IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0082650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Androgen Receptor Expression on Breast Cancer Survival: A Retrospective Study and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Qing Qu
  • Yan Mao
  • Xiao-chun Fei
  • Kun-wei Shen

Abstract

Recent studies have highlighted the role of androgen receptor (AR) as a prognostic biomarker of breast cancer. However, its predictive role in disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) still remains inconclusive. The present study aimed to retrospectively investigate the association between AR and survival outcomes in breast cancer and also identify this association by a meta-analysis of published researches. Clinical data from 109 patients with breast cancer, who underwent surgery at Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, were retrospectively analyzed for immunohistochemical AR expression measured by tissue microarray. For meta-analysis, articles available in Pubmed on the relationship between AR and breast cancer outcomes were included. Data obtained from both were combined and analyzed. Women with AR positive tumors in the retrospective study had a significantly better DFS (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.88) and OS (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.85) than women with AR negative ones. Meta-analysis showed that AR expression in breast tumors was an indicator of better DFS (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.43-0.64). In subgroup analysis, AR could predict DFS outcome in estrogen receptor (ER) positive (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.34-0.59), ER negative (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26-0.67), and triple negative breast cancer (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23-0.69). Moreover, in ER positive breast cancer patients, the expression of AR could predict better OS (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.82). The present analysis indicated that AR expression was associated with lower risk of recurrence in patients with all breast cancer types and better OS in cases with ER positive.

Suggested Citation

  • Qing Qu & Yan Mao & Xiao-chun Fei & Kun-wei Shen, 2013. "The Impact of Androgen Receptor Expression on Breast Cancer Survival: A Retrospective Study and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-1, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0082650
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0082650
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0082650&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0082650?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles M. Perou & Therese Sørlie & Michael B. Eisen & Matt van de Rijn & Stefanie S. Jeffrey & Christian A. Rees & Jonathan R. Pollack & Douglas T. Ross & Hilde Johnsen & Lars A. Akslen & Øystein Flu, 2000. "Molecular portraits of human breast tumours," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6797), pages 747-752, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Xi & Hoadley, Katherine A. & Hannig, Jan & Marron, J.S., 2023. "Jackstraw inference for AJIVE data integration," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    2. Egashira, Kento & Yata, Kazuyoshi & Aoshima, Makoto, 2024. "Asymptotic properties of hierarchical clustering in high-dimensional settings," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. María Elena Martínez & Jonathan T Unkart & Li Tao & Candyce H Kroenke & Richard Schwab & Ian Komenaka & Scarlett Lin Gomez, 2017. "Prognostic significance of marital status in breast cancer survival: A population-based study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Yishai Shimoni, 2018. "Association between expression of random gene sets and survival is evident in multiple cancer types and may be explained by sub-classification," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Yoo-Ah Kim & Stefan Wuchty & Teresa M Przytycka, 2011. "Identifying Causal Genes and Dysregulated Pathways in Complex Diseases," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, March.
    6. Radhakrishnan Nagarajan & Marco Scutari, 2013. "Impact of Noise on Molecular Network Inference," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, December.
    7. R Joseph Bender & Feilim Mac Gabhann, 2013. "Expression of VEGF and Semaphorin Genes Define Subgroups of Triple Negative Breast Cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Deepak Poduval & Zuzana Sichmanova & Anne Hege Straume & Per Eystein Lønning & Stian Knappskog, 2020. "The novel microRNAs hsa-miR-nov7 and hsa-miR-nov3 are over-expressed in locally advanced breast cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Zhiguang Huo & Li Zhu & Tianzhou Ma & Hongcheng Liu & Song Han & Daiqing Liao & Jinying Zhao & George Tseng, 2020. "Two-Way Horizontal and Vertical Omics Integration for Disease Subtype Discovery," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, April.
    10. Markus Ringnér & Erik Fredlund & Jari Häkkinen & Åke Borg & Johan Staaf, 2011. "GOBO: Gene Expression-Based Outcome for Breast Cancer Online," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-11, March.
    11. Casey S Greene & Olga G Troyanskaya, 2012. "Chapter 2: Data-Driven View of Disease Biology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-8, December.
    12. Mark Reimers, 2010. "Making Informed Choices about Microarray Data Analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-7, May.
    13. Alan A. Arslan & Yian Zhang & Nedim Durmus & Sultan Pehlivan & Adrienne Addessi & Freya Schnabel & Yongzhao Shao & Joan Reibman, 2021. "Breast Cancer Characteristics in the Population of Survivors Participating in the World Trade Center Environmental Health Center Program 2002–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-11, July.
    14. Sandra M. Rocha & Sílvia Socorro & Luís A. Passarinha & Cláudio J. Maia, 2022. "Comprehensive Landscape of STEAP Family Members Expression in Human Cancers: Unraveling the Potential Usefulness in Clinical Practice Using Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-48, May.
    15. Martin H van Vliet & Christiaan N Klijn & Lodewyk F A Wessels & Marcel J T Reinders, 2007. "Module-Based Outcome Prediction Using Breast Cancer Compendia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(10), pages 1-10, October.
    16. Sung Gwe Ahn & Minkyung Lee & Tae Joo Jeon & Kyunghwa Han & Hak Min Lee & Seung Ah Lee & Young Hoon Ryu & Eun Ju Son & Joon Jeong, 2014. "[18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Can Contribute to Discriminate Patients with Poor Prognosis in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-7, August.
    17. Erhan Bilal & Janusz Dutkowski & Justin Guinney & In Sock Jang & Benjamin A Logsdon & Gaurav Pandey & Benjamin A Sauerwine & Yishai Shimoni & Hans Kristian Moen Vollan & Brigham H Mecham & Oscar M Rue, 2013. "Improving Breast Cancer Survival Analysis through Competition-Based Multidimensional Modeling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Maurizio Callari & Antonio Lembo & Giampaolo Bianchini & Valeria Musella & Vera Cappelletti & Luca Gianni & Maria Grazia Daidone & Paolo Provero, 2014. "Accurate Data Processing Improves the Reliability of Affymetrix Gene Expression Profiles from FFPE Samples," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, January.
    19. Silje Kjølle & Kenneth Finne & Even Birkeland & Vandana Ardawatia & Ingeborg Winge & Sura Aziz & Gøril Knutsvik & Elisabeth Wik & Joao A. Paulo & Heidrun Vethe & Dimitrios Kleftogiannis & Lars A. Aksl, 2023. "Hypoxia induced responses are reflected in the stromal proteome of breast cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Zheqi Li & Olivia McGinn & Yang Wu & Amir Bahreini & Nolan M. Priedigkeit & Kai Ding & Sayali Onkar & Caleb Lampenfeld & Carol A. Sartorius & Lori Miller & Margaret Rosenzweig & Ofir Cohen & Nikhil Wa, 2022. "ESR1 mutant breast cancers show elevated basal cytokeratins and immune activation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0082650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.