IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v26y2006i6p583-588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teaching Medical Decision Modeling: A Qualitative Description of Student Errors and Curriculum Responses

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth J. Smith

    (Decision Sciences and Clinical Systems Modeling, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 200 Meyran Avenue, 2nd Floor, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; smithkj2@upmc.edu.)

  • Amber E. Barnato
  • Mark S. Roberts

Abstract

Background . Novice medical decision modelers are prone to errors. The purpose of this article is to describe the common errors committed by decision modeling students and the changes made to a structured decision modeling project course in response. Curriculum . The decision modeling curriculum includes month-long segments in decision analysis, cost-effectiveness analyses, and a project course. In the project course, students solve a decision problem with prespecified assumptions and input variable values, with the expectation that all reach the same answer. At first, students worked in groups of 2 or 3 but more recently work individually; over time, there have been other changes in the course. Originally, the only assignment was an abstract and 10-minute presentation describing their solution, but now periodic homework monitors progress. Outcomes . Students' results frequently differed significantly from the expected answers. Errors were common in sensitivity analyses and model construction, among other areas. Defensible differences in structural programming decisions were rare. More recently, result ranges have narrowed as stepwise homework ensures progress and areas prone to error are emphasized. Student communication is timelier, facilitated by homeworkrelated questions. Individual, rather than group, work avoids potential problems with weaker students being carried by the more advanced. Student satisfaction has increased, with more beginning their own projects afterward. Conclusion . Solving a common decision problem is an efficient teaching tool. Closer supervision leads to increased satisfaction and decreased frustration, facilitated by a more structured approach and the anticipation of common errors.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth J. Smith & Amber E. Barnato & Mark S. Roberts, 2006. "Teaching Medical Decision Modeling: A Qualitative Description of Student Errors and Curriculum Responses," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 26(6), pages 583-588, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:26:y:2006:i:6:p:583-588
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06295360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X06295360
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X06295360?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew H. Briggs & A. E. Ades & Martin J. Price, 2003. "Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis for Decision Trees with Multiple Branches: Use of the Dirichlet Distribution in a Bayesian Framework," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 23(4), pages 341-350, July.
    2. Murray D. Krahn & Gary Naglie & David Naimark & Donald A. Redelmeier & Allan S. Detsky, 1997. "Primer on Medical Decision Analysis: Part 4-Analyzing the Model and Interpreting the Results," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 17(2), pages 142-151, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alan Brennan & Samer Kharroubi & Anthony O'Hagan & Jim Chilcott, 2007. "Calculating Partial Expected Value of Perfect Information via Monte Carlo Sampling Algorithms," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 27(4), pages 448-470, July.
    2. Rachael DiSantostefano & Andrea Biddle & John Lavelle, 2006. "The Long-Term Cost Effectiveness of Treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 171-191, February.
    3. Nick Bansback & Roberta Ara & Sue Ward & Aslam Anis & Hyon Choi, 2009. "Statin Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 25-37, January.
    4. Donald A. Redelmeier & Allan S. Detsky & Murray D. Krahn & David Naimark & Gary Naglie, 1997. "Guidelines for Verbal Presentations of Medical Decision Analyses," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 17(2), pages 228-230, April.
    5. Andrija S Grustam & Nasuh Buyukkaramikli & Ron Koymans & Hubertus J M Vrijhoef & Johan L Severens, 2019. "Value of information analysis in telehealth for chronic heart failure management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Douglas K. Owens, 2002. "Analytic Tools for Public Health Decision Making," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 22(1_suppl), pages 3-10, September.
    7. Allan S. Detsky & Gary Naglie & Murray D. Krahn & Donald A. Redelmeier & David Naimark, 1997. "Primer on Medical Decision Analysis: Part 2—Building a Tree," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 17(2), pages 126-135, April.
    8. Yuanhui Zhang & Haipeng Wu & Brian T. Denton & James R. Wilson & Jennifer M. Lobo, 2019. "Probabilistic sensitivity analysis on Markov models with uncertain transition probabilities: an application in evaluating treatment decisions for type 2 diabetes," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 34-52, March.
    9. Tori Sutherland & Janelle Downing & Suellen Miller & David M Bishai & Elizabeth Butrick & Mohamed M F Fathalla & Mohammed Mourad-Youssif & Oladosu Ojengbede & David Nsima & James G Kahn, 2013. "Use of the Non-Pneumatic Anti-Shock Garment (NASG) for Life-Threatening Obstetric Hemorrhage: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Egypt and Nigeria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-8, April.
    10. Regina Rendas-Baum & Min Yang & Joseph Gricar & Gene Wallenstein, 2010. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for premenstrual dysphoric disorder," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 129-140, March.
    11. Rungskunroch, Panrawee & Jack, Anson & Kaewunruen, Sakdirat, 2021. "Benchmarking on railway safety performance using Bayesian inference, decision tree and petri-net techniques based on long-term accidental data sets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    12. A. E. Ades & Karl Claxton & Mark Sculpher, 2006. "Evidence synthesis, parameter correlation and probabilistic sensitivity analysis," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(4), pages 373-381, April.
    13. Pedram Sendi & Huldrych F Günthard & Mathew Simcock & Bruno Ledergerber & Jörg Schüpbach & Manuel Battegay & for the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, 2007. "Cost-Effectiveness of Genotypic Antiretroviral Resistance Testing in HIV-Infected Patients with Treatment Failure," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(1), pages 1-8, January.
    14. Ya-Chen Shih & Josephine Mauskopf & Rohit Borker, 2007. "A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line Controller Therapies for Persistent Asthma," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 577-590, July.
    15. Laura McCullagh & Cathal Walsh & Michael Barry, 2012. "Value-of-Information Analysis to Reduce Decision Uncertainty Associated with the Choice of Thromboprophylaxis after Total Hip Replacement in the Irish Healthcare Setting," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(10), pages 941-959, October.
    16. Naren Kumar Surendra & Mohd Rizal Abdul Manaf & Lai Seong Hooi & Sunita Bavanandan & Fariz Safhan Mohamad Nor & Shahnaz Shah Firdaus Khan & Ong Loke Meng & Abdul Halim Abdul Gafor, 2019. "Cost utility analysis of end stage renal disease treatment in Ministry of Health dialysis centres, Malaysia: Hemodialysis versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Juhee Lee & Peter F. Thall & Bora Lim & Pavlos Msaouel, 2022. "Utility‐based Bayesian personalized treatment selection for advanced breast cancer," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1605-1622, November.
    18. Mylene Lagarde & John Cairns, 2012. "Modelling human resources policies with Markov models: an illustration with the South African nursing labour market," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 270-282, September.
    19. Allan S. Detsky & Gary Naglie & Murray D. Krahn & David Naimark & Donald A. Redelmeier, 1997. "Primer on Medical Decision Analysis: Part 1—Getting Started," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 17(2), pages 123-125, April.
    20. Ankur Pandya & Ashley A Eggman & Hooman Kamel & Ajay Gupta & Bruce R Schackman & Pina C Sanelli, 2016. "Modeling the Cost Effectiveness of Neuroimaging-Based Treatment of Acute Wake-Up Stroke," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:26:y:2006:i:6:p:583-588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.