IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0175916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genomics of a revived breed: Case study of the Belgian campine cattle

Author

Listed:
  • Liesbeth François
  • Katrien Wijnrocx
  • Frédéric G Colinet
  • Nicolas Gengler
  • Bettine Hulsegge
  • Jack J Windig
  • Nadine Buys
  • Steven Janssens

Abstract

Through centuries of both natural and artificial selection, a variety of local cattle populations arose with highly specific phenotypes. However, the intensification and expansion of scale in animal production systems led to the predominance of a few highly productive cattle breeds. The loss of local populations is often considered irreversible and with them specific qualities and rare variants could be lost as well. Over these last years, the interest in these local breeds has increased again leading to increasing efforts to conserve these breeds or even revive lost populations, e.g. through the use of crosses with similar breeds. However, the remaining populations are expected to contain crossbred individuals resulting from introgressions. They are likely to carry exogenous genes that affect the breed’s authenticity on a genomic level. Using the revived Campine breed as a case study, 289 individuals registered as purebreds were genotyped on the Illumina BovineSNP50. In addition, genomic information on the Illumina BovineHD and Illumina BovineSNP50 of ten breeds was available to assess the current population structure, genetic diversity, and introgression with phenotypically similar and/or historically related breeds. Introgression with Holstein and beef cattle genotypes was limited to only a few farms. While the current population shows a substantial amount of within-breed variation, the majority of genotypes can be separated from other breeds in the study, supporting the re-establishment of the Campine breed. The majority of the population is genetically close to the Deep Red (NL), Improved Red (NL) and Eastern Belgium Red and White (BE) cattle, breeds known for their historical ties to the Campine breed. This would support an open herdbook policy, thereby increasing the population size and consequently providing a more secure future for the breed.

Suggested Citation

  • Liesbeth François & Katrien Wijnrocx & Frédéric G Colinet & Nicolas Gengler & Bettine Hulsegge & Jack J Windig & Nadine Buys & Steven Janssens, 2017. "Genomics of a revived breed: Case study of the Belgian campine cattle," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0175916
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0175916
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0175916&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0175916?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dray, Stéphane & Dufour, Anne-Béatrice, 2007. "The ade4 Package: Implementing the Duality Diagram for Ecologists," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 22(i04).
    2. Mathieu Gautier & Denis Laloë & Katayoun Moazami-Goudarzi, 2010. "Insights into the Genetic History of French Cattle from Dense SNP Data on 47 Worldwide Breeds," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-11, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenzel Kröber & Martin Böhnke & Erik Welk & Christian Wirth & Helge Bruelheide, 2012. "Leaf Trait-Environment Relationships in a Subtropical Broadleaved Forest in South-East China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-11, April.
    2. Pengfei Song & Wen Qin & YanGan Huang & Lei Wang & Zhenyuan Cai & Tongzuo Zhang, 2020. "Grazing Management Influences Gut Microbial Diversity of Livestock in the Same Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-12, May.
    3. la Grange, Anthony & le Roux, Niël & Gardner-Lubbe, Sugnet, 2009. "BiplotGUI: Interactive Biplots in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 30(i12).
    4. Jonas Eberle & Renier Myburgh & Dirk Ahrens, 2014. "The Evolution of Morphospace in Phytophagous Scarab Chafers: No Competition - No Divergence?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Hammond, Jim & Rosenblum, Nathaniel & Breseman, Dana & Gorman, Léo & Manners, Rhys & van Wijk, Mark T. & Sibomana, Milindi & Remans, Roseline & Vanlauwe, Bernard & Schut, Marc, 2020. "Towards actionable farm typologies: Scaling adoption of agricultural inputs in Rwanda," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    6. Calenge, Clément, 2007. "Exploring Habitat Selection by Wildlife with adehabitat," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 22(i06).
    7. Sara Rachik & Urania Christaki & Luen Luen Li & Savvas Genitsaris & Elsa Breton & Sébastien Monchy, 2018. "Diversity and potential activity patterns of planktonic eukaryotic microbes in a mesoeutrophic coastal area (eastern English Channel)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, May.
    8. Serra W. Buchanan & Megan Baskerville & Maren Oelbermann & Andrew M. Gordon & Naresh V. Thevathasan & Marney E. Isaac, 2020. "Plant Diversity and Agroecosystem Function in Riparian Agroforests: Providing Ecosystem Services and Land-Use Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Catharine Prussing & Kevin J Emerson & Sara A Bickersmith & Maria Anice Mureb Sallum & Jan E Conn, 2019. "Minimal genetic differentiation of the malaria vector Nyssorhynchus darlingi associated with forest cover level in Amazonian Brazil," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Anna Favati & Josefina Zidar & Hanne Thorpe & Per Jensen & Hanne Løvlie, 2016. "The ontogeny of personality traits in the red junglefowl, Gallus gallus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(2), pages 484-493.
    11. repec:jss:jstsof:22:i01 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Luca Freschi & Roger Vargas & Ashaque Husain & S. M. Mostofa Kamal & Alena Skrahina & Sabira Tahseen & Nazir Ismail & Anna Barbova & Stefan Niemann & Daniela Maria Cirillo & Anna S. Dean & Matteo Zign, 2021. "Population structure, biogeography and transmissibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Sólymos, Péter, 2009. "Processing Ecological Data in R with the mefa Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 29(i08).
    14. Alessandro Bellino & Daniela Baldantoni & Vittoria Milano & Lucia Santorufo & Jérôme Cortet & Giulia Maisto, 2021. "Spatial Patterns and Scales of Collembola Taxonomic and Functional Diversity in Urban Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-11, November.
    15. Keith Hunley & Kiela Gwin & Brendan Liberman, 2016. "A Reassessment of the Impact of European Contact on the Structure of Native American Genetic Diversity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Vasilios Liordos & Jukka Jokimäki & Marja-Liisa Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki & Evangelos Valsamidis & Vasileios J. Kontsiotis, 2021. "Niche Analysis and Conservation of Bird Species Using Urban Core Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, June.
    17. María Concepción Vega-Hernández & Carmen Patino-Alonso, 2021. "Comparing COSTATIS and Generalized Procrustes Analysis with Multi-Way Public Education Expenditure Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(15), pages 1-13, July.
    18. Jean-Pierre Rossi & Maxime Nardin & Martin Godefroid & Manuela Ruiz-Diaz & Anne-Sophie Sergent & Alejandro Martinez-Meier & Luc Pâques & Philippe Rozenberg, 2014. "Dissecting the Space-Time Structure of Tree-Ring Datasets Using the Partial Triadic Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    19. Marta Teston & Matteo Orsi & Giovanni Bittante & Alessio Cecchinato & Luigi Gallo & Paola Gatto & Lucio Flavio Macedo Mota & Maurizio Ramanzin & Salvatore Raniolo & Antonella Tormen & Enrico Sturaro, 2022. "Added Value of Local Sheep Breeds in Alpine Agroecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    20. Colléter, Mathieu & Valls, Audrey & Guitton, Jérôme & Gascuel, Didier & Pauly, Daniel & Christensen, Villy, 2015. "Global overview of the applications of the Ecopath with Ecosim modeling approach using the EcoBase models repository," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 302(C), pages 42-53.
    21. Hui, Francis K.C., 2017. "Model-based simultaneous clustering and ordination of multivariate abundance data in ecology," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-10.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0175916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.