IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0118726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mixture Models for Distance Sampling Detection Functions

Author

Listed:
  • David L Miller
  • Len Thomas

Abstract

We present a new class of models for the detection function in distance sampling surveys of wildlife populations, based on finite mixtures of simple parametric key functions such as the half-normal. The models share many of the features of the widely-used “key function plus series adjustment” (K+A) formulation: they are flexible, produce plausible shapes with a small number of parameters, allow incorporation of covariates in addition to distance and can be fitted using maximum likelihood. One important advantage over the K+A approach is that the mixtures are automatically monotonic non-increasing and non-negative, so constrained optimization is not required to ensure distance sampling assumptions are honoured. We compare the mixture formulation to the K+A approach using simulations to evaluate its applicability in a wide set of challenging situations. We also re-analyze four previously problematic real-world case studies. We find mixtures outperform K+A methods in many cases, particularly spiked line transect data (i.e., where detectability drops rapidly at small distances) and larger sample sizes. We recommend that current standard model selection methods for distance sampling detection functions are extended to include mixture models in the candidate set.

Suggested Citation

  • David L Miller & Len Thomas, 2015. "Mixture Models for Distance Sampling Detection Functions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0118726
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0118726
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0118726&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0118726?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fernanda F. C. Marques & Stephen T. Buckland, 2003. "Incorporating Covariates into Standard Line Transect Analyses," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(4), pages 924-935, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Earl F Becker & Aaron M Christ, 2015. "A Unimodal Model for Double Observer Distance Sampling Surveys," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    2. S. T. Buckland & C. S. Oedekoven & D. L. Borchers, 2016. "Model-Based Distance Sampling," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(1), pages 58-75, March.
    3. D. L. Borchers & B. C. Stevenson & D. Kidney & L. Thomas & T. A. Marques, 2015. "A Unifying Model for Capture-Recapture and Distance Sampling Surveys of Wildlife Populations," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 195-204, March.
    4. Pavanato, Heloise J. & Wedekin, Leonardo L. & Guilherme-Silveira, Fernando R. & Engel, Márcia H. & Kinas, Paul G., 2017. "Estimating humpback whale abundance using hierarchical distance sampling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 358(C), pages 10-18.
    5. Rachel A Vanausdall & Stephen J Dinsmore, 2020. "Detection and density of breeding marsh birds in Iowa wetlands," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Tiago Marques & Stephen Buckland & Regina Bispo & Brett Howland, 2013. "Accounting for animal density gradients using independent information in distance sampling surveys," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 22(1), pages 67-80, March.
    7. Mark V. Bravington & David L. Miller & Sharon L. Hedley, 2021. "Variance Propagation for Density Surface Models," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(2), pages 306-323, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0118726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.