IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0149635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attentional and Contextual Priors in Sound Perception

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Wolmetz
  • Mounya Elhilali

Abstract

Behavioral and neural studies of selective attention have consistently demonstrated that explicit attentional cues to particular perceptual features profoundly alter perception and performance. The statistics of the sensory environment can also provide cues about what perceptual features to expect, but the extent to which these more implicit contextual cues impact perception and performance, as well as their relationship to explicit attentional cues, is not well understood. In this study, the explicit cues, or attentional prior probabilities, and the implicit cues, or contextual prior probabilities, associated with different acoustic frequencies in a detection task were simultaneously manipulated. Both attentional and contextual priors had similarly large but independent impacts on sound detectability, with evidence that listeners tracked and used contextual priors for a variety of sound classes (pure tones, harmonic complexes, and vowels). Further analyses showed that listeners updated their contextual priors rapidly and optimally, given the changing acoustic frequency statistics inherent in the paradigm. A Bayesian Observer model accounted for both attentional and contextual adaptations found with listeners. These results bolster the interpretation of perception as Bayesian inference, and suggest that some effects attributed to selective attention may be a special case of contextual prior integration along a feature axis.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Wolmetz & Mounya Elhilali, 2016. "Attentional and Contextual Priors in Sound Perception," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0149635
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149635
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149635&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0149635?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takeo Watanabe & José E. Náñez & Yuka Sasaki, 2001. "Perceptual learning without perception," Nature, Nature, vol. 413(6858), pages 844-848, October.
    2. Daniel Bendor & Xiaoqin Wang, 2005. "The neuronal representation of pitch in primate auditory cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 436(7054), pages 1161-1165, August.
    3. Kathleen M. O'Craven & Paul E. Downing & Nancy Kanwisher, 1999. "fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6753), pages 584-587, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark R. Saddler & Ray Gonzalez & Josh H. McDermott, 2021. "Deep neural network models reveal interplay of peripheral coding and stimulus statistics in pitch perception," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Falk Lieder & Klaas E Stephan & Jean Daunizeau & Marta I Garrido & Karl J Friston, 2013. "A Neurocomputational Model of the Mismatch Negativity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Philip J Monahan & Kevin de Souza & William J Idsardi, 2008. "Neuromagnetic Evidence for Early Auditory Restoration of Fundamental Pitch," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(8), pages 1-6, August.
    4. Gwangsu Kim & Dong-Kyum Kim & Hawoong Jeong, 2024. "Spontaneous emergence of rudimentary music detectors in deep neural networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Jeremy D W Greenlee & Roozbeh Behroozmand & Charles R Larson & Adam W Jackson & Fangxiang Chen & Daniel R Hansen & Hiroyuki Oya & Hiroto Kawasaki & Matthew A Howard III, 2013. "Sensory-Motor Interactions for Vocal Pitch Monitoring in Non-Primary Human Auditory Cortex," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, April.
    6. Loyda Hernández-Andrade & Ana Cristina Hermosillo-Abundis & Brenda Lesly Betancourt-Navarrete & Diane Ruge & Carlos Trenado & Rafael Lemuz-López & Héctor Juan Pelayo-González & Vicente Arturo López-Co, 2022. "EEG Global Coherence in Scholar ADHD Children during Visual Object Processing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-24, May.
    7. Jill X O'Reilly & Saad Jbabdi & Matthew F S Rushworth & Timothy E J Behrens, 2013. "Brain Systems for Probabilistic and Dynamic Prediction: Computational Specificity and Integration," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, September.
    8. Jia-Hou Poh & Mai-Anh T. Vu & Jessica K. Stanek & Abigail Hsiung & Tobias Egner & R. Alison Adcock, 2022. "Hippocampal convergence during anticipatory midbrain activation promotes subsequent memory formation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Aaron R Seitz & Takeo Watanabe, 2008. "Is Task-Irrelevant Learning Really Task-Irrelevant?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(11), pages 1-6, November.
    10. R Channing Moore & Tyler Lee & Frédéric E Theunissen, 2013. "Noise-invariant Neurons in the Avian Auditory Cortex: Hearing the Song in Noise," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Daniel Bendor, 2015. "The Role of Inhibition in a Computational Model of an Auditory Cortical Neuron during the Encoding of Temporal Information," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, April.
    12. Tarryn Balsdon & M. Andrea Pisauro & Marios G. Philiastides, 2024. "Distinct basal ganglia contributions to learning from implicit and explicit value signals in perceptual decision-making," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Christophe Micheyl & Paul R Schrater & Andrew J Oxenham, 2013. "Auditory Frequency and Intensity Discrimination Explained Using a Cortical Population Rate Code," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-7, November.
    14. Patrick C M Wong & Bharath Chandrasekaran & Jing Zheng, 2012. "The Derived Allele of ASPM Is Associated with Lexical Tone Perception," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-8, April.
    15. Oded Barzelay & Miriam Furst & Omri Barak, 2017. "A New Approach to Model Pitch Perception Using Sparse Coding," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-36, January.
    16. Weiping Yang & Jingjing Yang & Yulin Gao & Xiaoyu Tang & Yanna Ren & Satoshi Takahashi & Jinglong Wu, 2015. "Effects of Sound Frequency on Audiovisual Integration: An Event-Related Potential Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0149635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.