IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0175011.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A socioeconomic related 'digital divide' exists in how, not if, young people use computers

Author

Listed:
  • Courtenay Harris
  • Leon Straker
  • Clare Pollock

Abstract

Government initiatives have tried to ensure uniform computer access for young people; however a divide related to socioeconomic status (SES) may still exist in the nature of information technology (IT) use. This study aimed to investigate this relationship in 1,351 Western Australian children between 6 and 17 years of age. All participants had computer access at school and 98.9% at home. Neighbourhood SES was related to computer use, IT activities, playing musical instruments, and participating in vigorous physical activity. Participants from higher SES neighbourhoods were more exposed to school computers, reading, playing musical instruments, and vigorous physical activity. Participants from lower SES neighbourhoods were more exposed to TV, electronic games, mobile phones, and non-academic computer activities at home. These patterns may impact future economic, academic, and health outcomes. Better insight into neighbourhood SES influences will assist in understanding and managing the impact of computer use on young people’s health and development.

Suggested Citation

  • Courtenay Harris & Leon Straker & Clare Pollock, 2017. "A socioeconomic related 'digital divide' exists in how, not if, young people use computers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0175011
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0175011
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0175011&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0175011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kwok-Kee Wei & Hock-Hai Teo & Hock Chuan Chan & Bernard C. Y. Tan, 2011. "Conceptualizing and Testing a Social Cognitive Model of the Digital Divide," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 170-187, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Polakshi Bhattacharyya Baruah & Anupam Dutta, 2020. "Factors Affecting the Adaptability of Digitalized mode of Payment among the Small Traders: A Logit Model Analysis," The Review of Finance and Banking, Academia de Studii Economice din Bucuresti, Romania / Facultatea de Finante, Asigurari, Banci si Burse de Valori / Catedra de Finante, vol. 12(2), pages 103-114, December.
    2. Sébastien Goudeau & Camille Sanrey & Arnaud Stanczak & Antony Manstead & Céline Darnon, 2021. "Why lockdown and distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic are likely to increase the social class achievement gap," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(10), pages 1273-1281, October.
    3. Shihui Feng & Cheng Yong Tan, 2024. "Toward conceptual clarity for digital cultural and social capital in student learning: Insights from a systematic literature review," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Sara Ayllón & Halla Holmarsdottir & Samuel Lado, 2023. "Digitally Deprived Children in Europe," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(3), pages 1315-1339, June.
    5. Wei Chen & Jia Miao, 2023. "Does the Internet Moderate the Neighborhood Effect? Internet Use, Neighborhoods, and Mental Health among Older Adults in Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-14, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kai-Lung Hui & I. P. L. Png, 2015. "Research Note—Migration of Service to the Internet: Evidence from a Federal Natural Experiment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 606-618, September.
    2. Yuanren Zhou & Menggen Chen & Xiaojie Liu & Yun Chen, 2024. "A New Framework, Measurement, and Determinants of the Digital Divide in China," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-30, July.
    3. Aini Farmania & Riska Dwinda Elsyah & Ananda Fortunisa, 2022. "The Phenomenon of Technostress during the COVID-19 Pandemic Due to Work from Home in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Srinuan, Chalita & Bohlin, Erik, 2013. "Analysis of fixed broadband access and use in Thailand: Drivers and barriers," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 615-625.
    5. Irawan Nurhas & Stefan Geisler & Jan Pawlowski, 2022. "An intergenerational competency framework: Competencies for knowledge sustainability and start‐up development in the digital age," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1733-1748, December.
    6. Anuradha Mathrani & Rahila Umer & Tarushikha Sarvesh & Janak Adhikari, 2023. "Rural–Urban, Gender, and Digital Divides during the COVID-19 Lockdown: A Multi-Layered Study," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Jyoti Choudrie & Efpraxia Zamani & Chike Obuekwe, 2022. "Bridging the Digital Divide in Ethnic Minority Older Adults: an Organisational Qualitative Study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1355-1375, August.
    8. Yu Song & Chenfei Qian & Susan Pickard, 2021. "Age-Related Digital Divide during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, October.
    9. Myovella, Godwin & Karacuka, Mehmet & Haucap, Justus, 2021. "Determinants of digitalization and digital divide in Sub-Saharan African economies: A spatial Durbin analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(10).
    10. Hee-Woong Kim & Hock Chuan Chan & Atreyi Kankanhalli, 2012. "What Motivates People to Purchase Digital Items on Virtual Community Websites? The Desire for Online Self-Presentation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1232-1245, December.
    11. Haile Teklemariam, Mekuria & Kwon, Youngsun, 2018. "Reducing internet demand-side gap improves digital inclusion in low-income countries: - analysis that is more comprehensive," 22nd ITS Biennial Conference, Seoul 2018. Beyond the boundaries: Challenges for business, policy and society 190411, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    12. Peng Nie & Alfonso Sousa-Poza & Galit Nimrod, 2017. "Internet Use and Subjective Well-Being in China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 489-516, May.
    13. Dahl, Andrew J. & Milne, George R. & Peltier, James W., 2021. "Digital health information seeking in an omni-channel environment: A shared decision-making and service-dominant logic perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 840-850.
    14. Chou, Shih-Wei & Hsu, Chia-Shiang, 2018. "An empirical investigation on knowledge use in virtual communities–A relationship development perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 243-255.
    15. Meng Qi & Bei Zhang & Junjie Li & Bangfan Liu, 2023. "The Three-Dimensional Analytical and Governance Logic of China’s Digital Divide Bridging Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-24, April.
    16. Ankush Agrawal & Chavi Asrani, 2018. "Digital divide among the Indian households: extent and correlates," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(4), pages 2444-2466.
    17. Lisha Ye & Huiqin Yang, 2020. "From Digital Divide to Social Inclusion: A Tale of Mobile Platform Empowerment in Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Sam Ransbotham & Robert G. Fichman & Ram Gopal & Alok Gupta, 2016. "Special Section Introduction—Ubiquitous IT and Digital Vulnerabilities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 834-847, December.
    19. Xose Picatoste & Anabela Mesquita & Fernando González-Laxe, 2023. "Gender wage gap, quality of earnings and gender digital divide in the European context," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 50(2), pages 301-321, May.
    20. Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou & Eli Hustad, 2023. "Bridging Digital Divides: a Literature Review and Research Agenda for Information Systems Research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 955-969, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0175011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.