IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v10y2013i8p3653-3666d28060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of the Gold Standard Programmes (GSP) for Smoking Cessation in Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women

Author

Listed:
  • Mette Rasmussen

    (WHO-CC Clinical Health Promotion Centre, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals—a part of Copenhagen University Hospital, The Capital Region, Nordre Fasanvej 57, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark)

  • Berit Lilienthal Heitmann

    (Institute of Preventive Medicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals—a part of Copenhagen University Hospital, The Capital Region, Nordre Fasanvej 57, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
    National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, DK-1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Hanne Tønnesen

    (WHO-CC Clinical Health Promotion Centre, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals—a part of Copenhagen University Hospital, The Capital Region, Nordre Fasanvej 57, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Clinical Health Promotion Centre, Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Entrance. 108, Malmö SE 205 02, Sweden
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Background : Smoking is considered the most important preventable risk factor in relation to the development of complications during pregnancy and delivery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an intensive 6-week gold standard programme (GSP) on pregnant women in real life. Methods : This was a prospective cohort study based on data from a national Danish registry on smoking cessation interventions. The study population included 10,682 women of a fertile age. The pregnancy status of the study population was identified using the National Patient Registry. Results : The response rate to follow up was 76%. The continuous abstinence rate for both pregnant and non-pregnant smokers was 24–32%. The following prognostic factors for continuous abstinence were identified: programme format (individual/group), older age, heavy smoking, compliance with the programme, health professional recommendation, and being a disadvantaged smoker. Conclusions : The GSP seems to be as effective among pregnant smokers as among non-pregnant smoking women. Due to the relatively high effect and clinical significance, the GSP would be an attractive element in smoking cessation intervention among pregnant women.

Suggested Citation

  • Mette Rasmussen & Berit Lilienthal Heitmann & Hanne Tønnesen, 2013. "Effectiveness of the Gold Standard Programmes (GSP) for Smoking Cessation in Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:10:y:2013:i:8:p:3653-3666:d:28060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/10/8/3653/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/10/8/3653/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Messer, K. & Trinidad, D.R. & Al-Delaimy, W.K. & Pierce, J.P., 2008. "Smoking cessation rates in the United States: A comparison of young adult and older smokers," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(2), pages 317-322.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mette Kehlet & Torben V. Schroeder & Hanne Tønnesen, 2015. "The Gold Standard Program for Smoking Cessation is Effective for Participants Over 60 Years of Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samir S Soneji & Hai-Yen Sung & Brian A Primack & John P Pierce & James D Sargent, 2018. "Quantifying population-level health benefits and harms of e-cigarette use in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Mateusz Jankowski & Joshua Allan Lawson & Andrei Shpakou & Michał Poznański & Tadeusz Maria Zielonka & Ludmila Klimatckaia & Yelena Loginovich & Marta Rachel & Justína Gereová & Łukasz Minarowski & Ih, 2019. "Smoking Cessation and Vaping Cessation Attempts among Cigarette Smokers and E-Cigarette Users in Central and Eastern Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Wei-Hsin Huang & Hsin-Yin Hsu & Betty Chia-Chen Chang & Fong-Ching Chang, 2018. "Factors Correlated with Success Rate of Outpatient Smoking Cessation Services in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-7, June.
    4. Yeji Lee & Kang-Sook Lee & Haena Kim, 2019. "Predictors of Abstinence from Smoking: A Retrospective Study of Male College Students Enrolled in a Smoking Cessation Service," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-12, September.
    5. Elaine M. Hernandez & Mike Vuolo & Laura C. Frizzell & Brian C. Kelly, 2019. "Moving Upstream: The Effect of Tobacco Clean Air Restrictions on Educational Inequalities in Smoking Among Young Adults," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(5), pages 1693-1721, October.
    6. Allison Lee & Angela A. Chang & Joanne Chen Lyu & Pamela M. Ling & Stephanie L. Hsia, 2022. "Characterizing Participant Perceptions about Smoking-Cessation Pharmacotherapy and E-Cigarettes from Facebook Smoking-Cessation Support Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-12, June.
    7. Rebecca Schnall & Jasmine Carcamo & Tiffany Porras & Ming-Chun Huang & Monica Webb Hooper, 2019. "Use of the Phase-Based Model of Smoking Treatment to Guide Intervention Development for Persons Living with HIV Who Self-Identify as African American Tobacco Smokers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-12, May.
    8. Brooke L. Bennett & Pallav Pokhrel, 2018. "Weight Concerns and Use of Cigarettes and E-Cigarettes among Young Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-10, May.
    9. G. Mzhavanadze & D. Yanin, 2023. "The Potential Impact of E-cigarettes on the Life-Years Lost from Conventional Smoking in the Russian Federation," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 253-274, June.
    10. Annemarie D. Jagielo & Amy Chieng & Cindy Tran & Amy Pirkl & Ann Cao-Nasalga & Ashley Bragg & Rachelle Mirkin & Judith J. Prochaska, 2024. "Predictors of Patient Engagement in Telehealth-Delivered Tobacco Cessation Treatment during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-12, January.
    11. Shu-Hong Zhu & Christopher M Anderson & Yue-Lin Zhuang & Anthony C Gamst & Neal D Kohatsu, 2017. "Smoking prevalence in Medicaid has been declining at a negligible rate," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:10:y:2013:i:8:p:3653-3666:d:28060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.