IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0062282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of the Non-Pneumatic Anti-Shock Garment (NASG) for Life-Threatening Obstetric Hemorrhage: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Egypt and Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Tori Sutherland
  • Janelle Downing
  • Suellen Miller
  • David M Bishai
  • Elizabeth Butrick
  • Mohamed M F Fathalla
  • Mohammed Mourad-Youssif
  • Oladosu Ojengbede
  • David Nsima
  • James G Kahn

Abstract

Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of a non-pneumatic anti-shock garment (NASG) for obstetric hemorrhage in tertiary hospitals in Egypt and Nigeria. Methods: We combined published data from pre-intervention/NASG-intervention clinical trials with costs from study sites. For each country, we used observed proportions of initial shock level (mild: mean arterial pressure [MAP] >60 mmHg; severe: MAP ≤60 mmHg) to define a standard population of 1,000 women presenting in shock. We examined three intervention scenarios: no women in shock receive the NASG, only women in severe shock receive the NASG, and all women in shock receive the NASG. Clinical data included frequencies of adverse health outcomes (mortality, severe morbidity, severe anemia), and interventions to manage bleeding (uterotonics, blood transfusions, hysterectomies). Costs (in 2010 international dollars) included the NASG, training, and clinical interventions. We compared costs and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) across the intervention scenarios. Results: For 1000 women presenting in shock, providing the NASG to those in severe shock results in decreased mortality and morbidity, which averts 357 DALYs in Egypt and 2,063 DALYs in Nigeria. Differences in use of interventions result in net savings of $9,489 in Egypt (primarily due to reduced transfusions) and net costs of $6,460 in Nigeria, with a cost per DALY averted of $3.13. Results of providing the NASG for women in mild shock has smaller and uncertain effects due to few clinical events in this data set. Conclusion: Using the NASG for women in severe shock resulted in markedly improved health outcomes (2–2.9 DALYs averted per woman, primarily due to reduced mortality), with net savings or extremely low cost per DALY averted. This suggests that in resource-limited settings, the NASG is a very cost-effective intervention for women in severe hypovolemic shock. The effects of the NASG for mild shock are less certain.

Suggested Citation

  • Tori Sutherland & Janelle Downing & Suellen Miller & David M Bishai & Elizabeth Butrick & Mohamed M F Fathalla & Mohammed Mourad-Youssif & Oladosu Ojengbede & David Nsima & James G Kahn, 2013. "Use of the Non-Pneumatic Anti-Shock Garment (NASG) for Life-Threatening Obstetric Hemorrhage: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Egypt and Nigeria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-8, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0062282
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062282
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062282&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0062282?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sue J Goldie & Steve Sweet & Natalie Carvalho & Uma Chandra Mouli Natchu & Delphine Hu, 2010. "Alternative Strategies to Reduce Maternal Mortality in India: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-1, April.
    2. Murray D. Krahn & Gary Naglie & David Naimark & Donald A. Redelmeier & Allan S. Detsky, 1997. "Primer on Medical Decision Analysis: Part 4-Analyzing the Model and Interpreting the Results," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 17(2), pages 142-151, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neily Zakiyah & Antoinette D I van Asselt & Frank Roijmans & Maarten J Postma, 2016. "Economic Evaluation of Family Planning Interventions in Low and Middle Income Countries; A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Hannah Tappis & Anis Kazi & Waqas Hameed & Zaib Dahar & Anayat Ali & Sohail Agha, 2015. "The Role of Quality Health Services and Discussion about Birth Spacing in Postpartum Contraceptive Use in Sindh, Pakistan: A Multilevel Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Donald A. Redelmeier & Allan S. Detsky & Murray D. Krahn & David Naimark & Gary Naglie, 1997. "Guidelines for Verbal Presentations of Medical Decision Analyses," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 17(2), pages 228-230, April.
    4. Kenneth J. Smith & Amber E. Barnato & Mark S. Roberts, 2006. "Teaching Medical Decision Modeling: A Qualitative Description of Student Errors and Curriculum Responses," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 26(6), pages 583-588, November.
    5. Achamyeleh Birhanu Teshale & Getayeneh Antehunegn Tesema, 2020. "Prevalence and associated factors of delayed first antenatal care booking among reproductive age women in Ethiopia; a multilevel analysis of EDHS 2016 data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, July.
    6. World Bank, 2010. "Determinants and Consequences of High Fertility," World Bank Publications - Reports 27497, The World Bank Group.
    7. Juhee Lee & Peter F. Thall & Bora Lim & Pavlos Msaouel, 2022. "Utility‐based Bayesian personalized treatment selection for advanced breast cancer," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1605-1622, November.
    8. Douglas K. Owens, 2002. "Analytic Tools for Public Health Decision Making," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 22(1_suppl), pages 3-10, September.
    9. Allan S. Detsky & Gary Naglie & Murray D. Krahn & David Naimark & Donald A. Redelmeier, 1997. "Primer on Medical Decision Analysis: Part 1—Getting Started," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 17(2), pages 123-125, April.
    10. Sabyasachi Tripathi & Moinak Maiti, 2023. "Does urbanization improve health outcomes: a cross country level analysis," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 277-316, March.
    11. Abhishek Singh & Saseendran Pallikadavath & Faujdar Ram & Reuben Ogollah, 2012. "Inequalities in Advice Provided by Public Health Workers to Women during Antenatal Sessions in Rural India," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-8, September.
    12. Allan S. Detsky & Gary Naglie & Murray D. Krahn & Donald A. Redelmeier & David Naimark, 1997. "Primer on Medical Decision Analysis: Part 2—Building a Tree," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 17(2), pages 126-135, April.
    13. Gary Naglie & Murray D. Krahn & David Naimark & Donald A. Redelmeier & Allan S. Detsky, 1997. "Primer on Medical Decision Analysis: Part 3—Estimating Probabilities and Utilities," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 17(2), pages 136-141, April.
    14. Fylkesnes, Knut & Sandøy, Ingvild Fossgard & Jürgensen, Marte & Chipimo, Peter J. & Mwangala, Sheila & Michelo, Charles, 2013. "Strong effects of home-based voluntary HIV counselling and testing on acceptance and equity: A cluster randomised trial in Zambia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 9-16.
    15. Leone, Tiziana & Coast, Ernestina & Parmar, Divya & Vwalika, Bellington, 2016. "The individual level cost of pregnancy termination in Zambia: a comparison of safe and unsafe abortion," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64716, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0062282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.