IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0141505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Likeability of Garden Birds: Importance of Species Knowledge & Richness in Connecting People to Nature

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel T C Cox
  • Kevin J Gaston

Abstract

Interacting with nature is widely recognised as providing many health and well-being benefits. As people live increasingly urbanised lifestyles, the provision of food for garden birds may create a vital link for connecting people to nature and enabling them to access these benefits. However, it is not clear which factors determine the pleasure that people receive from watching birds at their feeders. These may be dependent on the species that are present, the abundance of individuals and the species richness of birds around the feeders. We quantitatively surveyed urban households from towns in southern England to determine the factors that influence the likeability of 14 common garden bird species, and to assess whether people prefer to see a greater abundance of individuals or increased species richness at their feeders. There was substantial variation in likeability across species, with songbirds being preferred over non-songbirds. Species likeability increased for people who fed birds regularly and who could name the species. We found a strong correlation between the number of species that a person could correctly identify and how connected to nature they felt when they watched garden birds. Species richness was preferred over a greater number of individuals of the same species. Although we do not show causation this study suggests that it is possible to increase the well-being benefits that people gain from watching birds at their feeders. This could be done first through a human to bird approach by encouraging regular interactions between people and their garden birds, such as through learning the species names and providing food. Second, it could be achieved through a bird to human approach by increasing garden songbird diversity because the pleasure that a person receives from watching an individual bird at a feeder is dependent not only on its species but also on the diversity of birds at the feeder.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel T C Cox & Kevin J Gaston, 2015. "Likeability of Garden Birds: Importance of Species Knowledge & Richness in Connecting People to Nature," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0141505
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0141505
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0141505&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0141505?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kristine Maciejewski & Graham I H Kerley, 2014. "Understanding Tourists’ Preference for Mammal Species in Private Protected Areas: Is There a Case for Extralimital Species for Ecotourism?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-8, February.
    2. Mitchell, Richard, 2013. "Is physical activity in natural environments better for mental health than physical activity in other environments?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 130-134.
    3. Zoe G Davies & Richard A Fuller & Martin Dallimer & Alison Loram & Kevin J Gaston, 2012. "Household Factors Influencing Participation in Bird Feeding Activity: A National Scale Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-10, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Brent Jackson & Kathryn T. Stevenson & Lincoln R. Larson & M. Nils Peterson & Erin Seekamp, 2021. "Outdoor Activity Participation Improves Adolescents’ Mental Health and Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Beth S Robinson & Richard Inger & Kevin J Gaston, 2016. "A Rose by Any Other Name: Plant Identification Knowledge & Socio-Demographics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Elliott, Lewis R. & White, Mathew P. & Taylor, Adrian H. & Herbert, Stephen, 2015. "Energy expenditure on recreational visits to different natural environments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 53-60.
    4. Andrés Ried & María Jesús Monteagudo & Pelayo Benavides & Anne Le Bon & Stephanie Carmody & Rodrigo Santos, 2020. "Key Aspects of Leisure Experiences in Protected Wilderness Areas: Notions of Nature, Senses of Place and Perceived Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Sung-Kwon Hong & Sang-Woo Lee & Hyun-Kil Jo & Miyeon Yoo, 2019. "Impact of Frequency of Visits and Time Spent in Urban Green Space on Subjective Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-25, August.
    6. Lingbo Liu & Yuni Zhong & Siya Ao & Hao Wu, 2019. "Exploring the Relevance of Green Space and Epidemic Diseases Based on Panel Data in China from 2007 to 2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Victoria Houlden & Scott Weich & João Porto de Albuquerque & Stephen Jarvis & Karen Rees, 2018. "The relationship between greenspace and the mental wellbeing of adults: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-35, September.
    8. Julie Clark & Ade Kearns, 2015. "Pathways to a physical activity legacy: Assessing the regeneration potential of multi-sport events using a prospective approach," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(8), pages 888-909, December.
    9. Junia N. de Brito & Zachary C. Pope & Nathan R. Mitchell & Ingrid E. Schneider & Jean M. Larson & Teresa H. Horton & Mark A. Pereira, 2019. "Changes in Psychological and Cognitive Outcomes after Green versus Suburban Walking: A Pilot Crossover Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-12, August.
    10. Hana Sonbol & Hadil M. Alahdal & Rasis A. Alanazi & Khawla Alsamhary & Fuad Ameen, 2021. "COVID-19 Pandemic Causing Depression in Different Sociodemographic Groups in Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-11, June.
    11. Ernest Bielinis & Jenni Simkin & Pasi Puttonen & Liisa Tyrväinen, 2020. "Effect of Viewing Video Representation of the Urban Environment and Forest Environment on Mood and Level of Procrastination," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-23, July.
    12. Tsai-Chiao Wang & Ta-Wei Tang & Chia-Liang Tsai, 2022. "The Visual Attention and Psychological Responses from Older Customers to Wellness Service Pictures of Hotels," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-12, January.
    13. Marija Opačak & Erda Wang, 2019. "Estimating Willingness to Pay for a Future Recreational Park Atop the Current Jakuševec Landfill in Zagreb, Croatia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Lisa Orii & Luis Alonso & Kent Larson, 2020. "Methodology for Establishing Well-Being Urban Indicators at the District Level to be Used on the CityScope Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-25, November.
    15. Kyoungmi Park & Shun Wang, 2019. "Youth Activities and Children’s Subjective Well-Being in Korea," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(7), pages 2351-2365, October.
    16. Stefania Toselli & Laura Bragonzoni & Laura Dallolio & Alessia Grigoletto & Alice Masini & Sofia Marini & Giuseppe Barone & Erika Pinelli & Raffaele Zinno & Mario Mauro & Gerardo Astorino & Pietro Lor, 2022. "The Effects of Park Based Interventions on Health: The Italian Project “Moving Parks”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, February.
    17. Jennifer Brown & Ronald MacDonald & Richard Mitchell, 2015. "Are People Who Participate in Cultural Activities More Satisfied with Life?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 135-146, May.
    18. Cao, Yu & Li, Heng, 2023. "Everything has a limit: How intellectual humility lowers the preference for naturalness as reflected in drug choice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    19. Benjumea Mejia, Diana M. & Chilton, John & Rutherford, Peter, 2024. "Collective urban green revitalisation: Crime control an sustainable behaviours in lower-income neighbourhoods," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    20. Cristina Vert & Mark Nieuwenhuijsen & Mireia Gascon & James Grellier & Lora E. Fleming & Mathew P. White & David Rojas-Rueda, 2019. "Health Benefits of Physical Activity Related to an Urban Riverside Regeneration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0141505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.