IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0082858.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association of TLR2 and TLR4 Polymorphisms with Risk of Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Longbiao Zhu
  • Hua Yuan
  • Tao Jiang
  • Ruixia Wang
  • Hongxia Ma
  • Shuangyue Zhang

Abstract

Backgrounds: The activation of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) may be an important event in the immune evasion of tumor cell. Recently, numerous studies have investigated the associations between TLR2 −196 to −174 del and two SNPs of TLR4 (rs4986790 and rs4986791) and the susceptibility to different types of cancer; however, the results remain conflicting. The aim of this study was to assess the association between TLR2 and TLR4 polymorphisms and cancer risk in a meta-analysis with eligible published studies. Methodology/Principle Findings: A dataset composed of 14627 cases and 17438 controls from 34 publications were included in a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between overall cancer risk or cancer-specific risk and three SNPs of TLRs (TLR2 −196 to −174 del, TLR4 rs4986790 and rs4986791). The results showed that all of these three polymorphisms were significantly associated with the increased cancer risk (dominant model: OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.04–2.60 for TLR2 −196 to −174 del; OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.01–1.41 for TLR4 rs4986790; and OR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.120–1.80 for TLR4 rs4986791; respectively). In stratified analysis, we found the effect of TLR2 −196 to −174 del on cancer risk remained significant in the subgroup of Caucasians and South Asians, but not in East Asians. However, the association between rs4986791 and cancer risk was significant in both South Asians and East Asians, but not in Caucasians. Furthermore, the association between rs4986790 and cancer risk was statistically significant in digestive cancers (dominant model: OR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.13–2.73) and female-specific cancers (dominant model: OR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.16–1.94). However, no significant association with risk of digestive system cancers was observed for TLR2 −196 to −174 del and TLR4 rs4986791. Conclusions/Significance: This meta-analysis presented additional evidence for the association between TLR2 and TLR4 polymorphisms and cancer risk. Further well-designed investigations with large sample sizes are required to confirm this conclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Longbiao Zhu & Hua Yuan & Tao Jiang & Ruixia Wang & Hongxia Ma & Shuangyue Zhang, 2013. "Association of TLR2 and TLR4 Polymorphisms with Risk of Cancer: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-9, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0082858
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082858
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0082858
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0082858&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0082858?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Natalia Castaño-Rodríguez & Nadeem O Kaakoush & Khean-Lee Goh & Kwong Ming Fock & Hazel M Mitchell, 2013. "The Role of TLR2, TLR4 and CD14 Genetic Polymorphisms in Gastric Carcinogenesis: A Case-Control Study and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Alan Aderem & Richard J. Ulevitch, 2000. "Toll-like receptors in the induction of the innate immune response," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6797), pages 782-787, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pei-Hsuan Weng & Yi-Ling Huang & John H Page & Jen-Hau Chen & Jianfeng Xu & Stella Koutros & Sonja Berndt & Stephen Chanock & Meredith Yeager & John S Witte & Rosalind A Eeles & Douglas F Easton & Dav, 2014. "Polymorphisms of an Innate Immune Gene, Toll-Like Receptor 4, and Aggressive Prostate Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-12, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Genetha Gray & Pamela Williams & W. Brown & Jean-Loup Faulon & Kenneth Sale, 2010. "Disparate data fusion for protein phosphorylation prediction," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 219-235, February.
    2. Jun Wang & Xufeng Guo & Shijie Yu & Jia Song & Jixiang Zhang & Zhuo Cao & Jing Wang & Min Liu & Weiguo Dong, 2014. "Association between CD14 Gene Polymorphisms and Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-9, June.
    3. Yueyue Gui & Yujing Zeng & Binrui Chen & Yueping Yang & Jiehua Ma & Chao Li, 2023. "A smart pathogen detector engineered from intracellular hydrogelation of DNA-decorated macrophages," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Yang Cheng & Yun Zhu & Xiuping Huang & Wei Zhang & Zelong Han & Side Liu, 2015. "Association between TLR2 and TLR4 Gene Polymorphisms and the Susceptibility to Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0082858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.