Pauley

Abstract

Although bioinformatics is becoming increasingly central to research in the life sciences, bioinformatics skills and knowledge are not well integrated into undergraduate biology education. This curricular gap prevents biology students from harnessing the full potential of their education, limiting their career opportunities and slowing research innovation. To advance the integration of bioinformatics into life sciences education, a framework of core bioinformatics competencies is needed. To that end, we here report the results of a survey of biology faculty in the United States about teaching bioinformatics to undergraduate life scientists. Responses were received from 1,260 faculty representing institutions in all fifty states with a combined capacity to educate hundreds of thousands of students every year. Results indicate strong, widespread agreement that bioinformatics knowledge and skills are critical for undergraduate life scientists as well as considerable agreement about which skills are necessary. Perceptions of the importance of some skills varied with the respondent’s degree of training, time since degree earned, and/or the Carnegie Classification of the respondent’s institution. To assess which skills are currently being taught, we analyzed syllabi of courses with bioinformatics content submitted by survey respondents. Finally, we used the survey results, the analysis of the syllabi, and our collective research and teaching expertise to develop a set of bioinformatics core competencies for undergraduate biology students. These core competencies are intended to serve as a guide for institutions as they work to integrate bioinformatics into their life sciences curricula.

Suggested Citation

  • Melissa A Wilson Sayres & Charles Hauser & Michael Sierk & Srebrenka Robic & Anne G Rosenwald & Todd M Smith & Eric W Triplett & Jason J Williams & Elizabeth Dinsdale & William R Morgan & James M Burn, 2018. "Bioinformatics core competencies for undergraduate life sciences education," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0196878
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0196878
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0196878&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0196878?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lonnie Welch & Fran Lewitter & Russell Schwartz & Cath Brooksbank & Predrag Radivojac & Bruno Gaeta & Maria Victoria Schneider, 2014. "Bioinformatics Curriculum Guidelines: Toward a Definition of Core Competencies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-10, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lonnie Welch & Cath Brooksbank & Russell Schwartz & Sarah L Morgan & Bruno Gaeta & Alastair M Kilpatrick & Daniel Mietchen & Benjamin L Moore & Nicola Mulder & Mark Pauley & William Pearson & Predrag , 2016. "Applying, Evaluating and Refining Bioinformatics Core Competencies (An Update from the Curriculum Task Force of ISCB’s Education Committee)," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-4, May.
    2. Rochelle E Tractenberg & Jessica M Lindvall & Teresa K Attwood & Allegra Via, 2019. "The Mastery Rubric for Bioinformatics: A tool to support design and evaluation of career-spanning education and training," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-29, November.
    3. Berk Ekmekci & Charles E McAnany & Cameron Mura, 2016. "An Introduction to Programming for Bioscientists: A Python-Based Primer," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-43, June.
    4. Rochelle E Tractenberg & Melody R Wilkinson & Amy W Bull & Tiffany P Pellathy & Joan B Riley, 2019. "A developmental trajectory supporting the evaluation and achievement of competencies: Articulating the Mastery Rubric for the nurse practitioner (MR-NP) program curriculum," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Rebecca F Alford & Andrew Leaver-Fay & Lynda Gonzales & Erin L Dolan & Jeffrey J Gray, 2017. "A cyber-linked undergraduate research experience in computational biomolecular structure prediction and design," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0196878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.