IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0193328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying population-level health benefits and harms of e-cigarette use in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Samir S Soneji
  • Hai-Yen Sung
  • Brian A Primack
  • John P Pierce
  • James D Sargent

Abstract

Background: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) may help cigarette smokers quit smoking, yet they may also facilitate cigarette smoking for never-smokers. We quantify the balance of health benefits and harms associated with e-cigarette use at the population level. Methods and findings: Monte Carlo stochastic simulation model. Model parameters were drawn from census counts, national health and tobacco use surveys, and published literature. We calculate the expected years of life gained or lost from the impact of e-cigarette use on smoking cessation among current smokers and transition to long-term cigarette smoking among never smokers for the 2014 US population cohort. Results: The model estimated that 2,070 additional current cigarette smoking adults aged 25–69 (95% CI: -42,900 to 46,200) would quit smoking in 2015 and remain continually abstinent from smoking for ≥7 years through the use of e-cigarettes in 2014. The model also estimated 168,000 additional never-cigarette smoking adolescents aged 12–17 and young adults aged 18–29 (95% CI: 114,000 to 229,000), would initiate cigarette smoking in 2015 and eventually become daily cigarette smokers at age 35–39 through the use of e-cigarettes in 2014. Overall, the model estimated that e-cigarette use in 2014 would lead to 1,510,000 years of life lost (95% CI: 920,000 to 2,160,000), assuming an optimistic 95% relative harm reduction of e-cigarette use compared to cigarette smoking. As the relative harm reduction decreased, the model estimated a greater number of years of life lost. For example, the model estimated-1,550,000 years of life lost (95% CI: -2,200,000 to -980,000) assuming an approximately 75% relative harm reduction and -1,600,000 years of life lost (95% CI: -2,290,000 to -1,030,000) assuming an approximately 50% relative harm reduction. Conclusions: Based on the existing scientific evidence related to e-cigarettes and optimistic assumptions about the relative harm of e-cigarette use compared to cigarette smoking, e-cigarette use currently represents more population-level harm than benefit. Effective national, state, and local efforts are needed to reduce e-cigarette use among youth and young adults if e-cigarettes are to confer a net population-level benefit in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Samir S Soneji & Hai-Yen Sung & Brian A Primack & John P Pierce & James D Sargent, 2018. "Quantifying population-level health benefits and harms of e-cigarette use in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0193328
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0193328
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0193328&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0193328?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Al-Delaimy, W.K. & Myers, M.G. & Leas, E.C. & Strong, D.R. & Hofstetter, C.R., 2015. "E-cigarette use in the past and quitting behavior in the future: A population-based study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(6), pages 1213-1219.
    2. Sutfin, E.L. & Reboussin, B.A. & Debinski, B. & Wagoner, K.G. & Spangler, J. & Wolfson, M., 2015. "The impact of trying electronic cigarettes on cigarette smoking by college students: A prospective analysis," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(8), pages 83-89.
    3. IARC World Health Organization, 2009. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Smoke-free Policies," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt9q54k2c5, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    4. M. Brisson & W. J. Edmunds, 2006. "Impact of Model, Methodological, and Parameter Uncertainty in the Economic Analysis of Vaccination Programs," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 26(5), pages 434-446, September.
    5. Messer, K. & Trinidad, D.R. & Al-Delaimy, W.K. & Pierce, J.P., 2008. "Smoking cessation rates in the United States: A comparison of young adult and older smokers," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(2), pages 317-322.
    6. Andrew H. Briggs & Milton C. Weinstein & Elisabeth A. L. Fenwick & Jonathan Karnon & Mark J. Sculpher & A. David Paltiel, 2012. "Model Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Analysis," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 32(5), pages 722-732, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Page D. Dobbs & Jason B. Colditz & Shelby Shields & Anna Meadows & Brian A. Primack, 2022. "Policy and Behavior: Comparisons between Twitter Discussions about the US Tobacco 21 Law and Other Age-Related Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-10, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dimitris Bertsimas & John Silberholz & Thomas Trikalinos, 2018. "Optimal healthcare decision making under multiple mathematical models: application in prostate cancer screening," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 105-118, March.
    2. Ava A John-Baptiste & Wei Wu & Paula Rochon & Geoffrey M Anderson & Chaim M Bell, 2013. "A Systematic Review and Methodological Evaluation of Published Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Aromatase Inhibitors versus Tamoxifen in Early Stage Breast Cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-9, May.
    3. Ezbakhe, Fatine & Pérez-Foguet, Agustí, 2021. "Decision analysis for sustainable development: The case of renewable energy planning under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 601-613.
    4. Elisa Sicuri & Silke Fernandes & Eusebio Macete & Raquel González & Ghyslain Mombo-Ngoma & Achille Massougbodgi & Salim Abdulla & August Kuwawenaruwa & Abraham Katana & Meghna Desai & Michel Cot & Mic, 2015. "Economic Evaluation of an Alternative Drug to Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine as Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Mette Rasmussen & Berit Lilienthal Heitmann & Hanne Tønnesen, 2013. "Effectiveness of the Gold Standard Programmes (GSP) for Smoking Cessation in Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Jing Voon Chen & Julia L. Higle & Michael Hintlian, 2018. "A systematic approach for examining the impact of calibration uncertainty in disease modeling," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 541-561, October.
    7. Victor M. Cardenas & Victoria L. Evans & Appathurai Balamurugan & Mohammed F. Faramawi & Robert R. Delongchamp & J. Gary Wheeler, 2016. "Use of electronic nicotine delivery systems and recent initiation of smoking among US youth," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 61(2), pages 237-241, March.
    8. Naveed Chehrazi & Lauren E. Cipriano & Eva A. Enns, 2019. "Dynamics of Drug Resistance: Optimal Control of an Infectious Disease," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 619-650, May.
    9. Bogumił Kamiński & Michał Jakubczyk & Przemysław Szufel, 2018. "A framework for sensitivity analysis of decision trees," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(1), pages 135-159, March.
    10. Bertrand Dautzenberg & Stéphane Legleye & Michel Underner & Philippe Arvers & Bhavish Pothegadoo & Abdelhalim Bensaidi, 2023. "Systematic Review and Critical Analysis of Longitudinal Studies Assessing Effect of E-Cigarettes on Cigarette Initiation among Adolescent Never-Smokers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(20), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Alexander S. Lee & Joy L. Hart* & Kandi L. Walker & Rachel J. Keith & S. Lee Ridner, 2018. "Dual Users and Electronic Cigarette Only Users: Consumption and Characteristics," International Journal of Healthcare and Medical Sciences, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 4(6), pages 111-116, 06-2018.
    12. Mateusz Jankowski & Joshua Allan Lawson & Andrei Shpakou & Michał Poznański & Tadeusz Maria Zielonka & Ludmila Klimatckaia & Yelena Loginovich & Marta Rachel & Justína Gereová & Łukasz Minarowski & Ih, 2019. "Smoking Cessation and Vaping Cessation Attempts among Cigarette Smokers and E-Cigarette Users in Central and Eastern Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Jennifer A Gilbert & Sheela V Shenoi & Anthony P Moll & Gerald H Friedland & A David Paltiel & Alison P Galvani, 2016. "Cost-Effectiveness of Community-Based TB/HIV Screening and Linkage to Care in Rural South Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Anna K. Lugnér & Sido D. Mylius & Jacco Wallinga, 2010. "Dynamic versus static models in cost‐effectiveness analyses of anti‐viral drug therapy to mitigate an influenza pandemic," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(5), pages 518-531, May.
    15. Brown, Vicki & Diomedi, Belen Zapata & Moodie, Marj & Veerman, J. Lennert & Carter, Rob, 2016. "A systematic review of economic analyses of active transport interventions that include physical activity benefits," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 190-208.
    16. Johanna Leväsluoto & Johanna Kohl & Anton Sigfrids & Jussi Pihlajamäki & Janne Martikainen, 2021. "Digitalization as an Engine for Change? Building a Vision Pathway towards a Sustainable Health Care System by Using the MLP and Health Economic Decision Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-24, November.
    17. Wei-Hsin Huang & Hsin-Yin Hsu & Betty Chia-Chen Chang & Fong-Ching Chang, 2018. "Factors Correlated with Success Rate of Outpatient Smoking Cessation Services in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-7, June.
    18. Jonathan D. Campbell & R. Brett McQueen & Anne M. Libby & D. Eldon Spackman & Joshua J. Carlson & Andrew Briggs, 2015. "Cost-Effectiveness Uncertainty Analysis Methods," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 35(5), pages 596-607, July.
    19. Elahe Khorasani & Majid Davari & Abbas Kebriaeezadeh & Farshad Fatemi & Ali Akbari Sari & Vida Varahrami, 2022. "A comprehensive review of official discount rates in guidelines of health economic evaluations over time: the trends and roots," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(9), pages 1577-1590, December.
    20. Yeji Lee & Kang-Sook Lee & Haena Kim, 2019. "Predictors of Abstinence from Smoking: A Retrospective Study of Male College Students Enrolled in a Smoking Cessation Service," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-12, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0193328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.