IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0216038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative effectiveness analysis of Medicare dialysis facility survey processes

Author

Listed:
  • Sehee Kim
  • Fan Wu
  • Claudia Dahlerus
  • Deanna Chyn
  • Yi Li
  • Joseph M Messana

Abstract

Background: To assure and improve the quality and safety of care provided by dialysis facilities, federal oversight has been conducted through periodic survey assessment. However, with the growing number of individuals living with ESRD and dialysis facilities, state survey agencies have faced challenges in time and resources to complete survey activities. Therefore, the survey process (‘Basic Survey’ used prior to 2013) was redesigned in order to develop a more efficient process (‘Core Survey’ newly implemented since 2013). The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate and compare dialysis facility survey outcomes between the Core and Basic Survey processes, using a causal inference technique. The survey outcomes included condition-level citations, total citations (condition- and standard-level), and citation rate per survey-hour. Methods: For comparisons of non-randomly assigned survey types, propensity score matching was used. Data were drawn from CMS’ Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) database from January 1, 2013 through July 31, 2014. Covariates available included survey type, facility characteristics (state, urban, practices catheter reuse, dialysis modalities offered, number of patients, mortality, hospitalization, infection) and survey-related characteristics (number of surveyors, time since last survey). Results: Compared to the Basic Survey, the Core Survey identified 10% more total citations (P = 0.001) and identified condition-level citations more frequently, although the latter finding did not reach statistical significance. These findings suggest an increase of 10% in citation rate (i.e. ratio between citations and survey time) with the Core survey process (P = 0.002). Conclusions: Greater efficiency has implications for attenuating the time-intensive burden of the state survey process, and improving the safety and quality of care provided by dialysis facilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Sehee Kim & Fan Wu & Claudia Dahlerus & Deanna Chyn & Yi Li & Joseph M Messana, 2019. "Comparative effectiveness analysis of Medicare dialysis facility survey processes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-11, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0216038
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0216038
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0216038&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0216038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel B. Hall, 2000. "Zero-Inflated Poisson and Binomial Regression with Random Effects: A Case Study," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(4), pages 1030-1039, December.
    2. Stacia M. DeSantis & Christos Lazaridis & Shuang Ji & Francis G. Spinale, 2014. "Analyzing propensity matched zero-inflated count outcomes in observational studies," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 127-141, January.
    3. Hongsoo Kim & Christine Kovner & Charlene Harrington & William Greene & Mathy Mezey, 2009. "A Panel Data Analysis of the Relationships of Nursing Home Staffing Levels and Standards to Regulatory Deficiencies," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 64(2), pages 269-278.
    4. Charlene Harrington & David Zimmerman & Sarita L. Karon & James Robinson & Patricia Beutel, 2000. "Nursing Home Staffing and Its Relationship to Deficiencies," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 55(5), pages 278-287.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John R. Bowblis & Stephen Crystal & Orna Intrator & Judith A. Lucas, 2012. "Response To Regulatory Stringency: The Case Of Antipsychotic Medication Use In Nursing Homes," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(8), pages 977-993, August.
    2. Susan Feng Lu, 2012. "Multitasking, Information Disclosure, and Product Quality: Evidence from Nursing Homes," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 673-705, September.
    3. Luiz Paulo Fávero & Joseph F. Hair & Rafael de Freitas Souza & Matheus Albergaria & Talles V. Brugni, 2021. "Zero-Inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Models: A Better Way to Understand Data Relationships," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-28, May.
    4. Cho, Daegon & Hwang, Youngdeok & Park, Jongwon, 2018. "More buzz, more vibes: Impact of social media on concert distribution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 103-113.
    5. Greene, William, 2007. "Functional Form and Heterogeneity in Models for Count Data," Foundations and Trends(R) in Econometrics, now publishers, vol. 1(2), pages 113-218, August.
    6. Das, Ujjwal & Das, Kalyan, 2018. "Inference on zero inflated ordinal models with semiparametric link," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 104-115.
    7. Niklas Elert, 2014. "What determines entry? Evidence from Sweden," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 53(1), pages 55-92, August.
    8. Sarah Brown & Pulak Ghosh & Bhuvanesh Pareek & Karl Taylor, 2017. "Financial Hardship and Saving Behaviour: Bayesian Analysis of British Panel Data," Working Papers 2017011, The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics.
    9. David A Brown & Nelson Ma & Jin Sug Yang & Nicole Sutton & Gillian McAllister & Deborah Parker & Olivia Rawlings-Way & Rachael L Lewis, 2023. "The impact of business model workforce configurations on value creation and value appropriation in the Australian aged care sector," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(3), pages 495-523, August.
    10. Yanling Li & Zita Oravecz & Shuai Zhou & Yosef Bodovski & Ian J. Barnett & Guangqing Chi & Yuan Zhou & Naomi P. Friedman & Scott I. Vrieze & Sy-Miin Chow, 2022. "Bayesian Forecasting with a Regime-Switching Zero-Inflated Multilevel Poisson Regression Model: An Application to Adolescent Alcohol Use with Spatial Covariates," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(2), pages 376-402, June.
    11. Payandeh Najafabadi Amir T. & MohammadPour Saeed, 2018. "A k-Inflated Negative Binomial Mixture Regression Model: Application to Rate–Making Systems," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 1-31, July.
    12. Abbas Moghimbeigi & Mohammed Reza Eshraghian & Kazem Mohammad & Brian Mcardle, 2008. "Multilevel zero-inflated negative binomial regression modeling for over-dispersed count data with extra zeros," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(10), pages 1193-1202.
    13. Yanlin Tang & Liya Xiang & Zhongyi Zhu, 2014. "Risk Factor Selection in Rate Making: EM Adaptive LASSO for Zero‐Inflated Poisson Regression Models," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(6), pages 1112-1127, June.
    14. Harald Oberhofer & Michael Pfaffermayr, 2014. "Two-Part Models for Fractional Responses Defined as Ratios of Integers," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Zhang, Tonglin, 2019. "General Gaussian estimation," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 234-247.
    16. Damgaard, Christian, 2008. "Modelling pin-point plant cover data along an environmental gradient," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 404-410.
    17. Xie, Feng-Chang & Wei, Bo-Cheng & Lin, Jin-Guan, 2009. "Score tests for zero-inflated generalized Poisson mixed regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(9), pages 3478-3489, July.
    18. Soutik Ghosal & Timothy S. Lau & Jeremy Gaskins & Maiying Kong, 2020. "A hierarchical mixed effect hurdle model for spatiotemporal count data and its application to identifying factors impacting health professional shortages," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(5), pages 1121-1144, November.
    19. Liu, Juxin & Ma, Yanyuan & Johnstone, Jill, 2020. "A goodness-of-fit test for zero-inflated Poisson mixed effects models in tree abundance studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    20. Robert Richardson, 2022. "Spatial Generalized Linear Models with Non-Gaussian Translation Processes," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(1), pages 4-21, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0216038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.