Author
Listed:
- Marlyn Gill
- Sean M Bagshaw
- Emily McKenzie
- Peter Oxland
- Donna Oswell
- Debbie Boulton
- Daniel J Niven
- Melissa L Potestio
- Svetlana Shklarov
- Nancy Marlett
- Henry T Stelfox
- Critical Care Strategic Clinical Network
Abstract
Introduction: Engaging patients and family members as partners in research increases the relevance of study results and enhances patient-centered care; how to best engage patients and families in research is unknown. Methods: We tested a novel research approach that engages and trains patients and family members as researchers to see if we could understand and describe the experiences of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and their families. Former patients and family members conducted focus groups and interviews with patients (n = 11) and families of surviving (n = 14) and deceased (n = 7) patients from 13 ICUs in Alberta Canada, and analyzed data using conventional content analysis. Separate blinded qualitative researchers conducted an independent analysis. Results: Participants described three phases in the patient/family “ICU journey”; admission to ICU, daily care in ICU, and post-ICU experience. Admission to ICU was characterized by family shock and disorientation with families needing the presence and support of a provider. Participants described five important elements of daily care: honoring the patient’s voice, the need to know, decision-making, medical care, and culture in ICU. The post-ICU experience was characterized by the challenges of the transition from ICU to a hospital ward and long-term effects of critical illness. These “ICU journey” experiences were described as integral to appropriate interactions with the care team and comfort and trust in the ICU, which were perceived as essential for a community of caring. Participants provided suggestions for improvement: 1) provide a dedicated family navigator, 2) increase provider awareness of the fragility of family trust, 3) improve provider communication skills, 4) improve the transition from ICU to hospital ward, and 5) inform patients about the long-term effects of critical illness. Analyses by independent qualitative researchers identified similar themes. Conclusions: Patient and family member-led research is feasible and can identify opportunities for improving care.
Suggested Citation
Marlyn Gill & Sean M Bagshaw & Emily McKenzie & Peter Oxland & Donna Oswell & Debbie Boulton & Daniel J Niven & Melissa L Potestio & Svetlana Shklarov & Nancy Marlett & Henry T Stelfox & Critical Care, 2016.
"Patient and Family Member-Led Research in the Intensive Care Unit: A Novel Approach to Patient-Centered Research,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0160947
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160947
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0160947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.