IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0153589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating Anthropogenic Influences into Fire Probability Models: Effects of Human Activity and Climate Change on Fire Activity in California

Author

Listed:
  • Michael L Mann
  • Enric Batllori
  • Max A Moritz
  • Eric K Waller
  • Peter Berck
  • Alan L Flint
  • Lorraine E Flint
  • Emmalee Dolfi

Abstract

The costly interactions between humans and wildfires throughout California demonstrate the need to understand the relationships between them, especially in the face of a changing climate and expanding human communities. Although a number of statistical and process-based wildfire models exist for California, there is enormous uncertainty about the location and number of future fires, with previously published estimates of increases ranging from nine to fifty-three percent by the end of the century. Our goal is to assess the role of climate and anthropogenic influences on the state’s fire regimes from 1975 to 2050. We develop an empirical model that integrates estimates of biophysical indicators relevant to plant communities and anthropogenic influences at each forecast time step. Historically, we find that anthropogenic influences account for up to fifty percent of explanatory power in the model. We also find that the total area burned is likely to increase, with burned area expected to increase by 2.2 and 5.0 percent by 2050 under climatic bookends (PCM and GFDL climate models, respectively). Our two climate models show considerable agreement, but due to potential shifts in rainfall patterns, substantial uncertainty remains for the semiarid inland deserts and coastal areas of the south. Given the strength of human-related variables in some regions, however, it is clear that comprehensive projections of future fire activity should include both anthropogenic and biophysical influences. Previous findings of substantially increased numbers of fires and burned area for California may be tied to omitted variable bias from the exclusion of human influences. The omission of anthropogenic variables in our model would overstate the importance of climatic ones by at least 24%. As such, the failure to include anthropogenic effects in many models likely overstates the response of wildfire to climatic change.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael L Mann & Enric Batllori & Max A Moritz & Eric K Waller & Peter Berck & Alan L Flint & Lorraine E Flint & Emmalee Dolfi, 2016. "Incorporating Anthropogenic Influences into Fire Probability Models: Effects of Human Activity and Climate Change on Fire Activity in California," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0153589
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153589
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153589&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0153589?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haiganoush K. Preisler & M. A. Krawchuk & M. A. Moritz, 2014. "Burning issues: statistical analyses of global fire data to inform assessments of environmental change," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(6), pages 472-481, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandra D Syphard & Timothy Sheehan & Heather Rustigian-Romsos & Kenneth Ferschweiler, 2018. "Mapping future fire probability under climate change: Does vegetation matter?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Zhongzhen Yang & Liquan Guo & Zaili Yang, 2019. "Emergency logistics for wildfire suppression based on forecasted disaster evolution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 917-937, December.
    3. Isaac W Park & Michael L Mann & Lorraine E Flint & Alan L Flint & Max Moritz, 2021. "Relationships of climate, human activity, and fire history to spatiotemporal variation in annual fire probability across California," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0153589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.