Fast to Forgive, Slow to Retaliate: Intuitive Responses in the Ultimatum Game Depend on the Degree of Unfairness
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096344
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Jörg Oechssler & Andreas Roider & Patrick W. Schmitz, 2015.
"Cooling Off in Negotiations: Does it Work?,"
Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 171(4), pages 565-588, December.
- Oechssler, Jörg & Roider, Andreas & Schmitz, Patrick W., 2008. "Cooling-Off in Negotiations - Does It Work?," Papers 08-06, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.
- Oechssler, Jörg & Roider, Andreas & Schmitz, Patrick W., 2009. "Cooling-Off in Negotiations - Does It Work?," Working Papers 0463, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
- Oechssler, Jörg & Roider, Andreas & Schmitz, Patrick W., 2008. "Cooling-Off in Negotiations - Does It Work?," Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications 08-06, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim;Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim.
- Schmitz, Patrick W. & Roider, Andreas & Oechssler, Joerg, 2008. "Cooling-Off in Negotiations - Does It Work?," CEPR Discussion Papers 6807, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Ariel Rubinstein, 2007.
"Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: A Study of Response Times,"
Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 117(523), pages 1243-1259, October.
- Rubinstein, Ariel, 2006. "Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: A Study of Response Times," Economic Theory and Applications Working Papers 12181, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
- Ariel Rubinstein, 2006. "Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: A Study of Response Times," Working Papers 2006.36, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
- Ariel Rubinstein, 2006. "Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: A Study of Response Times," Discussion Papers 1424, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
- Dominique Cappellettia & Werner Güth & Matteo Ploner, 2008. "Being of two minds: an ultimatum experiment investigating affective processes," Jena Economics Research Papers 2008-048, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
- Fischbacher, Urs & Gachter, Simon & Fehr, Ernst, 2001.
"Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment,"
Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 397-404, June.
- Urs Fischbacher & Simon Gaechter & Ernst Fehr, "undated". "Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from a Public Goods Experiment," IEW - Working Papers 016, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
- Grimm, Veronika & Mengel, Friederike, 2011.
"Let me sleep on it: Delay reduces rejection rates in ultimatum games,"
Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 113-115, May.
- Grimm, V. & Mengel, F., 2010. "Let me sleep on it: delay reduces rejection rates in Ultimatum Games," Research Memorandum 017, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
- Nicholas Bardsley, 2000. "Control Without Deception: Individual Behaviour in Free-Riding Experiments Revisited," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 3(3), pages 215-240, December.
- David G. Rand & Joshua D. Greene & Martin A. Nowak, 2012. "Spontaneous giving and calculated greed," Nature, Nature, vol. 489(7416), pages 427-430, September.
- Nicholas Bardsley, 2000. "Control without Deception," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 00-107/1, Tinbergen Institute.
- Ernst Fehr & Simon Gächter, 2002.
"Altruistic punishment in humans,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6868), pages 137-140, January.
- Ernst Fehr & Simon Gaechter, 2003. "Altruistic Punishment in Humans," Microeconomics 0305006, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Drew Fudenberg & David G. Rand & Anna Dreber, 2012.
"Slow to Anger and Fast to Forgive: Cooperation in an Uncertain World,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(2), pages 720-749, April.
- Rand, David G & Fudenberg, Drew & Dreber, Anna, 2012. "Slow to Anger and Fast to Forgive: Cooperation in an Uncertain World," Scholarly Articles 11223697, Harvard University Department of Economics.
- Sutter, Matthias & Kocher, Martin & Strau[ss], Sabine, 2003.
"Bargaining under time pressure in an experimental ultimatum game,"
Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 341-347, December.
- Sutter, Matthias & Kocher, Martin G. & Strauß, Sabine, 2003. "Bargaining under time pressure in an experimental ultimatum game," Munich Reprints in Economics 18220, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
- David G. Rand & Alexander Peysakhovich & Gordon T. Kraft-Todd & George E. Newman & Owen Wurzbacher & Martin A. Nowak & Joshua D. Greene, 2014. "Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, May.
- Ariel Rubinstein, 2007. "Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: Response Times Study," Levine's Bibliography 321307000000001011, UCLA Department of Economics.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Crosetto, Paolo & Güth, Werner, 2021.
"What are you calling intuitive? Subject heterogeneity as a driver of response times in an impunity game,"
Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
- Paolo Crosetto & Werner Güth, 2020. "What are you calling intuitive? Subject heterogeneity as a driver of response times in an impunity game," Working Papers hal-02949346, HAL.
- Crosetto, P. & Güth, W., 2020. "What are you calling intuitive? Subject heterogeneity as a driver of response times in an impunity game," Working Papers 2020-09, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).
- Werner Güth & Paolo Crosetto, 2021. "What are you calling intuitive? Subject heterogeneity as a driver of response times in an impunity game," Post-Print hal-03722234, HAL.
- Clithero, John A., 2018. "Response times in economics: Looking through the lens of sequential sampling models," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 61-86.
- Clark H. Warner & Marion Fortin & Tessa Melkonian, 2024. "When Are We More Ethical? A Review and Categorization of the Factors Influencing Dual-Process Ethical Decision-Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(4), pages 843-882, February.
- Herzenstein, Michal & Dholakia, Utpal M. & Sonenshein, Scott, 2020. "How the number of options affects prosocial choice," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 356-370.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Krawczyk, Michał & Sylwestrzak, Marta, 2018.
"Exploring the role of deliberation time in non-selfish behavior: The double response method,"
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 121-134.
- Marta Dyrkacz & Michal Krawczyk, 2015. "Exploring the role of deliberation time in non-selfish behaviour: the Double Response method," Working Papers 2015-27, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
- Mischkowski, Dorothee & Glöckner, Andreas & Lewisch, Peter, 2018. "From spontaneous cooperation to spontaneous punishment – Distinguishing the underlying motives driving spontaneous behavior in first and second order public good games," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 59-72.
- Brice Corgnet & Antonio M. Espín & Roberto Hernán-González, 2015.
"The cognitive basis of social behavior: cognitive reflection overrides antisocial but not always prosocial motives,"
Working Papers
15-04, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
- Brice Corgnet & Antonio M. Espin & Roberto Hernán-González, 2015. "The cognitive basis of social behavior : cognitive reflection overrides antisocial but not always prosocial motives," Post-Print hal-02311954, HAL.
- Recalde, María P. & Riedl, Arno & Vesterlund, Lise, 2018.
"Error-prone inference from response time: The case of intuitive generosity in public-good games,"
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 132-147.
- Maria P. Recalde & Arno Riedl & Lise Vesterlund, 2014. "Error Prone Inference from Response Time: The Case of Intuitive Generosity in Public Good Times," CESifo Working Paper Series 4987, CESifo.
- Lise Vesterlund, 2015. "Error Prone Inference from Response Time: The Case of Intuitive Generosity in Public-Good Games," Working Paper 5662, Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh.
- Gilles Grolleau & Angela Sutan & Sana El Harbi & Marwa Jedidi, 2018.
"Do We Need More Time To Give Less? Experimental Evidence From Tunisia,"
Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(4), pages 400-409, October.
- Gilles Grolleau & Angela Sutan & Sana El Harbi & Marwa Jedidi, 2018. "Do we need more time to give less? Experimental evidence from Tunisia," Post-Print hal-01905541, HAL.
- Martinsson, Peter & Myrseth, Kristian Ove R. & Wollbrant, Conny, 2014. "Social dilemmas: When self-control benefits cooperation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 213-236.
- Sascha Grehl & Andreas Tutić, 2022. "Intuition, reflection, and prosociality: Evidence from a field experiment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-14, February.
- Artavia-Mora, Luis & Bedi, Arjun S. & Rieger, Matthias, 2017. "Intuitive help and punishment in the field," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 133-145.
- Goeschl, Timo & Lohse, Johannes, 2018.
"Cooperation in public good games. Calculated or confused?,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 185-203.
- Goeschl, Timo & Lohse, Johannes, 2016. "Cooperation in Public Good Games. Calculated or Confused?," Working Papers 0626, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
- Chisadza, Carolyn & Nicholls, Nicky & Yitbarek, Eleni, 2021. "Group identity in fairness decisions: Discrimination or inequality aversion?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
- Emin Karagözoglu & Martin G. Kocher, 2015.
"Bargaining under Time Pressure,"
CESifo Working Paper Series
5685, CESifo.
- Karagözoğlu, Emin & Kocher, Martin G., 2015. "Bargaining under Time Pressure," Discussion Papers in Economics 26642, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
- Anna Louisa Merkel & Johannes Lohse, 2019.
"Is fairness intuitive? An experiment accounting for subjective utility differences under time pressure,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 22(1), pages 24-50, March.
- Merkel, Anna & Lohse, Johannes, 2018. "Is fairness intuitive? An experiment accounting for subjective utility differences under time pressure," Working Papers 0647, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
- Kristian Ove R. Myrseth & Gerhard Riener & Conny Wollbrant, 2013.
"Tangible temptation in the social dilemma: Cash, cooperation, and self-control,"
ESMT Research Working Papers
ESMT-13-04, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
- Myrseth, Kristian Ove R. & Riener, Gerhard & Wollbrant, Conny, 2013. "Tangible temptation in the social dilemma : cash, cooperation, and self-control," Borradores Departamento de Economía 17489, Universidad de Antioquia, CIE.
- Myrseth, Kristian Ove R. & Riener, Gerhard & Wollbrant, Conny, 2013. "Tangible Temptation in the Social Dilemma: Cash, cooperation, and self-control," Working Papers in Economics 567, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2015.
"Social preferences in the online laboratory: a randomized experiment,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 18(2), pages 251-283, June.
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2012. "Social preferences in the online laboratory : A randomized experiment," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00748615, HAL.
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2015. "Social preferences in the online laboratory: a randomized experiment," Post-Print halshs-00984211, HAL.
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2012. "Social preferences in the online laboratory : A randomized experiment," Post-Print halshs-00748615, HAL.
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2012. "Social preferences in the online laboratory.A randomized experiment," Working Papers of LaRGE Research Center 2012-10, Laboratoire de Recherche en Gestion et Economie (LaRGE), Université de Strasbourg.
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2012. "Social preferences in the online laboratory: A randomized experiment," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 12070, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2015. "Social preferences in the online laboratory: a randomized experiment," SciencePo Working papers Main halshs-00984211, HAL.
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2015. "Social preferences in the online laboratory: a randomized experiment," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00984211, HAL.
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2012. "Social preferences in the online laboratory : A randomized experiment," SciencePo Working papers Main halshs-00748615, HAL.
- Johannes Lohse & Timo Goeschl & Johannes H. Diederich, 2017. "Giving is a Question of Time: Response Times and Contributions to an Environmental Public Good," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(3), pages 455-477, July.
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet & Stéphane Luchini & Jason F. Shogren, 2022.
"Leveraging the Honor Code: Public Goods Contributions under Oath,"
Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 81(3), pages 591-616, March.
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet & Stéphane Luchini & Jason F Shogren, 2016. "Leveraging the Honor Code: Public Goods Contributions under Oath," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01379060, HAL.
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet & Stéphane Luchini & Jason Shogren, 2022. "Leveraging the Honor Code: Public Goods Contributions under Oath," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03666626, HAL.
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet & Stéphane Luchini & Jason Shogren, 2022. "Leveraging the Honor Code: Public Goods Contributions under Oath," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-03666626, HAL.
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet & Stéphane Luchini & Jason Shogren, 2022. "Leveraging the Honor Code: Public Goods Contributions under Oath," Post-Print halshs-03666626, HAL.
- Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet & Stéphane Luchini & Jason F Shogren, 2016. "Leveraging the Honor Code: Public Goods Contributions under Oath," Working Papers halshs-01379060, HAL.
- Roman M. Sheremeta, 2016.
"Impulsive Behavior in Competition: Testing Theories of Overbidding in Rent-Seeking Contests,"
Working Papers
16-21, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
- Roman Sheremeta, 2018. "Impulsive Behavior in Competition: Testing Theories of Overbidding in Rent-Seeking Contests," Working Papers 18-03, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
- Sheremeta, Roman, 2016. "Impulsive Behavior in Competition: Testing Theories of Overbidding in Rent-Seeking Contests," MPRA Paper 73731, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Nielsen, Ulrik H. & Tyran, Jean-Robert & Wengström, Erik, 2014.
"Second thoughts on free riding,"
Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 136-139.
- Ulrik H. Nielsen & Jean-Robert Tyran & Erik Wengström, 2013. "Second Thoughts on Free Riding," Discussion Papers 13-08, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
- Nielsen, Ulrik H. & Tyran, Jean-Robert & Wengström, Erik, 2013. "Second Thoughts on Free Riding," Working Papers 2013:29, Lund University, Department of Economics.
- Cappelletti, Dominique & Güth, Werner & Ploner, Matteo, 2011. "Being of two minds: Ultimatum offers under cognitive constraints," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 940-950.
- Akihiro Nishi & Nicholas A Christakis & David G Rand, 2017. "Cooperation, decision time, and culture: Online experiments with American and Indian participants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-9, February.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0096344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.