IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0054970.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Prognostic Value of Epigenetic Silencing of p16 Gene in NSCLC Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang Lou-Qian
  • Yin Rong
  • Li Ming
  • Yang Xin
  • Jiang Feng
  • Xu Lin

Abstract

Background: The prognostic significance of p16 promoter hypermethylation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still controversial. This analysis presents pooled estimates of the association to better elucidate whether p16 methylation has a prognostic role in NSCLC. Methods: Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases until June 2012. The association of p16 methylation with both overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was preformed. Studies were pooled and summary hazard ratios (HR) were calculated. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analysis and publication bias were also conducted. Results: A total of 18 studies containing 2432 patients met the inclusion criteria and had sufficient survival data for quantitative aggregation. The results showed that p16 methylation was an indicator of poor prognosis in NSCLC. The HR was 1.36 (95% CI: 1.08–1.73, I2 = 56.7%) and 1.68 (95% CI: 1.12–2.52, I2 = 38.7%) for OS and DFS, respectively. Subgroup analyses were carried out. The HRs of fresh and paraffin tissue were 1.50 (95% CI: 1.11–2.01) and 1.10 (95% CI: 0.77–1.57). The pooled HR was 1.40 (95% CI: 1.02–1.92) for methylation-specific PCR (MSP) and 1.26 (95% CI: 0.87–1.82) for quantitative MSP (Q-MSP). The combined HR of the 16 studies reporting NSCLC as a whole indicated that patients with p16 hypermethylation had poor prognosis. No significant association was found when adenocarcinoma subtype pooled. When seven studies on DFS were aggregated, the HR was 1.68 (95% CI: 1.12–2.52) without significant heterogeneity. Moreover, no obvious publication bias was detected on both OS and DFS. Conclusion: The meta-analysis findings support the hypothesis that p16 methylation is associated with OS and DFS in NSCLC patients. Large well-designed prospective studies are now needed to confirm the clinical utility of p16 methylation as an independent prognostic marker.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang Lou-Qian & Yin Rong & Li Ming & Yang Xin & Jiang Feng & Xu Lin, 2013. "The Prognostic Value of Epigenetic Silencing of p16 Gene in NSCLC Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-7, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0054970
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054970
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054970
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054970&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0054970?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nur Sabrina Sapari & Marie Loh & Aparna Vaithilingam & Richie Soong, 2012. "Clinical Potential of DNA Methylation in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-8, April.
    2. Bo Zhang & Wei Zhu & Ping Yang & Tao Liu & Mei Jiang & Zhi-Ni He & Shi-Xin Zhang & Wei-Qing Chen & Wen Chen, 2011. "Cigarette Smoking and p16INK4α Gene Promoter Hypermethylation in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(12), pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanyu Cao & Si Wang & Zhenyu Zhang & Jiangyan Lou, 2016. "Prognostic Value of Overexpressed p16INK4a in Vulvar Cancer: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-11, March.
    2. Jing Chen & Tao Li & Qilun Liu & Haiyan Jiao & Wenjun Yang & Xiaoxia Liu & Zhenghao Huo, 2014. "Clinical and Prognostic Significance of HIF-1α, PTEN, CD44v6, and Survivin for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Diandian Li & Yi Liu & Bo Wang, 2020. "Single versus bilateral lung transplantation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jundong Gu & Yanjun Wen & Siwei Zhu & Feng Hua & Hui Zhao & Hongrui Xu & Jiacong You & Linlin Sun & Weiqiang Wang & Jun Chen & Qinghua Zhou, 2013. "Association between P16INK4a Promoter Methylation and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Zongyue Zeng & Jiangen Wang & Liuyang Zhao & Ping Hu & Hailong Zhang & Xi Tang & Dali He & Shifu Tang & Zhaofang Zeng, 2013. "Potential Role of microRNA-21 in the Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-7, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0054970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.