IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0078957.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory Workplace Interventions Can Reduce Sedentary Time for Office Workers—A Randomised Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Sharon Parry
  • Leon Straker
  • Nicholas D Gilson
  • Anne J Smith

Abstract

Background: Occupational sedentary behaviour is an important contributor to overall sedentary risk. There is limited evidence for effective workplace interventions to reduce occupational sedentary time and increase light activity during work hours. The purpose of the study was to determine if participatory workplace interventions could reduce total sedentary time, sustained sedentary time (bouts >30 minutes), increase the frequency of breaks in sedentary time and promote light intensity activity and moderate/vigorous activity (MVPA) during work hours. Methods: A randomised controlled trial (ANZCTR number: ACTN12612000743864) was conducted using clerical, call centre and data processing workers (n = 62, aged 25–59 years) in 3 large government organisations in Perth, Australia. Three groups developed interventions with a participatory approach: ‘Active office’ (n = 19), ‘Active Workstation’ and promotion of incidental office activity; ‘Traditional physical activity’ (n = 14), pedometer challenge to increase activity between productive work time and ‘Office ergonomics’ (n = 29), computer workstation design and breaking up computer tasks. Accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X, 7 days) determined sedentary time, sustained sedentary time, breaks in sedentary time, light intensity activity and MVPA on work days and during work hours were measured before and following a 12 week intervention period. Results: For all participants there was a significant reduction in sedentary time on work days (−1.6%, p = 0.006) and during work hours (−1.7%, p = 0.014) and a significant increase in number of breaks/sedentary hour on work days (0.64, p = 0.005) and during work hours (0.72, p = 0.015); there was a concurrent significant increase in light activity during work hours (1.5%, p = 0.012) and MVPA on work days (0.6%, p = 0.012). Conclusions: This study explored novel ways to modify work practices to reduce occupational sedentary behaviour. Participatory workplace interventions can reduce sedentary time, increase the frequency of breaks and improve light activity and MVPA of office workers by using a variety of interventions. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTN12612000743864.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharon Parry & Leon Straker & Nicholas D Gilson & Anne J Smith, 2013. "Participatory Workplace Interventions Can Reduce Sedentary Time for Office Workers—A Randomised Controlled Trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-10, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0078957
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078957
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0078957
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0078957&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0078957?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jessica Stone & S. Fiona Barker & Danijela Gasevic & Rosanne Freak-Poli, 2023. "Participation in the Global Corporate Challenge ® , a Four-Month Workplace Pedometer Program, Reduces Psychological Distress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Anna Puig-Ribera & Judit Bort-Roig & Angel M González-Suárez & Iván Martínez-Lemos & Maria Giné-Garriga & Josep Fortuño & Joan C Martori & Laura Muñoz-Ortiz & Raimon Milà & Jim McKenna & Nicholas D Gi, 2015. "Patterns of Impact Resulting from a ‘Sit Less, Move More’ Web-Based Program in Sedentary Office Employees," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Bradley MacDonald & Xanne Janssen & Alison Kirk & Mhairi Patience & Ann-Marie Gibson, 2018. "An Integrative, Systematic Review Exploring the Research, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of Interventions to Reduce Sedentary Behaviour in Office Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-29, December.
    4. Viktoria Wahlström & David Olsson & Fredrik Öhberg & Tommy Olsson & Lisbeth Slunga Järvholm, 2020. "Underlying Factors Explaining Physical Behaviors among Office Workers—An Exploratory Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Sara Moreira & Maria Salomé Ferreira & Maria Begoña Criado & Jorge Machado & Cristina Mesquita & Sofia Lopes & Paula Clara Santos, 2021. "Occupational Health: Does Compliance with Physical Activity Recommendations Have a Preventive Effect on Musculoskeletal Symptoms in Computer Workers? A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-13, July.
    6. Kelly Mackenzie & Elizabeth Such & Paul Norman & Elizabeth Goyder, 2021. "Using Co-Production to Develop “Sit Less at Work” Interventions in a Range of Organisations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-12, July.
    7. Lidewij R Renaud & Erwin M Speklé & Allard J van der Beek & Hidde P van der Ploeg & H Roeline Pasman & Maaike A Huysmans, 2020. "The user and non-user perspective: Experiences of office workers with long-term access to sit-stand workstations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Vera Schellewald & Jens Kleinert & Rolf Ellegast, 2018. "Introducing a Dynamic Workstation in the Office: Insights in Characteristics of Use and Short-Term Changes of Well-Being in a 12 Week Observational Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Viktoria Wahlström & Anncristine Fjellman-Wiklund & Mette Harder & Lisbeth Slunga Järvholm & Therese Eskilsson, 2019. "Implementing a Physical Activity Promoting Program in a Flex-Office: A Process Evaluation with a Mixed Methods Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Holly Blake & Betsy Lai & Emil Coman & Jonathan Houdmont & Amanda Griffiths, 2019. "Move-It: A Cluster-Randomised Digital Worksite Exercise Intervention in China: Outcome and Process Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-23, September.
    11. Jihoon Kim & Ryoko Mizushima & Kotaro Nishida & Masahiro Morimoto & Yoshio Nakata, 2022. "Multi-Component Intervention to Promote Physical Activity in Japanese Office Workers: A Single-Arm Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Lars Donath & Oliver Faude & Yannick Schefer & Ralf Roth & Lukas Zahner, 2015. "Repetitive Daily Point of Choice Prompts and Occupational Sit-Stand Transfers, Concentration and Neuromuscular Performance in Office Workers: An RCT," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, April.
    13. Emily Mear & Valerie Frances Gladwell & Jamie Pethick, 2022. "The Effect of Breaking Up Sedentary Time with Calisthenics on Neuromuscular Function: A Preliminary Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, November.
    14. Meng, Annette & Borg, Vilhelm & Clausen, Thomas, 2019. "Enhancing the social capital in industrial workplaces: Developing workplace interventions using intervention mapping," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 227-236.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0078957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.