IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v29y1998i2p217-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design keys, pseudo-factors and general balance

Author

Listed:
  • Payne, Roger W.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Payne, Roger W., 1998. "Design keys, pseudo-factors and general balance," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 217-229, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:29:y:1998:i:2:p:217-229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(98)00061-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. D. Patterson & R. A. Bailey, 1978. "Design Keys for Factorial Experiments," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 27(3), pages 335-343, November.
    2. G. N. Wilkinson & C. E. Rogers, 1973. "Symbolic Description of Factorial Models for Analysis of Variance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 22(3), pages 392-399, November.
    3. R. W. Payne & G. N. Wilkinson, 1977. "A General Algorithm for Analysis of Variance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 26(3), pages 251-260, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Großmann, Heiko, 2014. "Automating the analysis of variance of orthogonal designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-18.
    2. Bent Nielsen, 2014. "Deviance analysis of age-period-cohort models," Economics Papers 2014-W03, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    3. Quirin Gehmacher & Juliane Schubert & Fabian Schmidt & Thomas Hartmann & Patrick Reisinger & Sebastian Rösch & Konrad Schwarz & Tzvetan Popov & Maria Chait & Nathan Weisz, 2024. "Eye movements track prioritized auditory features in selective attention to natural speech," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. J. D. Godolphin, 2019. "Construction of row–column factorial designs," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 81(2), pages 335-360, April.
    5. Riehl, Kevin & Kiesel, Florian & Schiereck, Dirk, 2022. "Political and Socioeconomic Factors That Determine the Financial Outcome of Successful Green Innovation," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 132099, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    6. repec:jss:jstsof:23:i07 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Wei Pan & Xianbin Wang & Wenwei Zhou & Bowen Hang & Liwen Guo, 2023. "Linguistic Analysis for Identifying Depression and Subsequent Suicidal Ideation on Weibo: Machine Learning Approaches," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-12, February.
    8. Ferran Orga & Andrew Mitchell & Marc Freixes & Francesco Aletta & Rosa Ma Alsina-Pagès & Maria Foraster, 2021. "Multilevel Annoyance Modelling of Short Environmental Sound Recordings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, May.
    9. Payne, Roger W., 2003. "General balance, large data sets and extensions to unbalanced treatment structures," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 44(1-2), pages 297-304, October.
    10. Christian Kleiber & Achim Zeileis, 2005. "Validating multiple structural change models-a case study," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(5), pages 685-690.
    11. repec:jss:jstsof:34:i01 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. repec:jss:jstsof:14:i09 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Zeileis, Achim & Kleiber, Christian & Kramer, Walter & Hornik, Kurt, 2003. "Testing and dating of structural changes in practice," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 44(1-2), pages 109-123, October.
    14. Emil Exenberger & Michaela Kav?áková, 2020. "Evaluation of financial health of companies through data envelopment analysis: Selection of variables for the DEA model in R," Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences 10913067, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    15. L. Rob Verdooren, 2020. "History of the Statistical Design of Agricultural Experiments," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(4), pages 457-486, December.
    16. Emi Tanaka, 2020. "Simple outlier detection for a multi‐environmental field trial," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1374-1382, December.
    17. Rotem Botvinik-Nezer & Bogdan Petre & Marta Ceko & Martin A. Lindquist & Naomi P. Friedman & Tor D. Wager, 2024. "Placebo treatment affects brain systems related to affective and cognitive processes, but not nociceptive pain," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Kevser Cetin & Wolfram Mauser, 2023. "The Role of Recent Climate Change in Explaining the Statistical Yield Increase of Maize in Northern Bavaria—A Model Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    19. repec:jss:jstsof:17:i04 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Jesper Ryden & Sven Erick Alm, 2010. "The effect of interaction and rounding error in two-way ANOVA: example of impact on testing for normality," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(10), pages 1695-1701.
    21. Nitzan Shahar & Tobias U Hauser & Michael Moutoussis & Rani Moran & Mehdi Keramati & NSPN consortium & Raymond J Dolan, 2019. "Improving the reliability of model-based decision-making estimates in the two-stage decision task with reaction-times and drift-diffusion modeling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-25, February.
    22. Zardetto Diego, 2015. "ReGenesees: an Advanced R System for Calibration, Estimation and Sampling Error Assessment in Complex Sample Surveys," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 31(2), pages 177-203, June.
    23. Jamie Cummins & Jan De Houwer, 2019. "An inkblot for beliefs: The Truth Misattribution Procedure," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, June.
    24. Kobilinsky, André & Monod, Hervé & Bailey, R.A., 2017. "Automatic generation of generalised regular factorial designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 311-329.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:29:y:1998:i:2:p:217-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.