IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0218661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An inkblot for beliefs: The Truth Misattribution Procedure

Author

Listed:
  • Jamie Cummins
  • Jan De Houwer

Abstract

An increasing body of evidence shows the importance of accommodating relational information within implicit measures of psychological constructs. Whereas relational variants of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) have been proposed in the past, we put forward the Truth Misattribution Procedure (TMP) as a relational variant of the Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP) that aims to capture implicit beliefs. Across three experiments, we demonstrate that TMP effects are sensitive to the relational information contained within sentence primes, both in the context of causal stimulus relations of a known truth value (e.g., “smoking causes cancer” vs. “smoking prevents cancer”), as well as in the domain of gender stereotypes (e.g., “men are arrogant” vs. “men should be arrogant”). The potential benefits of the TMP are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jamie Cummins & Jan De Houwer, 2019. "An inkblot for beliefs: The Truth Misattribution Procedure," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218661
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218661
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218661&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0218661?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. N. Wilkinson & C. E. Rogers, 1973. "Symbolic Description of Factorial Models for Analysis of Variance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 22(3), pages 392-399, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Payne, Roger W., 1998. "Design keys, pseudo-factors and general balance," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 217-229, December.
    2. Bent Nielsen, 2014. "Deviance analysis of age-period-cohort models," Economics Papers 2014-W03, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    3. Quirin Gehmacher & Juliane Schubert & Fabian Schmidt & Thomas Hartmann & Patrick Reisinger & Sebastian Rösch & Konrad Schwarz & Tzvetan Popov & Maria Chait & Nathan Weisz, 2024. "Eye movements track prioritized auditory features in selective attention to natural speech," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Riehl, Kevin & Kiesel, Florian & Schiereck, Dirk, 2022. "Political and Socioeconomic Factors That Determine the Financial Outcome of Successful Green Innovation," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 132099, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    5. repec:jss:jstsof:23:i07 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Wei Pan & Xianbin Wang & Wenwei Zhou & Bowen Hang & Liwen Guo, 2023. "Linguistic Analysis for Identifying Depression and Subsequent Suicidal Ideation on Weibo: Machine Learning Approaches," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-12, February.
    7. Ferran Orga & Andrew Mitchell & Marc Freixes & Francesco Aletta & Rosa Ma Alsina-Pagès & Maria Foraster, 2021. "Multilevel Annoyance Modelling of Short Environmental Sound Recordings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, May.
    8. Christian Kleiber & Achim Zeileis, 2005. "Validating multiple structural change models-a case study," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(5), pages 685-690.
    9. repec:jss:jstsof:34:i01 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. repec:jss:jstsof:14:i09 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Zeileis, Achim & Kleiber, Christian & Kramer, Walter & Hornik, Kurt, 2003. "Testing and dating of structural changes in practice," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 44(1-2), pages 109-123, October.
    12. Emil Exenberger & Michaela Kav?áková, 2020. "Evaluation of financial health of companies through data envelopment analysis: Selection of variables for the DEA model in R," Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences 10913067, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    13. Großmann, Heiko, 2014. "Automating the analysis of variance of orthogonal designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-18.
    14. Emi Tanaka, 2020. "Simple outlier detection for a multi‐environmental field trial," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1374-1382, December.
    15. Kevser Cetin & Wolfram Mauser, 2023. "The Role of Recent Climate Change in Explaining the Statistical Yield Increase of Maize in Northern Bavaria—A Model Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    16. repec:jss:jstsof:17:i04 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Jesper Ryden & Sven Erick Alm, 2010. "The effect of interaction and rounding error in two-way ANOVA: example of impact on testing for normality," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(10), pages 1695-1701.
    18. Nitzan Shahar & Tobias U Hauser & Michael Moutoussis & Rani Moran & Mehdi Keramati & NSPN consortium & Raymond J Dolan, 2019. "Improving the reliability of model-based decision-making estimates in the two-stage decision task with reaction-times and drift-diffusion modeling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-25, February.
    19. Zardetto Diego, 2015. "ReGenesees: an Advanced R System for Calibration, Estimation and Sampling Error Assessment in Complex Sample Surveys," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 31(2), pages 177-203, June.
    20. Kevin Riehl & Florian Kiesel & Dirk Schiereck, 2022. "Political and Socioeconomic Factors That Determine the Financial Outcome of Successful Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.
    21. Cansino, José M. & Dugo, Víctor & Gálvez-Ruiz, David & Román-Collado, Rocío, 2023. "What drove electricity consumption in the residential sector during the SARS-CoV-2 confinement? A special focus on university students in southern Spain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    22. Artur Araujo & Steven Julious & Stephen Senn, 2016. "Understanding Variation in Sets of N-of-1 Trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-24, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.