IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i15p1816-d605836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing COSTATIS and Generalized Procrustes Analysis with Multi-Way Public Education Expenditure Data

Author

Listed:
  • María Concepción Vega-Hernández

    (Department of Statistics, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain)

  • Carmen Patino-Alonso

    (IGA Research Group, Department of Statistics, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain)

Abstract

Governments serve a variety of purposes, and where governments spend their money has always been of concern to society. In particular, spending on public education is of great interest. However, the volume of this information can be difficult to manage. Therefore, the purpose of this work is to compare the COSTATIS method and generalized Procrustes analysis (GPA) when working with multi-way data. Despite the particular characteristics of each of them, they present similarities and differences that, when analyzed together, can provide complementary results to researchers. The COSTATIS consists of a co-inertia analysis of the compromise of two k-table analyses. The GPA method provides an optimal superimposed representation of individual configurations, and a common consensus configuration is constructed as the mean of all transformed configurations. In addition, the GPA method includes the translation, rotation and scaling of coordinates. In this study, both methods were applied, and the advantages and disadvantages of each are presented. The treated data are a sequence of tables from various countries where different public expenditures on education have been measured over time.

Suggested Citation

  • María Concepción Vega-Hernández & Carmen Patino-Alonso, 2021. "Comparing COSTATIS and Generalized Procrustes Analysis with Multi-Way Public Education Expenditure Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(15), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:15:p:1816-:d:605836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/15/1816/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/15/1816/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dutu Richard & Sicari Patrizio, 2020. "Public Spending Efficiency in the OECD: Benchmarking Health Care, Education, and General Administration," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 20(3), pages 253-280, September.
    2. Sean T. Osis & Blayne A. Hettinga & Shari L. Macdonald & Reed Ferber, 2015. "A novel method to evaluate error in anatomical marker placement using a modified generalized Procrustes analysis," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(10), pages 1108-1116, July.
    3. J. Gower, 1975. "Generalized procrustes analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 40(1), pages 33-51, March.
    4. Dray, Stéphane & Dufour, Anne-Béatrice, 2007. "The ade4 Package: Implementing the Duality Diagram for Ecologists," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 22(i04).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. António Afonso & Ana Patricia Montes & José M. Domínguez, 2024. "Measuring Tax Burden Efficiency in OECD Countries: An International Comparison," CESifo Working Paper Series 11333, CESifo.
    2. António Afonso & José Alves, 2023. "Are fiscal consolidation episodes helpful for public sector efficiency?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(31), pages 3547-3560, July.
    3. Norman Gemmell & Patrick Nolan & Grant Scobie, 2017. "Public sector productivity: Quality adjusting sector-level data on New Zealand schools," Working Papers 2017/02, New Zealand Productivity Commission.
    4. Wenzel Kröber & Martin Böhnke & Erik Welk & Christian Wirth & Helge Bruelheide, 2012. "Leaf Trait-Environment Relationships in a Subtropical Broadleaved Forest in South-East China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-11, April.
    5. Meyners, Michael & Qannari, El Mostafa, 2001. "Relating principal component analysis on merged data sets to a regression approach," Technical Reports 2001,47, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    6. Pengfei Song & Wen Qin & YanGan Huang & Lei Wang & Zhenyuan Cai & Tongzuo Zhang, 2020. "Grazing Management Influences Gut Microbial Diversity of Livestock in the Same Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-12, May.
    7. Juliana Martins Ruzante & Valerie J. Davidson & Julie Caswell & Aamir Fazil & John A. L. Cranfield & Spencer J. Henson & Sven M. Anders & Claudia Schmidt & Jeffrey M. Farber, 2010. "A Multifactorial Risk Prioritization Framework for Foodborne Pathogens," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 724-742, May.
    8. Åsa Johansson, 2016. "Public Finance, Economic Growth and Inequality: A Survey of the Evidence," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1346, OECD Publishing.
    9. Alessandra Cepparulo & Gilles Mourre, 2020. "How and How Much? The Growth-Friendliness of Public Spending through the Lens," European Economy - Discussion Papers 132, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    10. la Grange, Anthony & le Roux, Niël & Gardner-Lubbe, Sugnet, 2009. "BiplotGUI: Interactive Biplots in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 30(i12).
    11. Jonas Eberle & Renier Myburgh & Dirk Ahrens, 2014. "The Evolution of Morphospace in Phytophagous Scarab Chafers: No Competition - No Divergence?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, May.
    12. Liesbeth François & Katrien Wijnrocx & Frédéric G Colinet & Nicolas Gengler & Bettine Hulsegge & Jack J Windig & Nadine Buys & Steven Janssens, 2017. "Genomics of a revived breed: Case study of the Belgian campine cattle," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, April.
    13. Barbara McGillivray & Gard B. Jenset & Khalid Salama & Donna Schut, 2022. "Investigating patterns of change, stability, and interaction among scientific disciplines using embeddings," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Wei Wang & Stephen J Lycett & Noreen von Cramon-Taubadel & Jennie J H Jin & Christopher J Bae, 2012. "Comparison of Handaxes from Bose Basin (China) and the Western Acheulean Indicates Convergence of Form, Not Cognitive Differences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-7, April.
    15. Lisa Sakamoto & Hiromi Kajiya-Kanegae & Koji Noshita & Hideki Takanashi & Masaaki Kobayashi & Toru Kudo & Kentaro Yano & Tsuyoshi Tokunaga & Nobuhiro Tsutsumi & Hiroyoshi Iwata, 2019. "Comparison of shape quantification methods for genomic prediction, and genome-wide association study of sorghum seed morphology," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, November.
    16. Mardia, Kanti V. & Wiechers, Henrik & Eltzner, Benjamin & Huckemann, Stephan F., 2022. "Principal component analysis and clustering on manifolds," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    17. Ibrahim, Muhammad Sohail & Dong, Wei & Yang, Qiang, 2020. "Machine learning driven smart electric power systems: Current trends and new perspectives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    18. Janne Tukiainen & Sebastian Blesse & Albrecht Bohne & Leonardo M. Giuffrida & Jan Jäässkeläinen & Ari Luukinen & Antti Sieppi, 2021. "What Are the Priorities of Bureaucrats? Evidence from Conjoint Experiments with Procurement Officials," EconPol Working Paper 63, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    19. John Gower & Garmt Dijksterhuis, 1994. "Multivariate analysis of coffee images: A study in the simultaneous display of multivariate quantitative and qualitative variables for several assessors," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 165-184, May.
    20. D. Cornille & P. Stinglhamber & L. Van Meensel, 2017. "Public sector efficiency in Belgium," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue i, pages 31-41, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:15:p:1816-:d:605836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.