IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0224593.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A developmental trajectory supporting the evaluation and achievement of competencies: Articulating the Mastery Rubric for the nurse practitioner (MR-NP) program curriculum

Author

Listed:
  • Rochelle E Tractenberg
  • Melody R Wilkinson
  • Amy W Bull
  • Tiffany P Pellathy
  • Joan B Riley

Abstract

Background: Advanced practice registered nursing (APRN) competencies exist, but there is no structure supporting the operationalization of the competencies by APRN educators. The development of a Mastery Rubric (MR) for APRNs provides a developmental trajectory that supports educational institutions, educators, students, and APRNs. A MR describes the explicit knowledge, skills, and abilities as performed by the individual moving from novice (student) through graduation and into the APRN career. Method: A curriculum development tool, the Mastery Rubric (MR), was created to structure the curriculum and career of the nurse practitioner (NP), the MR-NP. Cognitive task analysis (CTA) yielded the first of the three required elements for any MR: a list of knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) to be established through the curriculum. The European guild structure and Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive behaviors provided the second element of the MR, the specific developmental stages that are relevant for the curriculum. The Body of Work method of standard setting was used to create the third required element of the MR, performance level descriptors (PLDs) for each KSA at each of these stages. Although the CTA was informed by the competencies, it was still necessary to formally assess the alignment of competencies with the resulting KSAs; this was achieved via Degrees of Freedom Analysis (DoFA). Validity evidence was obtained from this Analysis and from the DoFA of the KSAs’ alignment with principles of andragogy, and with learning outcomes assessment criteria. These analyses are the first time the national competencies for the NP have been evaluated in this manner. Results: CTA of the 43 NP Competencies led to seven KSAs that support a developmental trajectory for instruction and documenting achievement towards independent performance on the competencies. The Competencies were objectively evaluable for the first time since their publication due to the psychometric validity attributes of the PLD-derived developmental trajectory. Three qualitatively distinct performance levels for the independent practitioner make the previously implicit developmental requirements of the competencies explicit for the first time. Discussion: The MR-NP provides the first articulated and observable developmental trajectory for the NP competencies, during and beyond the formal curriculum. A focus on psychometric validity was brought to bear on how learners would demonstrate their development, and ultimately their achievement, of the competencies. The MR-NP goes beyond the competencies with trajectories and PLDs that can engage both learner and instructor in this developmental process throughout the career.

Suggested Citation

  • Rochelle E Tractenberg & Melody R Wilkinson & Amy W Bull & Tiffany P Pellathy & Joan B Riley, 2019. "A developmental trajectory supporting the evaluation and achievement of competencies: Articulating the Mastery Rubric for the nurse practitioner (MR-NP) program curriculum," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0224593
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0224593
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0224593&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0224593?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lonnie Welch & Fran Lewitter & Russell Schwartz & Cath Brooksbank & Predrag Radivojac & Bruno Gaeta & Maria Victoria Schneider, 2014. "Bioinformatics Curriculum Guidelines: Toward a Definition of Core Competencies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-10, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melissa A Wilson Sayres & Charles Hauser & Michael Sierk & Srebrenka Robic & Anne G Rosenwald & Todd M Smith & Eric W Triplett & Jason J Williams & Elizabeth Dinsdale & William R Morgan & James M Burn, 2018. "Bioinformatics core competencies for undergraduate life sciences education," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Lonnie Welch & Cath Brooksbank & Russell Schwartz & Sarah L Morgan & Bruno Gaeta & Alastair M Kilpatrick & Daniel Mietchen & Benjamin L Moore & Nicola Mulder & Mark Pauley & William Pearson & Predrag , 2016. "Applying, Evaluating and Refining Bioinformatics Core Competencies (An Update from the Curriculum Task Force of ISCB’s Education Committee)," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-4, May.
    3. Rochelle E Tractenberg & Jessica M Lindvall & Teresa K Attwood & Allegra Via, 2019. "The Mastery Rubric for Bioinformatics: A tool to support design and evaluation of career-spanning education and training," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-29, November.
    4. Berk Ekmekci & Charles E McAnany & Cameron Mura, 2016. "An Introduction to Programming for Bioscientists: A Python-Based Primer," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-43, June.
    5. Rebecca F Alford & Andrew Leaver-Fay & Lynda Gonzales & Erin L Dolan & Jeffrey J Gray, 2017. "A cyber-linked undergraduate research experience in computational biomolecular structure prediction and design," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0224593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.