IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0172091.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why do people buy dogs with potential welfare problems related to extreme conformation and inherited disease? A representative study of Danish owners of four small dog breeds

Author

Listed:
  • P Sandøe
  • S V Kondrup
  • P C Bennett
  • B Forkman
  • I Meyer
  • H F Proschowsky
  • J A Serpell
  • T B Lund

Abstract

A number of dog breeds suffer from welfare problems due to extreme phenotypes and high levels of inherited diseases but the popularity of such breeds is not declining. Using a survey of owners of two popular breeds with extreme physical features (French Bulldog and Chihuahua), one with a high load of inherited diseases not directly related to conformation (Cavalier King Charles Spaniel), and one representing the same size range but without extreme conformation and with the same level of disease as the overall dog population (Cairn Terrier), we investigated this seeming paradox. We examined planning and motivational factors behind acquisition of the dogs, and whether levels of experienced health and behavior problems were associated with the quality of the owner-dog relationship and the intention to re-procure a dog of the same breed. Owners of each of the four breeds (750/breed) were randomly drawn from a nationwide Danish dog registry and invited to participate. Of these, 911 responded, giving a final sample of 846. There were clear differences between owners of the four breeds with respect to degree of planning prior to purchase, with owners of Chihuahuas exhibiting less. Motivations behind choice of dog were also different. Health and other breed attributes were more important to owners of Cairn Terriers, whereas the dog’s personality was reported to be more important for owners of French Bulldogs and Cavalier King Charles Spaniels but less important for Chihuahua owners. Higher levels of health and behavior problems were positively associated with a closer owner-dog relationship for owners of Cavalier King Charles Spaniels and Chihuahuas but, for owners of French Bulldogs, high levels of problems were negatively associated with an intention to procure the same breed again. In light of these findings, it appears less paradoxical that people continue to buy dogs with welfare problems.

Suggested Citation

  • P Sandøe & S V Kondrup & P C Bennett & B Forkman & I Meyer & H F Proschowsky & J A Serpell & T B Lund, 2017. "Why do people buy dogs with potential welfare problems related to extreme conformation and inherited disease? A representative study of Danish owners of four small dog breeds," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0172091
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172091
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172091&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0172091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beverland, Michael B. & Farrelly, Francis & Lim, Elison Ai Ching, 2008. "Exploring the dark side of pet ownership: Status- and control-based pet consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 490-496, May.
    2. Ahuvia, Aaron, 2008. "Commentary on exploring the dark side of pet ownership: Status- and control-based pet consumption: A reinterpretation of the data," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 497-499, May.
    3. Dotson, Michael J. & Hyatt, Eva M., 2008. "Understanding dog-human companionship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 457-466, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kirk, Colleen P., 2019. "Dogs have masters, cats have staff: Consumers' psychological ownership and their economic valuation of pets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 306-318.
    2. Apaolaza, Vanessa & Hartmann, Patrick & Paredes, Mario R. & Trujillo, Alejandra & D'Souza, Clare, 2022. "What motivates consumers to buy fashion pet clothing? The role of attachment, pet anthropomorphism, and self-expansion," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 367-379.
    3. Pirsich, Wiebke & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2017. "The Pet Food Industry: An Innovative Distribution Channel for Animal Welfare Meat?," 2018 International European Forum (163rd EAAE Seminar), February 5-9, 2018, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 276914, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    4. A Zupcic & M Surbek & A Ekert Kabalin & J Dragovic & S Mencik & M Ostovic, 2020. "Missing cat features influencing their returning to owners," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(9), pages 394-400.
    5. Ana Junça-Silva, 2022. "Friends with Benefits: The Positive Consequences of Pet-Friendly Practices for Workers’ Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-10, January.
    6. Ketron, Seth & Naletelich, Kelly, 2019. "Victim or beggar? Anthropomorphic messengers and the savior effect in consumer sustainability behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 73-84.
    7. Healy, Michael John & Beverland, Michael B., 2016. "Being sub-culturally authentic and acceptable to the mainstream: Civilizing practices and self-authentication," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 224-233.
    8. Liu, Yahui & Chang, Xinyu & Yang, Shuai & Li, Zhen & Wu, Yingrong, 2024. "“Pets make you spend more!” Impact of pet ownership on consumer purchase decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    9. Ineke R van Herwijnen & Joanne A M van der Borg & Marc Naguib & Bonne Beerda, 2018. "The existence of parenting styles in the owner-dog relationship," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, February.
    10. Pirsich, Wiebke & von Hardenberg, Louisa Marie & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2017. "The Pet Food Industry: An innovative Distribution Channel for Marketing Feed Products from Welfare Friendly Production to Consumers?," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 8(3), August.
    11. Sinclair, Gary & Tinson, Julie, 2017. "Psychological ownership and music streaming consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-9.
    12. Syrjälä, Henna, 2016. "Turning point of transformation: Consumer communities, identity projects and becoming a serious dog hobbyist," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 177-190.
    13. Pirsich, Wiebke & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2017. "The Pet Food Industry: An Innovative Distribution Channel for Animal Welfare Meat?," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2017(1), June.
    14. Rötzmeier-Keuper, Julia & Hendricks (née Lerch), Jennifer & Wünderlich, Nancy V. & Schmitz, Gertrud, 2018. "Triadic relationships in the context of services for animal companions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 295-303.
    15. José E. Ramos-Ruiz & Minerva Aguilar-Rivero & Jaime Aja-Valle & Lucía Castaño-Prieto, 2024. "An Analysis of the Demand for Tourist Accommodation to Travel with Dogs in Spain," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, January.
    16. Maille, Virginie & Hoffmann, Jonas, 2013. "Compliance with veterinary prescriptions: The role of physical and social risk revisited," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 141-144.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0172091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.